StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Laravel vs Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Laravel vs Node.js vs Spring-Boot

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Laravel
Laravel
Stacks28.7K
Followers23.7K
Votes3.9K
GitHub Stars82.6K
Forks24.6K
Node.js
Node.js
Stacks200.4K
Followers164.5K
Votes8.5K
GitHub Stars114.1K
Forks33.7K
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Stacks26.7K
Followers24.3K
Votes1.0K
GitHub Stars78.9K
Forks41.6K

Laravel vs Node.js vs Spring-Boot: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Laravel, Node.js, and Spring-Boot

Laravel is a popular PHP framework, Node.js is a JavaScript runtime environment, and Spring Boot is a Java-based framework. While all three are used for web development, there are key differences between them.

  1. Language and Framework: Laravel is built using PHP, Node.js uses JavaScript, and Spring-Boot is developed using Java. This means that each framework requires different programming languages and has its own syntax and conventions.

  2. Scalability and Performance: Node.js is known for its high scalability and performance due to its asynchronous and event-driven architecture, allowing it to handle large numbers of concurrent connections efficiently. On the other hand, Laravel and Spring-Boot are more suitable for small to medium-sized applications.

  3. Community and Ecosystem: Node.js has a vast and active open-source community with a wide range of libraries and packages available through NPM (Node Package Manager). Laravel also has a large community and a rich ecosystem, with a focus on elegant and developer-friendly code. Spring-Boot, being a Java-based framework, benefits from the extensive Java community and ecosystem.

  4. Development Speed: Laravel is known for its rapid application development capabilities, providing a rich set of ready-to-use features and tools. Spring-Boot also promotes faster development by utilizing an opinionated approach and providing automated configuration. Node.js may require more manual setup and configuration due to its lightweight nature.

  5. Learning Curve: Laravel provides a clean and intuitive syntax, making it easier for beginners to learn. Node.js, being based on JavaScript, can also be relatively easy to learn for developers with JavaScript experience. Spring-Boot, being a Java-based framework, may have a steeper learning curve for developers with no or limited Java knowledge.

  6. Use Cases and Industry Adoption: Laravel is widely adopted in the PHP community and is commonly used for building small to medium-sized web applications. Node.js is often used for building real-time applications, APIs, and microservices due to its high scalability and non-blocking I/O. Spring-Boot is favored for building enterprise-level applications and is widely used in the Java community.

In Summary, Laravel is a PHP framework known for its rapid development capabilities, Node.js is a scalable and performant JavaScript runtime environment, and Spring-Boot is a Java-based framework suitable for enterprise-level applications. Each framework has its own unique strengths and is preferred for specific use cases in the web development industry.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Laravel, Node.js, Spring Boot

Shivam
Shivam

AVP - Business at VAYUZ Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Mar 25, 2020

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsJavaJavaRailsRails

Hi Community! Trust everyone is keeping safe. I am exploring the idea of building a #Neobank (App) with end-to-end banking capabilities. In the process of exploring this space, I have come across multiple Apps (N26, Revolut, Monese, etc) and explored their stacks in detail. The confusion remains to be the Backend Tech to be used?

What would you go with considering all of the languages such as Node.js Java Rails Python are suggested by some person or the other. As a general trend, I have noticed the usage of Node with React on the front or Node with a combination of Kotlin and Swift. Please suggest what would be the right approach!

915k views915k
Comments
Sachin
Sachin

Mar 25, 2020

Needs advice

Which is better to learn first as a beginner? Is it true that django is going out of the trend?

I was thinking to learn nodejs but after some thoughts I moved to django and learned most of the basics. Should I learn django more deeply or else drop the django learning and start learning nodejs from scratch?

Please help.

283k views283k
Comments
abderrahmane
abderrahmane

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

I am a front-end guy and in the last month I've been trynig to be learn backend in python. I think python is a great language to but when i start to learn django I didn't like it because everythong is already done for you, you dont need to do much make it works and I like coding thing that take me time. I've been thinking about switching to another programing language or just learn Node js and stick with it. I need to know if django is that easy.

136k views136k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Laravel
Laravel
Node.js
Node.js
Spring Boot
Spring Boot

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Template Engine; MVC Architecture Support; Eloquent ORM (Object Relational Mapping); Security; Artisan; Libraries & Modular; Database Migration System; Unit-Testing
--
Statistics
GitHub Stars
82.6K
GitHub Stars
114.1K
GitHub Stars
78.9K
GitHub Forks
24.6K
GitHub Forks
33.7K
GitHub Forks
41.6K
Stacks
28.7K
Stacks
200.4K
Stacks
26.7K
Followers
23.7K
Followers
164.5K
Followers
24.3K
Votes
3.9K
Votes
8.5K
Votes
1.0K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 556
    Clean architecture
  • 393
    Growing community
  • 371
    Composer friendly
  • 345
    Open source
  • 326
    The only framework to consider for php
Cons
  • 54
    PHP
  • 33
    Too many dependency
  • 23
    Slower than the other two
  • 17
    A lot of static method calls for convenience
  • 15
    Too many include
Pros
  • 1439
    Npm
  • 1279
    Javascript
  • 1129
    Great libraries
  • 1012
    High-performance
  • 805
    Open source
Cons
  • 46
    Bound to a single CPU
  • 45
    New framework every day
  • 40
    Lots of terrible examples on the internet
  • 33
    Asynchronous programming is the worst
  • 24
    Callback
Pros
  • 149
    Powerful and handy
  • 134
    Easy setup
  • 128
    Java
  • 90
    Spring
  • 85
    Fast
Cons
  • 23
    Heavy weight
  • 18
    Annotation ceremony
  • 13
    Java
  • 11
    Many config files needed
  • 5
    Reactive
Integrations
PHP
PHP
Django
Django
CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
CakePHP
CakePHP
No integrations available
Spring
Spring
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to Laravel, Node.js, Spring Boot?

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

MEAN

MEAN

MEAN (Mongo, Express, Angular, Node) is a boilerplate that provides a nice starting point for MongoDB, Node.js, Express, and AngularJS based applications. It is designed to give you a quick and organized way to start developing MEAN based web apps with useful modules like Mongoose and Passport pre-bundled and configured.

Play

Play

Play Framework makes it easy to build web applications with Java & Scala. Play is based on a lightweight, stateless, web-friendly architecture. Built on Akka, Play provides predictable and minimal resource consumption (CPU, memory, threads) for highly-scalable applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase