Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
JHipster vs Phalcon: What are the differences?
Developers describe JHipster as "An Open Source application generator". It is a free and open-source application generator used to quickly develop modern web applications and Microservices using Spring Boot + Angular / React / Vue. On the other hand, Phalcon is detailed as "Web framework delivered as a C-extension for PHP". Phalcon is a web framework implemented as a C extension offering high performance and lower resource consumption.
JHipster and Phalcon can be primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.
JHipster and Phalcon are both open source tools. It seems that JHipster with 14.1K GitHub stars and 2.88K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Phalcon with 9.73K GitHub stars and 1.78K GitHub forks.
Sellsuki, Learning Data, and Ringostat are some of the popular companies that use Phalcon, whereas JHipster is used by Logo Yazilim, apside, and CSB. Phalcon has a broader approval, being mentioned in 28 company stacks & 15 developers stacks; compared to JHipster, which is listed in 5 company stacks and 5 developer stacks.
Pros of JHipster
Pros of Phalcon
- Fast65
- High performance54
- Open source37
- Fast and easy to use35
- Scalable32
- Versatile23
- Fiexble22
- Automatic routing20
- It is easy and fast19
- Is very good17
- Low overhead9
- Dependency injection9
- Awesome6
- Easy and fast2
- Great for API1
- Clean Architecture1
- Modularity1
- Easy Setup1
- Very customizable0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of JHipster
Cons of Phalcon
- Support few databases4
- Very bad documentation2