Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Apache JMeter

421
280
+ 1
10
Testrail

196
259
+ 1
30
Add tool

Apache JMeter vs Testrail: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache JMeter and Testrail are two popular tools used in software testing. While both tools serve the purpose of testing, there are key differences between them that make them suitable for different scenarios. In this article, we will explore six key differences between Apache JMeter and Testrail.

  1. Functional Testing vs. Performance Testing: One of the major differences between Apache JMeter and Testrail is their primary focus. Apache JMeter is designed primarily for performance testing, helping you evaluate the performance of your software application under various load conditions. On the other hand, Testrail is focused on functional testing, allowing you to systematically test the functionality of your software.

  2. Open-Source vs. Commercial Tool: Apache JMeter is an open-source tool, which means it is freely available for anyone to use and modify. It has a large community of developers and users who actively contribute to its development and support. Testrail, on the other hand, is a commercial tool that requires a paid license for usage. It offers additional features and support that may be beneficial for certain testing scenarios.

  3. Protocol Support: Another significant difference between Apache JMeter and Testrail lies in their protocol support. Apache JMeter supports a wide range of protocols, including HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, JDBC, SOAP, and many more. This makes it suitable for testing different types of applications. On the contrary, Testrail focuses primarily on web-based applications, providing specific features and integrations for web testing.

  4. User Interface and Reporting: The user interface and reporting capabilities of Apache JMeter and Testrail also differ. Apache JMeter offers a functional, yet somewhat complex, user interface with a wide range of options and configurations. It provides basic reporting capabilities and raw data analysis. On the other hand, Testrail provides a user-friendly interface with intuitive workflows and comprehensive reporting features, making it easier to track and manage test results.

  5. Collaboration and Integration: Collaboration and integration capabilities are also differentiating factors between Apache JMeter and Testrail. Apache JMeter supports collaboration through version control systems like Git, allowing multiple testers to work on the same test plan simultaneously. It can also be integrated with other tools like Jenkins for continuous integration. Testrail, on the other hand, offers built-in collaboration features, allowing testers to collaborate on test cases, track progress, and share information within a centralized platform.

  6. Automation and Test Management: Automation and test management features are more prominent in Testrail compared to Apache JMeter. Testrail provides extensive test case management capabilities, allowing you to organize, document, and track test cases efficiently. It also offers automation features, such as test run scheduling and execution, to streamline the testing process. While Apache JMeter does provide some level of automation support, it is primarily focused on load testing and does not offer dedicated test management functionalities.

In summary, Apache JMeter is an open-source tool focused on performance testing with protocol support for a wide range of applications. Testrail, on the other hand, is a commercial tool primarily used for functional testing with a focus on web-based applications, offering comprehensive test management and reporting capabilities. Choose Apache JMeter for performance testing needs and Testrail for functional testing requirements.

Advice on Apache JMeter and Testrail
Ratan Sharmacharya
Needs advice
on
Apache JMeterApache JMeter
and
Loader.ioLoader.io

I have a team that is not heavy on programming skills. I am looking for a load testing tool that is easy to use. Preferably, the tool should be a record and playback tool without much programming. Also, the tool should be able to test APIs apart from web-based applications. What tool should I opt for?

See more
Replies (2)
Deepak Naik
Product Owner at Digite Infotech Private Limited · | 3 upvotes · 33.4K views

My choice would be Apache JMeter, It's free and opensource plus it comes with lots of plugins and extendability. Apache JMeter needs a small amount of a learning curve and a basic understanding of Network, Protocols (TCP/IP ports, HTTP(S) and REST/SOAP, etc.) for initial setup. But it doesn't require programming skills. it has a nice record and playback option. You can still carry on without the developer skillset if you follow these steps. 1. Take backup. 2. Start recording and interact with the application. 3. stop recording and save the test case. This will give you your test-bed, after this, after these steps, every time just do Restore from backup and then Playback and observer results.

If you have longer recordings then an understanding of how to modify the recorded scripts will come handy.

For some of the advanced features such as Configuring variables, implementing loops, throttling adding think time, and automating test scaling to the number of users will require good planning of test scenarios and a Developer experience but this is true for any tool (even loader.io)

See more
Pepe Ruiz
Head of Content at k6.io · | 2 upvotes · 33.1K views
Recommends
on
k6k6

Disclaimer: I work at k6, and I recommend you try our tool.

It might require some coding skills, but we support a few options to record a user session to autogenerate the load test. Read How to record a browser session with k6 OSS.

The k6 Cloud also supports recording a user session with a Browser Extension. Additionally, it provides a Test Builder UI to generate a load test for testing APIs.

If you have questions or need help, you can ask on Slack and the Community forum.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Apache JMeter
Pros of Testrail
  • 5
    Requires no programming knowledge
  • 3
    Supports distributed
  • 2
    Open-source
  • 10
    Designed for testers
  • 6
    Easy to use
  • 5
    Intutive
  • 5
    Easy Intergration
  • 3
    Customer Support
  • 1
    Integration to jira

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Apache JMeter
Cons of Testrail
  • 1
    It's GUI-first
  • 1
    Too complicated
  • 4
    Pricey

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is Apache JMeter?

It is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance. It was originally designed for testing Web Applications but has since expanded to other test functions.

What is Testrail?

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Apache JMeter?
What companies use Testrail?
See which teams inside your own company are using Apache JMeter or Testrail.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Apache JMeter?
What tools integrate with Testrail?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Apache JMeter and Testrail?
BlazeMeter
Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>
Selenium
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
Postman
It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.
Gatling
Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.
Locust
Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.
See all alternatives