Apache JMeter vs Testrail

Overview

Testrail

Stacks218

Followers265

Votes30

Apache JMeter

Stacks435

Followers285

Votes10

Apache JMeter vs Testrail: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache JMeter and Testrail are two popular tools used in software testing. While both tools serve the purpose of testing, there are key differences between them that make them suitable for different scenarios. In this article, we will explore six key differences between Apache JMeter and Testrail.

Functional Testing vs. Performance Testing: One of the major differences between Apache JMeter and Testrail is their primary focus. Apache JMeter is designed primarily for performance testing, helping you evaluate the performance of your software application under various load conditions. On the other hand, Testrail is focused on functional testing, allowing you to systematically test the functionality of your software.
Open-Source vs. Commercial Tool: Apache JMeter is an open-source tool, which means it is freely available for anyone to use and modify. It has a large community of developers and users who actively contribute to its development and support. Testrail, on the other hand, is a commercial tool that requires a paid license for usage. It offers additional features and support that may be beneficial for certain testing scenarios.
Protocol Support: Another significant difference between Apache JMeter and Testrail lies in their protocol support. Apache JMeter supports a wide range of protocols, including HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, JDBC, SOAP, and many more. This makes it suitable for testing different types of applications. On the contrary, Testrail focuses primarily on web-based applications, providing specific features and integrations for web testing.
User Interface and Reporting: The user interface and reporting capabilities of Apache JMeter and Testrail also differ. Apache JMeter offers a functional, yet somewhat complex, user interface with a wide range of options and configurations. It provides basic reporting capabilities and raw data analysis. On the other hand, Testrail provides a user-friendly interface with intuitive workflows and comprehensive reporting features, making it easier to track and manage test results.
Collaboration and Integration: Collaboration and integration capabilities are also differentiating factors between Apache JMeter and Testrail. Apache JMeter supports collaboration through version control systems like Git, allowing multiple testers to work on the same test plan simultaneously. It can also be integrated with other tools like Jenkins for continuous integration. Testrail, on the other hand, offers built-in collaboration features, allowing testers to collaborate on test cases, track progress, and share information within a centralized platform.
Automation and Test Management: Automation and test management features are more prominent in Testrail compared to Apache JMeter. Testrail provides extensive test case management capabilities, allowing you to organize, document, and track test cases efficiently. It also offers automation features, such as test run scheduling and execution, to streamline the testing process. While Apache JMeter does provide some level of automation support, it is primarily focused on load testing and does not offer dedicated test management functionalities.

In summary, Apache JMeter is an open-source tool focused on performance testing with protocol support for a wide range of applications. Testrail, on the other hand, is a commercial tool primarily used for functional testing with a focus on web-based applications, offering comprehensive test management and reporting capabilities. Choose Apache JMeter for performance testing needs and Testrail for functional testing requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Testrail, Apache JMeter

Ratan

QA Manager at Verisys

Feb 12, 2020

Needs advice

I have a team that is not heavy on programming skills. I am looking for a load testing tool that is easy to use. Preferably, the tool should be a record and playback tool without much programming. Also, the tool should be able to test APIs apart from web-based applications. What tool should I opt for?

36.3k views36.3k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Testrail	Apache JMeter
TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.	It is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance. It was originally designed for testing Web Applications but has since expanded to other test functions.
Efficiently manage test cases, plans and runs;Boost testing productivity significantly;Get real-time insights into your testing progress;Integrates with your issue tracker & test automation	-
Statistics
Stacks 218	Stacks 435
Followers 265	Followers 285
Votes 30	Votes 10
Pros & Cons
Pros 10 Designed for testers 6 Easy to use 5 Easy Intergration 5 Intutive 3 Customer Support Cons 4 Pricey	Pros 5 Requires no programming knowledge 3 Supports distributed 2 Open-source Cons 1 Too complicated 1 It's GUI-first
Integrations
GitHub Jira Visual Studio Pivotal Tracker Bitbucket Lighthouse Mantis Redmine Gemini Bugzilla	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Testrail, Apache JMeter?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

k6

It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.

Locust

Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.

Gatling

Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.

Loader.io

Loader.io is a free load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps/apis with thousands of concurrent connections.

BlazeMeter

Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>

RedLine13

It is a load testing platform that brings the low cost power of the cloud to JMeter and other open source load testing tools.

AWS Device Farm

Run tests across a large selection of physical devices in parallel from various manufacturers with varying hardware, OS versions and form factors.

Flood IO

Performance testing with Flood increases customer satisfaction and confidence in your production apps and reduces business risk.

Blitz

Build bulletproof, scalable solutions with Blitz - a simple and fun service for load testing web apps and APIs in the cloud. Blitz offers powerful yet simple capabilities including continuous monitoring, performance testing and remediation. Blitz enables you to instantly burst up to 50,000 concurrent users against your app in seconds from multiple points of presence around the world.

Related Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs Testrail: What are the differences?

Introduction

Functional Testing vs. Performance Testing: One of the major differences between Apache JMeter and Testrail is their primary focus. Apache JMeter is designed primarily for performance testing, helping you evaluate the performance of your software application under various load conditions. On the other hand, Testrail is focused on functional testing, allowing you to systematically test the functionality of your software.
Open-Source vs. Commercial Tool: Apache JMeter is an open-source tool, which means it is freely available for anyone to use and modify. It has a large community of developers and users who actively contribute to its development and support. Testrail, on the other hand, is a commercial tool that requires a paid license for usage. It offers additional features and support that may be beneficial for certain testing scenarios.
Protocol Support: Another significant difference between Apache JMeter and Testrail lies in their protocol support. Apache JMeter supports a wide range of protocols, including HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, JDBC, SOAP, and many more. This makes it suitable for testing different types of applications. On the contrary, Testrail focuses primarily on web-based applications, providing specific features and integrations for web testing.
User Interface and Reporting: The user interface and reporting capabilities of Apache JMeter and Testrail also differ. Apache JMeter offers a functional, yet somewhat complex, user interface with a wide range of options and configurations. It provides basic reporting capabilities and raw data analysis. On the other hand, Testrail provides a user-friendly interface with intuitive workflows and comprehensive reporting features, making it easier to track and manage test results.
Collaboration and Integration: Collaboration and integration capabilities are also differentiating factors between Apache JMeter and Testrail. Apache JMeter supports collaboration through version control systems like Git, allowing multiple testers to work on the same test plan simultaneously. It can also be integrated with other tools like Jenkins for continuous integration. Testrail, on the other hand, offers built-in collaboration features, allowing testers to collaborate on test cases, track progress, and share information within a centralized platform.
Automation and Test Management: Automation and test management features are more prominent in Testrail compared to Apache JMeter. Testrail provides extensive test case management capabilities, allowing you to organize, document, and track test cases efficiently. It also offers automation features, such as test run scheduling and execution, to streamline the testing process. While Apache JMeter does provide some level of automation support, it is primarily focused on load testing and does not offer dedicated test management functionalities.

Apache JMeter vs Testrail

Overview