JHipster vs Phalcon: What are the differences?
Developers describe JHipster as "An Open Source application generator". It is a free and open-source application generator used to quickly develop modern web applications and Microservices using Spring Boot + Angular / React / Vue. On the other hand, Phalcon is detailed as "Web framework delivered as a C-extension for PHP". Phalcon is a web framework implemented as a C extension offering high performance and lower resource consumption.
JHipster and Phalcon can be primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.
JHipster and Phalcon are both open source tools. It seems that JHipster with 14.1K GitHub stars and 2.88K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Phalcon with 9.73K GitHub stars and 1.78K GitHub forks.
Sellsuki, Learning Data, and Ringostat are some of the popular companies that use Phalcon, whereas JHipster is used by Logo Yazilim, apside, and CSB. Phalcon has a broader approval, being mentioned in 28 company stacks & 15 developers stacks; compared to JHipster, which is listed in 5 company stacks and 5 developer stacks.
What is JHipster?
What is Phalcon?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose JHipster?
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using JHipster?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
'm a professional web developer from Vietnam with B.S Physics and Engineering. I'm a Phalcon enthusiast as Opensource. In free time, I was support on forum Phalcon also my forum and contribution core Phalcon.
I think precompiled PHP is the way to go. It saves CPU cycles, RAM and overall I/O. It saves money too. Smaller requirements = smaller bills.
I've tried symfony and zend. Phalcon was easiest to use.