Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Katalon Studio vs Postman: What are the differences?
Introduction
Katalon Studio and Postman are powerful tools used for API testing and automation. While both tools serve the same purpose, they have key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore the six main differences between Katalon Studio and Postman.
Testing Capabilities: Katalon Studio is a comprehensive test automation solution that supports both API and web testing. It allows users to perform end-to-end testing by integrating API tests with UI tests. On the other hand, Postman primarily focuses on API testing and does not provide extensive UI testing capabilities.
Scripting Language: Katalon Studio supports multiple scripting languages such as Groovy and JavaScript, allowing testers to write complex test scripts with ease. Meanwhile, Postman utilizes JavaScript to write scripts, which may be a limiting factor for testers who prefer other scripting languages.
Collaboration and Team Management: Katalon Studio offers built-in collaboration and team management features, enabling testers to work collaboratively on shared projects. It allows for easier project setup, test case version control, and test execution across different machines. Postman, on the other hand, lacks built-in collaboration features, making it less suitable for teams working on larger projects.
Rich Test Execution Options: Katalon Studio offers a wide range of test execution options, supporting both local execution and distributed test execution through integration with various testing frameworks. It also supports parallel test execution, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously for faster test execution. In contrast, Postman primarily focuses on local test execution and lacks the advanced test execution capabilities of Katalon Studio.
User-Friendly Interface: Katalon Studio provides a user-friendly interface that is suitable for both technical and non-technical users. It offers a comprehensive test case management system and a visual test scripting feature, making it easy to create and maintain test cases. Postman, on the other hand, has a more technical interface focused on APIs, which may require users to have a deeper understanding of API concepts.
Reporting and Analytics: Katalon Studio provides detailed test reports and analytics, allowing users to track the execution status, identify bottlenecks, and generate comprehensive test reports. It also integrates with third-party analytics tools for advanced reporting and analysis. Postman, on the other hand, offers basic reporting capabilities, but it may lack the advanced analytics features provided by Katalon Studio.
In Summary, Katalon Studio is a comprehensive test automation solution that supports both API and web testing, offers rich collaboration and test execution capabilities, provides a user-friendly interface, and allows for detailed reporting and analytics. Postman, on the other hand, primarily focuses on API testing, has scripting limitations, lacks built-in collaboration features, and offers basic reporting capabilities.
I want to do api testing using any one of this tool. I need to run the test scripts whenever new collection has been given. So if i run my test in Postman, i need to add test scripts manually every time i get new collections. Guide me is there any alternate solutions to reuse my test scripts in postman or which one is best either Katalon Studio or postman..
Swagger can help you for that which will generate api documentation.
Postman is good for manual testing. Katalon Studio is good for automation api testing.
From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"
I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).
I use Swagger UI because it's an easy tool for end-consumers to visualize and test our APIs. It focuses on that ! And it's directly embedded and delivered with the APIs. Postman's built-in tools aren't bad, but their main focus isn't the documentation and also, they are hosted outside the project.
I recommend Postman because it's easy to use with history option. Also, it has very great features like runner, collections, test scripts runners, defining environment variables and simple exporting and importing data.
Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.
Pros of Katalon Studio
Pros of Postman
- Easy to use490
- Great tool369
- Makes developing rest api's easy peasy276
- Easy setup, looks good156
- The best api workflow out there144
- It's the best53
- History feature53
- Adds real value to my workflow44
- Great interface that magically predicts your needs43
- The best in class app35
- Can save and share script12
- Fully featured without looking cluttered10
- Collections8
- Option to run scrips8
- Global/Environment Variables8
- Shareable Collections7
- Dead simple and useful. Excellent7
- Dark theme easy on the eyes7
- Awesome customer support6
- Great integration with newman6
- Documentation5
- Simple5
- The test script is useful5
- Saves responses4
- This has simplified my testing significantly4
- Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,34
- Easy as pie4
- API-network3
- I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis3
- Mocking API calls with predefined response3
- Now supports GraphQL2
- Postman Runner CI Integration2
- Easy to setup, test and provides test storage2
- Continuous integration using newman2
- Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable2
- Runner2
- Graph2
- <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Katalon Studio
Cons of Postman
- Stores credentials in HTTP10
- Bloated features and UI9
- Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens8
- Poor GraphQL support7
- Expensive5
- Not free after 5 users3
- Can't prompt for per-request variables3
- Import swagger1
- Support websocket1
- Import curl1