StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Query Languages
  5. JSON API vs OpenAPI

JSON API vs OpenAPI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JSON API
JSON API
Stacks185
Followers197
Votes0
OpenAPI
OpenAPI
Stacks697
Followers458
Votes6
GitHub Stars19.5K
Forks7.0K

JSON API vs OpenAPI: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code snippet, we will discuss the key differences between JSON API and OpenAPI. JSON API and OpenAPI are two different specifications that are used in web development and APIs. Understanding their differences is crucial for developers to choose the most suitable specification for their projects.

  1. Data Structure and Flexibility: JSON API is primarily focused on defining a set of conventions for structuring and representing data in APIs. It provides a standardized way of structuring the API responses, relationships between resources, and includes features like sorting, filtering, and pagination. On the other hand, OpenAPI is a complete specification that not only defines the structure of API responses but also covers various aspects of the API like request and response validations, endpoints, authentication methods, and more. OpenAPI offers more flexibility in defining the API, while JSON API is more focused on the data structure.

  2. Versatility and Scope: JSON API is a specification specifically designed for building APIs that expose resources and their relationships. It aims to provide a clear and consistent way of handling and manipulating resources through APIs. OpenAPI, on the other hand, is a broader specification that encompasses not only resource handling but also covers documentation, versioning, authentication, security, and other aspects of building APIs. OpenAPI has a wider scope than JSON API, making it a more versatile specification.

  3. Community and Adoption: JSON API has gained significant popularity and adoption among developers due to its simplicity, consistency, and focus on resource handling. It has a strong and active community that continuously supports and improves the specification. OpenAPI, being a more comprehensive specification, also has a large community but its adoption may vary based on the project requirements. JSON API generally has a higher adoption rate due to its specific focus on resource handling.

  4. Tooling and Ecosystem: JSON API has a mature ecosystem with various libraries, frameworks, and tooling built specifically for working with JSON API. These tools provide easy integration, validation, and serialization/deserialization of JSON API compliant data. OpenAPI also has a wide range of tooling and ecosystem support, but it covers a broader spectrum and may require additional tools or libraries for specific requirements. JSON API has a more specialized tooling and ecosystem compared to OpenAPI.

  5. Versioning and Maintenance: JSON API does not have a built-in versioning mechanism, and developers have to handle versioning using other approaches or conventions. OpenAPI, on the other hand, provides a standardized way of versioning APIs. The OpenAPI specification allows the inclusion of version information for individual endpoints, making it easier to handle backward compatibility and version management. OpenAPI offers a more streamlined approach to versioning and maintenance compared to JSON API.

  6. Interoperability: JSON API focuses on conventions and standardized data structures, which promotes better interoperability between different API implementations. It ensures that APIs built using JSON API specification can work seamlessly across different platforms and frameworks. OpenAPI also promotes interoperability by providing a standard way of defining APIs and their interactions. However, OpenAPI's broader scope may introduce more variations and customizations, affecting the interoperability to some extent. JSON API has a stronger emphasis on interoperability than OpenAPI.

In summary, JSON API is a specification primarily focused on data structure and resource handling, while OpenAPI is a broader specification covering various aspects of API development. JSON API is widely adopted, has a specialized ecosystem and promotes better interoperability, while OpenAPI offers more versatility, versioning support, and a comprehensive approach to API documentation and management. Developers should choose the specification based on their project requirements and priorities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JSON API
JSON API
OpenAPI
OpenAPI

It is most widely used data format for data interchange on the web. This data interchange can happen between two computers applications at different geographical locations or running within same hardware machine.

It is a publicly available application programming interface that provides developers with programmatic access to a proprietary software application or web service.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
19.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
7.0K
Stacks
185
Stacks
697
Followers
197
Followers
458
Votes
0
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 1
    Easy to read the template generated
  • 1
    Supports caching
  • 1
    Supports authentication
  • 1
    Supports versioning
  • 1
    Easy to learn
Integrations
No integrations available
Stoplight
Stoplight
PayPal
PayPal
Kong
Kong
SAP HANA
SAP HANA
Talend
Talend
Mule runtime engine
Mule runtime engine

What are some alternatives to JSON API, OpenAPI?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

GraphQL

GraphQL

GraphQL is a data query language and runtime designed and used at Facebook to request and deliver data to mobile and web apps since 2012.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Prisma

Prisma

Prisma is an open-source database toolkit. It replaces traditional ORMs and makes database access easy with an auto-generated query builder for TypeScript & Node.js.

PostGraphile

PostGraphile

Execute one command (or mount one Node.js middleware) and get an instant high-performance GraphQL API for your PostgreSQL database

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase