Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Karma

2.5K
602
+ 1
181
Wallaby.js

11
18
+ 1
0
Add tool

Karma vs Wallaby.js: What are the differences?

### Introduction
In the world of frontend development, tools like Karma and Wallaby.js are often used for testing JavaScript code. Understanding the key differences between these two tools is essential for choosing the right one for your projects.

1. **Execution Speed**: Wallaby.js is known for its blazing fast execution speed, providing real-time feedback on code changes almost instantaneously. On the other hand, Karma may take more time to run tests, especially with larger test suites.

2. **Continuous Testing**: Wallaby.js is designed to provide continuous testing, meaning it runs your tests as you write code and provides immediate feedback in your editor. Karma, on the other hand, typically requires manual triggering to run tests.

3. **IDE Integration**: Wallaby.js offers seamless integration with popular code editors like Visual Studio Code and JetBrains products, providing a more convenient testing experience within the editor. Karma, while still compatible with various editors, may require additional configurations for full integration.

4. **Debugging Capabilities**: Wallaby.js provides advanced debugging capabilities, allowing developers to debug their tests directly within their editor. Karma, on the other hand, may require additional setup and tools for efficient debugging.

5. **Community Support**: Karma has been around for longer and has a larger community of users, leading to more extensive documentation, tutorials, and third-party plugins. Wallaby.js, while growing in popularity, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for support.

6. **Cost**: While Karma is an open-source tool, Wallaby.js offers both free and paid versions with additional features like performance optimizations, parallel testing, and support for various frameworks. Depending on your needs and budget, this difference may influence your choice.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Karma and Wallaby.js, such as execution speed, continuous testing, IDE integration, debugging capabilities, community support, and cost, is crucial for making an informed decision when selecting a testing tool for your JavaScript projects.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Karma
Pros of Wallaby.js
  • 61
    Test Runner
  • 35
    Open source
  • 27
    Continuous Integration
  • 22
    Great for running tests
  • 18
    Test on Real Devices
  • 11
    Backed by google
  • 5
    Easy Debugging
  • 2
    Remote Control
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Karma
    Cons of Wallaby.js
    • 1
      Slow, because tests are run in a real browser
    • 1
      Requires the use of hacks to find tests dynamically
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Karma?

      Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

      What is Wallaby.js?

      It is an intelligent test runner for JavaScript that continuously runs your tests. It reports code coverage and other results directly to your code editor immediately as you change your code.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Karma?
      What companies use Wallaby.js?
      See which teams inside your own company are using Karma or Wallaby.js.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Karma?
      What tools integrate with Wallaby.js?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to Karma and Wallaby.js?
      Jasmine
      Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.
      Jest
      Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.
      Mocha
      Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.
      Protractor
      Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.
      JavaScript
      JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
      See all alternatives