StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material Design for Angular vs Toolkit

Material Design for Angular vs Toolkit

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
Stacks11.8K
Followers9.6K
Votes522
GitHub Stars16.5K
Forks3.4K
Toolkit
Toolkit
Stacks31
Followers22
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.1K
Forks106

Material Design for Angular vs Toolkit: What are the differences?

Material Design for Angular and Toolkit have specific key differences that differentiate the two frameworks. Let's explore these differences in detail.
  1. Design Philosophy: Material Design for Angular follows the principles and guidelines set by Google's Material Design, offering a modern and clean design language. In contrast, Toolkit focuses on providing a customizable, versatile design system that allows for more creative freedom.

  2. Component Library: Material Design for Angular offers a wide range of pre-built components that follow Material Design guidelines, making it easy to maintain a cohesive design across different projects. On the other hand, Toolkit provides a smaller set of core components but offers more customization options to tailor the design to specific project needs.

  3. Integration with Angular Ecosystem: Material Design for Angular is specifically built for Angular applications, offering seamless integration with Angular features and tools. Toolkit, on the other hand, is more framework agnostic, allowing for integration with a variety of front-end frameworks beyond Angular.

  4. Theming and Styling: While both frameworks provide tools for theming and styling, Material Design for Angular offers a more structured approach with predefined themes and color schemes, following the Material Design language. Toolkit, on the other hand, provides more flexibility in styling and theming, allowing for greater customization.

  5. Community and Support: Material Design for Angular benefits from being supported by the Angular community and Google, providing a large user base and resources for developers. Toolkit, while growing in popularity, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available compared to Material Design for Angular.

  6. Documentation and Learning Curve: Material Design for Angular offers comprehensive documentation and resources for developers to learn and implement the framework effectively. Toolkit, being more versatile and customizable, may have a steeper learning curve due to the flexibility and options available for customization.

In Summary, Material Design for Angular offers a more structured approach following Google's Material Design guidelines, while Toolkit provides more customization options and flexibility in design, catering to different project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
Toolkit
Toolkit

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Toolkit makes use of the latest and greatest technology. This includes HTML5 for semantics, CSS3 for animations and styles, Sass for CSS pre-processing, Gulp for task and package management, and powerful new browser APIs for the JavaScript layer.

-
Mobile First;Responsive Design;Semantic Markup; Flexible Styles;Graceful Degradation;Accelerated Animations
Statistics
GitHub Stars
16.5K
GitHub Stars
1.1K
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
106
Stacks
11.8K
Stacks
31
Followers
9.6K
Followers
22
Votes
522
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 122
    Ui components
  • 63
    Backed by google
  • 51
    Free
  • 51
    Backed by angular
  • 47
    Javascript
Cons
  • 4
    No practical examples
No community feedback yet
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
HTML5
HTML5
jQuery
jQuery
Sass
Sass
gulp
gulp

What are some alternatives to Material Design for Angular, Toolkit?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase