StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Jenkins vs Skaffold

Jenkins vs Skaffold

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
Skaffold
Skaffold
Stacks86
Followers186
Votes0

Jenkins vs Skaffold: What are the differences?

Key differences between Jenkins and Skaffold

Jenkins and Skaffold are both popular tools used in the software development lifecycle, but they have different functionalities and purposes. Here are the key differences between Jenkins and Skaffold:

  1. Deployment-oriented vs Build-focused: Jenkins is primarily focused on build and deployment automation, providing features such as continuous integration and delivery. It is designed to compile, test, and package code to be deployed to various environments. On the other hand, Skaffold is a deployment tool specifically designed for Kubernetes. It streamlines the development workflow by automating the build, push, and deployment of applications within a Kubernetes cluster.

  2. Plugin-based vs Configuration-driven: Jenkins offers extensive plugin support, allowing users to customize and extend its functionality according to their specific needs. It has a wide range of plugins available for different purposes like source code management, testing, and notifications. Conversely, Skaffold relies on a configuration-driven approach. It uses a declarative configuration file (skaffold.yaml) to specify the build and deployment settings for the application.

  3. Centralized vs Distributed: Jenkins is typically deployed as a centralized server with various agents or nodes to perform different tasks. It enables managing build jobs centrally and allows scalability by adding more agents. On the other hand, Skaffold is a distributed tool that can be installed and used by individual developers on their local machines. It facilitates an iterative development process by providing a quick feedback loop within the developer's environment.

  4. Extensibility vs Simplicity: Jenkins provides a high level of extensibility and flexibility through its plugin ecosystem. It supports integration with various tools and services, making it suitable for complex build and deployment scenarios. Skaffold, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and ease of use. It provides a streamlined workflow specifically for Kubernetes, eliminating the need for extensive configuration and allowing developers to focus on application development.

  5. Supported Technologies: Jenkins is a versatile tool that can be used with different platforms and technologies. It has integrations with a wide range of programming languages, version control systems, and build tools. Skaffold, on the other hand, is specifically designed for Kubernetes-based development. It provides native support for containerized applications and Kubernetes-specific features like image tagging, resource management, and rolling deployments.

  6. Community and Adoption: Jenkins has been in the market for a long time and has a large and active community. It has been widely adopted in the industry and has a vast ecosystem of plugins and resources. Skaffold, on the other hand, is a relatively newer tool compared to Jenkins. While it is gaining popularity, its community and available resources are not as extensive as Jenkins.

In summary, Jenkins is a feature-rich automation tool suitable for build and deployment automation across various platforms, while Skaffold is a lightweight and simplified tool specifically designed for Kubernetes-based development, offering a streamlined workflow within the development environment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Skaffold

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

530k views530k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
Skaffold
Skaffold

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Skaffold is a command line tool that facilitates continuous development for Kubernetes applications. You can iterate on your application source code locally then deploy to local or remote Kubernetes clusters. Skaffold handles the workflow for building, pushing and deploying your application. It can also be used in an automated context such as a CI/CD pipeline to leverage the same workflow and tooling when moving applications to production.

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
No server-side component. No overhead to your cluster.;Detect changes in your source code and automatically build/push/deploy.;Image tag management. Stop worrying about updating the image tags in Kubernetes manifests to push out changes during development.;Supports existing tooling and workflows. Build and deploy APIs make each implementation composable to support many different workflows.;Support for multiple application components. Build and deploy only the pieces of your stack that have changed.;Deploy regularly when saving files or run one off deployments using the same configuration
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
86
Followers
50.4K
Followers
186
Votes
2.2K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Lack of support
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Skaffold?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana