StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. Julia vs R

Julia vs R

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

R Language
R Language
Stacks3.9K
Followers1.9K
Votes418
Julia
Julia
Stacks666
Followers677
Votes171
GitHub Stars47.9K
Forks5.7K

Julia vs R: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Julia and R are programming languages commonly used in data analysis and scientific computing. While both languages have their distinct features and strengths, there are several key differences between them. This Markdown code provides a concise comparison of these differences.

  1. Performance: Julia is known for its high performance and speed, making it ideal for computationally intensive tasks. It uses a just-in-time (JIT) compilation approach that allows it to dynamically compile code while executing it, leading to faster execution times. On the other hand, R has traditionally been slower due to its interpreted nature and lack of native support for parallel computing. However, recent advancements in R packages, such as 'dplyr' and 'data.table', have improved its performance.

  2. Language Design: The design philosophy of Julia revolves around providing a unified language that is both user-friendly and efficient. It aims to bridge the gap between high-level dynamic languages like Python and low-level compiled languages like C/C++. Julia achieves this through multiple dispatch, which allows functions to behave differently based on the types of their arguments. In contrast, R is a domain-specific language primarily focused on statistical analysis and modeling. It provides a wide range of built-in statistical functions and packages, making it convenient for data analysis tasks.

  3. Syntax: Julia has a relatively modern and mathematically inclined syntax. It uses mathematical notations, such as Unicode operators, that make code more concise and readable. Julia also supports multiple programming paradigms, including functional, procedural, and object-oriented programming. On the other hand, R has a syntax that is more similar to traditional programming languages like C. It uses a combination of functions and operators for computations, making it convenient for statisticians and data analysts familiar with traditional statistical software.

  4. Community and Package Ecosystem: R has a vibrant and extensive community, providing a vast collection of packages for statistical analysis, data visualization, and machine learning. The Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) hosts thousands of packages, making it easy to find and install packages in R. Julia, although relatively new, has been rapidly growing its package ecosystem. The Julia package manager, known as 'Pkg', provides a convenient way to install and manage packages. The Julia community also focuses on developing high-quality packages, making it comparable to the R ecosystem.

  5. Interoperability: R has a good level of interoperability with other programming languages. It supports interfaces with languages like C, C++, Python, and Java, allowing users to leverage existing code and libraries. Julia, on the other hand, has built-in support for calling C and Fortran code directly, making it easier to integrate with existing libraries. Julia also provides a Python-like syntax for calling Python functions, enabling interoperability with Python code.

  6. Learning Curve: While both languages have their learning curves, R is often considered easier to learn for users with a background in statistics and data analysis. Its syntax and vast range of statistical functions make it intuitive for statisticians. Julia, on the other hand, requires a deeper understanding of programming concepts and may pose a steeper learning curve for novice programmers. However, Julia's simplicity and consistency in syntax make it easier to write and read complex algorithms and code.

In summary, Julia offers high performance with its JIT compilation and unified language design, while R provides a comprehensive package ecosystem and ease of use for statisticians. Understanding the key differences between these languages can help determine the most suitable option for specific data analysis and scientific computing tasks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on R Language, Julia

Alexander
Alexander

Senior researcher at MIPT

Oct 27, 2020

Decided

After writing a project in Julia we decided to stick with Kotlin. Julia is a nice language and has superb REPL support, but poor tooling and the lack of reproducibility of the program runs makes it too expensive to work with. Kotlin on the other hand now has nice Jupyter support, which mostly covers REPL requirements.

188k views188k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

R Language
R Language
Julia
Julia

R provides a wide variety of statistical (linear and nonlinear modelling, classical statistical tests, time-series analysis, classification, clustering, ...) and graphical techniques, and is highly extensible.

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
47.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.7K
Stacks
3.9K
Stacks
666
Followers
1.9K
Followers
677
Votes
418
Votes
171
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 86
    Data analysis
  • 64
    Graphics and data visualization
  • 55
    Free
  • 45
    Great community
  • 38
    Flexible statistical analysis toolkit
Cons
  • 6
    Very messy syntax
  • 4
    Tables must fit in RAM
  • 3
    Arrays indices start with 1
  • 2
    Messy syntax for string concatenation
  • 2
    No push command for vectors/lists
Pros
  • 25
    Fast Performance and Easy Experimentation
  • 22
    Designed for parallelism and distributed computation
  • 19
    Free and Open Source
  • 17
    Calling C functions directly
  • 17
    Dynamic Type System
Cons
  • 5
    Immature library management system
  • 4
    Slow program start
  • 3
    JIT compiler is very slow
  • 3
    Poor backwards compatibility
  • 2
    Bad tooling
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub
Azure Web App for Containers
Azure Web App for Containers
GitLab
GitLab
Slack
Slack
C++
C++
Rust
Rust
C lang
C lang
Stack Overflow
Stack Overflow
vscode.dev
vscode.dev
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to R Language, Julia?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot