StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. React vs Vue.js vs jQuery

React vs Vue.js vs jQuery

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
jQuery
jQuery
Stacks195.3K
Followers70.6K
Votes6.6K
GitHub Stars59.6K
Forks20.5K
Vue.js
Vue.js
Stacks55.5K
Followers44.7K
Votes1.6K
GitHub Stars209.7K
Forks33.8K

React vs Vue.js vs jQuery: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between React, Vue.js, and jQuery. React, Vue.js, and jQuery are all popular JavaScript libraries/frameworks used for building web applications. While they all serve the purpose of enhancing the user interface and interactivity of a website, they have some fundamental differences in terms of their approach, architecture, and features.

  1. Declarative vs Imperative: One of the key differences between React and Vue.js with jQuery is their programming paradigm. React and Vue.js are both declarative, which means they focus on describing what the UI should look like and handle the underlying updates automatically. On the other hand, jQuery follows an imperative approach, where developers have to manually manipulate the DOM and trigger events to achieve desired UI changes.

  2. Virtual DOM vs Manipulating the DOM: React and Vue.js use a virtual DOM (Document Object Model) to efficiently update only the necessary parts of the UI. They compare the virtual DOM with the real DOM and make optimized updates, resulting in better performance. jQuery, on the other hand, directly manipulates the real DOM, which can be less efficient for large-scale applications and frequent UI updates.

  3. Component-Based vs Non-component-Based: React and Vue.js both follow a component-based architecture, where the UI is divided into reusable components. This promotes reusability, maintainability, and modularity in the codebase. jQuery, however, does not have a built-in component-based approach and relies on manipulating individual elements directly.

  4. Learning Curve: React and Vue.js have a steeper learning curve compared to jQuery. Both React and Vue.js introduce additional concepts and syntax, such as JSX (React) and Vue components, which may require some time for developers to grasp. On the other hand, jQuery has a simpler and more straightforward syntax, making it easier for beginners to understand and start using.

  5. Size and Performance: React and Vue.js have a larger footprint in terms of file size compared to jQuery. This is mainly due to the additional functionalities, virtual DOM, and component-based architecture they offer. jQuery, being a smaller library, can be more suitable for smaller projects or situations where performance is a critical factor.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: React and Vue.js have vibrant and active communities, with a vast ecosystem of open-source libraries, tools, and resources available. They are backed by large companies (React by Facebook, Vue.js by the Vue.js core team) and have extensive documentation and community support. jQuery, although still widely used, has a relatively smaller community and ecosystem compared to React and Vue.js.

In summary, React and Vue.js are both modern JavaScript frameworks that follow declarative and component-based approaches, while jQuery is a popular library that follows an imperative and non-component-based approach. React and Vue.js offer better performance, scalability, and modularity but come with a steeper learning curve. jQuery, on the other hand, is simpler to learn and has a smaller file size, making it suitable for smaller projects or situations where performance is critical and advanced functionality is not required.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, jQuery, Vue.js

John Clifford
John Clifford

Software Engineer at CircleYY

Jun 8, 2020

Decided

I used React not just because it is more popular than Angular. But the declarative and composition it gives out of the box is fascinating and React.js is just a very small UI library and you can build anything on top of it.

Composing components is the strongest asset of React for me as it can breakdown your application into smaller pieces which makes it easy to reuse and scale.

455k views455k
Comments
José
José

Head of Engineering & Development at Chiper

Jun 23, 2020

Decided

It is a very versatile library that provides great development speed. Although, with a bad organization, maintaining projects can be a disaster. With a good architecture, this does not happen.

Angular is obviously powerful and robust. I do not rule it out for any future application, in fact with the arrival of micro frontends and cross-functional teams I think it could be useful. However, if I have to build a stack from scratch again, I'm left with react.

592k views592k
Comments
Máté
Máté

Senior developer at Self-employed

May 28, 2020

Decided

Svelte is everything a developer could ever want for flexible, scalable frontend development. I feel like React has reached a maturity level where there needs to be new syntactic sugar added (I'm looking at you, hooks!). I love how Svelte sets out to rebuild a new language to write interfaces in from the ground up.

311k views311k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
jQuery
jQuery
Vue.js
Vue.js

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
-
Reactivity; Components; Modularity; Animations; Routing; Stability; Extendable Data bindings; Plain JS object models; Build UI by composing components; Mix & matching small libraries
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
59.6K
GitHub Stars
209.7K
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
20.5K
GitHub Forks
33.8K
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
195.3K
Stacks
55.5K
Followers
147.0K
Followers
70.6K
Followers
44.7K
Votes
4.1K
Votes
6.6K
Votes
1.6K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Pros
  • 1263
    Cross-browser
  • 957
    Dom manipulation
  • 809
    Power
  • 660
    Open source
  • 610
    Plugins
Cons
  • 6
    Large size
  • 5
    Encourages DOM as primary data source
  • 5
    Sometimes inconsistent API
  • 2
    Live events is overly complex feature
Pros
  • 294
    Simple and easy to start with
  • 230
    Good documentation
  • 196
    Components
  • 131
    Simple the best
  • 100
    Simplified AngularJS
Cons
  • 9
    Less Common Place
  • 5
    YXMLvsHTML Markup
  • 3
    Don't support fragments
  • 3
    Only support programatically multiple root nodes

What are some alternatives to React, jQuery, Vue.js?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Mithril

Mithril

Mithril is around 12kb gzipped thanks to its small, focused, API. It provides a templating engine with a virtual DOM diff implementation for performant rendering, utilities for high-level modelling via functional composition, as well as support for routing and componentization.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase