Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Keepalived vs nginx: What are the differences?
<Write Introduction here>
Configuration: Keepalived is primarily used for high availability solutions with Its main function being to monitor the health of servers and switches, ensuring uptime for critical services. On the other hand, Nginx is a web server and reverse proxy that focuses on efficiently serving web content and managing HTTP traffic.
Load Balancing: Keepalived supports both Layer 4 (TCP/UDP) and Layer 7 (HTTP) load balancing, making it suitable for a wider range of applications. Nginx, however, excels in Layer 7 load balancing, providing advanced features for routing traffic based on various criteria.
Monitoring: Keepalived offers extensive monitoring capabilities for server health and service availability, enabling automatic failover and maintaining high service uptime. Nginx, while able to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently, lacks native support for comprehensive server monitoring and failover mechanisms.
High Availability Features: Keepalived specializes in providing high availability solutions through techniques like VRRP (Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol) and VSMTP, ensuring services remain online even in the event of server failures. Nginx, although capable of handling high traffic loads, does not inherently provide the same level of automatic failover and redundancy features.
Application Support: Keepalived is commonly used for critical network services such as DNS, email, and database servers that require continuous availability. Nginx, on the other hand, is widely used for web applications, caching, and as a reverse proxy for HTTP servers, catering more to web-specific needs.
Scalability: Keepalived can be scaled horizontally by adding more instances to distribute the workload and improve fault tolerance, ensuring high availability across multiple nodes. In contrast, Nginx helps in scaling web applications by efficiently handling concurrent connections and distributing traffic, but its focus remains more on web server functionalities rather than high availability scaling.
In Summary, Keepalived and Nginx differ in their focus on high availability solutions for network services and efficient web traffic management, respectively, with variations in load balancing capabilities, monitoring features, and application support.
I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!
I would pick nginx over both IIS and Apace HTTP Server any day. Combine it with docker, and as you grow maybe even traefik, and you'll have a really flexible solution for serving http content where you can take sites and projects up and down without effort, easily move it between systems and dont have to handle any dependencies on your actual local machine.
From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."
I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.
I use nginx because its more flexible and easy to configure
I use Apache HTTP Server because it's intuitive, comprehensive, well-documented, and just works
Pros of Keepalived
- Load Balancer2
- Extremely fast (IPVS)2
- 2 nodes HA cluster management1
- Virtual IP HA with VRRP1
Pros of NGINX
- High-performance http server1.4K
- Performance893
- Easy to configure730
- Open source607
- Load balancer530
- Free289
- Scalability288
- Web server226
- Simplicity175
- Easy setup136
- Content caching30
- Web Accelerator21
- Capability15
- Fast14
- High-latency12
- Predictability12
- Reverse Proxy8
- The best of them7
- Supports http/27
- Great Community5
- Lots of Modules5
- Enterprise version5
- High perfomance proxy server4
- Embedded Lua scripting3
- Streaming media delivery3
- Streaming media3
- Reversy Proxy3
- Blash2
- GRPC-Web2
- Lightweight2
- Fast and easy to set up2
- Slim2
- saltstack2
- Virtual hosting1
- Narrow focus. Easy to configure. Fast1
- Along with Redis Cache its the Most superior1
- Ingress controller1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Keepalived
Cons of NGINX
- Advanced features require subscription10