Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Liquibase vs MySQL WorkBench: What are the differences?
Key Difference 1: Database Support Liquibase is a database migration tool that supports multiple databases such as Oracle, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and Microsoft SQL Server. It can handle schema changes across different database platforms. On the other hand, MySQL Workbench is a visual tool specifically designed for MySQL database management. It provides an integrated development environment (IDE) for MySQL, allowing users to design, model, and administrate MySQL databases. It primarily focuses on MySQL database operations only.
Key Difference 2: Schema Evolution Liquibase is designed for managing database schema evolution, which includes creating, modifying, and updating database schemas. It allows developers to define changes in a versioned and repeatable manner, making it easier to manage and track database changes over time. In contrast, MySQL Workbench provides a visual interface and SQL editor for designing and creating database schemas, but it does not have built-in capabilities for tracking and managing schema changes like Liquibase.
Key Difference 3: Automation and Collaboration Liquibase provides an automated way to apply database schema changes through its command-line interface or API integrations. It supports automation techniques like Continuous Integration/Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) pipelines, making it suitable for collaborative development environments where multiple developers are working on the same database. On the other hand, MySQL Workbench is more suitable for individual developers or small teams who prefer visual designing and manual execution of SQL scripts.
Key Difference 4: Source Control Integration Liquibase is built with source control integration in mind. It allows developers to track and manage database changes using their preferred version control systems like Git, Subversion, or Mercurial. The changesets can be stored alongside application code, ensuring that database changes are properly versioned and synchronized with code changes. In contrast, MySQL Workbench does not provide built-in source control integration, as it primarily focuses on database design and management rather than versioning.
Key Difference 5: Cross-Platform Compatibility Liquibase is a cross-platform tool that can be used on various operating systems such as Windows, macOS, and Linux. It provides a consistent experience regardless of the underlying platform. On the other hand, MySQL Workbench is primarily developed for Windows and macOS environments, although there is also a community-supported version for Linux. Cross-platform compatibility may be a factor to consider when choosing a database management tool.
Key Difference 6: Additional Features Liquibase offers a wide range of additional features beyond basic schema management, including data seeding, database rollback, database comparison and diff, and content-driven database changes. It also supports extensions and custom implementations for advanced use cases. In comparison, MySQL Workbench primarily focuses on database modeling, administration, and SQL development, providing features like database performance monitoring, server configuration, and query optimization tools.
In Summary, Liquibase is a cross-database migration tool that supports schema evolution, automation, source control integration, and provides a wide range of additional features, while MySQL Workbench is a visual tool specifically designed for MySQL database management with a focus on database modeling, administration, and SQL development.
I am looking to build an azure database that connects to my power bi application. Initially, I attempted to create an Azure SQL database, then realized I needed to have SQL Server Management Service in order to manage and connect between Azure SQL <=> Power BI, but since I am on a Mac, I had to use the complex installation as a workaround.
If MySQL Workbench can solve this (as the product is available on Mac), I am more than happy to proceed with this approach if it can achieve the same goal of connecting an azure database with my Power BI application
What I am trying to achieve is fairly simple: have an online cloud database that connects to my Power BI application
I am open to any other solutions as well
Thank you
As others have noted, MySQL Workbench cannot be used instead of Microsoft SQL Manager to manage Azure SQL (MS-SQL Server, I hate that Microsoft uses generic category names for their products).
If you're considering switching to MySQL (Possibly using Azure MySQL managed database), then please not that unlike MS-SQL Server, you do not need the MySQL Workbench to connect your application to MysQL: just use the correct driver for your stack, and you're all set (if your stack is using the .Net platform, use MySQL Connector/NET from: https://dev.mysql.com/downloads/connector/net/ ).
If you do want to use a graphical interface to maintain your MySQL database, then MySQL Workbench is a great choice, but you are not limited to it - as others have mentioned, there is a plethora of competing graphical database management tools that would work just as well with MySQL - one of the advantages of choosing MySQL for your stack is the huge eco-system that is built around it.
As far as I know, MySQL Workbench doesn't handle Microsoft connections, including Azure, you should try Microsoft solutions such as MS VS Code.
Hi Aashwiin, Looking at your stack (https://stackshare.io/aashwiin82347/my-stack), it seems you are using Azure SQL Databases. I'll infer this is Microsoft SQL Server. Therefore, it certainly makes sense you stick with some of the official Microsoft Tooling to connect to it, query and administer it. You'd only be looking at MySQL Query Workbench, if you were running and connecting to a MySQL Database. - That said, could Azure MySQL (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/mysql/overview) be an option for you a this point? MySQL offers great performance. I have been running it at various companies (under AWS/RDS and AWS/Aurora) and have no reason to switch over to anything else. - Decision making-wise, how much do your want your local sql/mysql client to influence/weigh in your architecture/technology decisions, though? This can be a slippery slope. - Alternatively, other clients exist, such as "Table Plus" and allow you to connect, on Mac, to a variety of database servers, including SQL Server. It might be worth giving it a try.
Hello Could you give us a better idea of what Data Base Management System (DBMS) you are using at Azure? MySQL Workbench and Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) are tools developed to exclusively manage MySQL and SQL Server, respectively. If you need to manage multiple DBMS's from a single tool, I sugget you try DBeaver. There are also another alternatives: HeidiSQL, phpMyAdmin, etc. Regarding the DBMS itself, I suggest you stick with SQL Server. In my opinion it's more stable and has more features than MySQL - especially in the Standard and Enterprise editions. Regards, Lawrence
Microsoft provides an application known as Azure Data Studio that runs on Windows, Mac and Linux machines. It provides the ability to manage an Azure SQL database, as well as connecting to standard SQL Server databases. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/azure-data-studio/what-is?view=sql-server-ver15
We were looking a tool that would allow us to do MySQL and PostgreSQL development/administration from a single tool. We decided on Navicat Premium because it can connect to MySQL, MariaDB, MongoDB, SQL Server, Oracle, PostgreSQL, and SQLite databases - and simultaneously. It's also compatible with Amazon RDS and Microsoft Azure, which we also use.
Moreover, we previously experienced the occasional freezing and crashing in MySQL Workbench. It also suffered from a poor design, with certain features being a bit difficult to find. Meanwhile, phpMyAdmin lacked schema visualization tools and seemed better suited to lightweight day to day transactions than some of the big jobs that we needed to do.
Pros of Liquibase
- Great database tool18
- Many DBs supported18
- Easy setup12
- Database independent migration scripts8
- Unique open source tool5
- Database version controller5
- Precondition checking2
- Supports NoSQL and Graph DBs2
Pros of MySQL WorkBench
- Free7
- Simple7
- Easy to use6
- Clean UI5
- Administration and monitoring module3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Liquibase
- Documentation is disorganized5
- No vendor specifics in XML format - needs workarounds5