Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Ktor

162
325
+ 1
24
Micronaut Framework

180
324
+ 1
52
Add tool

Ktor vs Micronaut Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Ktor and Micronaut Framework are two popular frameworks used for building web applications in different programming languages. Both frameworks provide efficient and effective ways to develop high-performance applications. However, there are key differences between the two frameworks that set them apart.

  1. Language Support: Ktor supports Kotlin, while Micronaut Framework supports multiple languages such as Java, Groovy, and Kotlin. This language support in Micronaut Framework makes it more versatile and accessible for developers who prefer different programming languages.

  2. Runtime Performance: Micronaut Framework uses compile-time dependency injection and AOT (Ahead Of Time) compilation, which results in faster startup times and lower memory footprint. On the other hand, Ktor uses runtime dependency injection, which may impact runtime performance compared to Micronaut Framework.

  3. Configuration and Convention over Configuration: While both frameworks allow configuration, Ktor relies more on convention over configuration, where developers need to follow certain conventions to reduce configuration code. Micronaut Framework, on the other hand, provides more configuration options and allows developers to override conventions easily.

  4. Cloud-Native Support: Micronaut Framework offers native support for building cloud-native applications, which includes features like HTTP/2, service discovery, and cloud-specific integrations. Ktor, while it can be used in cloud-native environments, lacks built-in support for these specific cloud-related features.

  5. Extensibility and Plugins: Ktor has a more lightweight and modular architecture that allows developers to pick and choose only the required features. However, Micronaut Framework provides a comprehensive set of features and plugins out of the box, reducing the need for additional third-party libraries or dependencies.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Both frameworks have active communities and growing ecosystems. However, Ktor being a relatively newer framework, has a smaller community compared to the more established Micronaut Framework. This may result in Ktor having fewer resources, tutorials, and community support, although it is constantly gaining popularity.

In Summary, Ktor and Micronaut Framework differ in language support, runtime performance, configuration approaches, cloud-native support, extensibility, and community size. These differences make each framework suitable for different use cases and preferences.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Ktor
Pros of Micronaut Framework
  • 8
    Simple & Small
  • 7
    Kotlin native
  • 6
    Light weight
  • 3
    High performance
  • 12
    Compilable to machine code
  • 8
    Tiny memory footprint
  • 7
    Open source
  • 7
    Almost instantaneous startup
  • 6
    Tiny compiled code size
  • 4
    High Escalability
  • 2
    Minimal overhead
  • 2
    Hasn't Servlet API
  • 2
    Simplified reactive programming
  • 1
    Serverless support
  • 1
    Jakarta EE

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Ktor
Cons of Micronaut Framework
  • 2
    Not self-explanatory: relies on Kotlin "magic"
  • 2
    Relatively fresh technology - not a lot of expertise
  • 3
    No hot reload

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Ktor?

It is a framework for building asynchronous servers and clients in connected systems using the Kotlin programming language.

What is Micronaut Framework?

It is a modern, JVM-based, full-stack framework for building modular, easily testable microservice and serverless applications. It features a Dependency Injection and Aspect-Oriented Programming runtime that uses no reflection.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jobs that mention Ktor and Micronaut Framework as a desired skillset
What companies use Ktor?
What companies use Micronaut Framework?
See which teams inside your own company are using Ktor or Micronaut Framework.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Ktor?
What tools integrate with Micronaut Framework?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Ktor and Micronaut Framework?
Spring
A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.
Golang
Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.
Spring Boot
Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.
Retrofit
Retrofit turns your HTTP API into a Java interface
Javalin
Javalin started as a fork of the Spark framework but quickly turned into a ground-up rewrite influenced by express.js. Both of these web frameworks are inspired by the modern micro web framework grandfather: Sinatra, so if you’re coming from Ruby then Javalin shouldn’t feel too unfamiliar.
See all alternatives