StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material Design for Angular vs Skeleton

Material Design for Angular vs Skeleton

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Skeleton
Skeleton
Stacks54
Followers100
Votes24
GitHub Stars19.7K
Forks3.1K
Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
Stacks11.8K
Followers9.6K
Votes522
GitHub Stars16.5K
Forks3.4K

Material Design for Angular vs Skeleton: What are the differences?

  1. Layout and Structure: Material Design for Angular provides a more opinionated layout and structure for building web applications, while Skeleton offers a minimal and lightweight grid system without opinionated styles.

  2. Component Library: Material Design for Angular comes with a comprehensive set of pre-built components such as buttons, cards, and sliders, while Skeleton focuses mainly on providing a basic framework for developers to create their own components.

  3. Theming and Customization: Material Design for Angular comes with a well-defined theming system that allows for easy customization and branding of applications, while Skeleton provides minimal theming options, focusing more on simplicity and speed.

  4. Animations and Interactions: Material Design for Angular includes pre-built animations and interactions to enhance user experience, while Skeleton keeps animations minimal and allows developers to add custom interactions as needed.

  5. Browser Support: Material Design for Angular is optimized and fully supported on modern browsers, providing a seamless experience for users, while Skeleton may have limited support for older browsers due to its minimalistic approach.

  6. Development Community: Material Design for Angular has a larger and more active development community, offering extensive resources, tutorials, and support for developers, whereas Skeleton's community may be smaller and resources less readily available.

In Summary, Material Design for Angular offers a comprehensive component library, theming system, and pre-built animations, while Skeleton focuses on minimalism and simplicity in layout and structure, catering to different needs and preferences in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Skeleton
Skeleton
Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular

Skeleton is a small collection of CSS files that can help you rapidly develop sites that look beautiful at any size, be it a 17" laptop screen or an iPhone.

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Responsive Grid Down To Mobile;Fast to Start;Style Agnostic;
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
19.7K
GitHub Stars
16.5K
GitHub Forks
3.1K
GitHub Forks
3.4K
Stacks
54
Stacks
11.8K
Followers
100
Followers
9.6K
Votes
24
Votes
522
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Minimalist
  • 6
    Responsive
  • 4
    Simple
  • 2
    Fantastically straight forward
  • 1
    Lightweight, clean syntax
Cons
  • 0
    Have to make design decisions
Pros
  • 122
    Ui components
  • 63
    Backed by google
  • 51
    Backed by angular
  • 51
    Free
  • 47
    Javascript
Cons
  • 4
    No practical examples
Integrations
No integrations available
AngularJS
AngularJS

What are some alternatives to Skeleton, Material Design for Angular?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase