Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Material Design vs Material Design Lite: What are the differences?
Purpose: Material Design is a comprehensive design system that covers various platforms such as Android, iOS, and the web, providing a cohesive visual language for all. On the other hand, Material Design Lite is primarily focused on the web, offering web developers a set of guidelines and components to create websites with a Material Design look and feel.
Components: Material Design includes a wide range of components, animations, and transitions to be used across different platforms, offering a rich user experience. In contrast, Material Design Lite features a smaller set of components tailored specifically for web development, providing a more lightweight option compared to the full Material Design system.
Integration: Material Design can be seamlessly integrated into Android and iOS apps as well as web applications, ensuring a consistent design language across platforms. Material Design Lite, however, is specifically designed for web developers and integrates easily with existing websites, allowing for the quick adoption of Material Design principles on the web.
Customization: While Material Design offers a comprehensive set of guidelines and components that can be customized to fit specific needs, Material Design Lite provides a more limited range of customization options, focusing on simplicity and ease of use for web developers.
Performance: Material Design Lite is optimized for performance on the web, offering a lightweight framework that helps in reducing page load times and improving overall website performance. In contrast, Material Design, with its broader scope and more extensive set of features, may require more resources and have a potentially higher impact on performance.
Community Support: Material Design has a larger community and ecosystem, with more resources, documentation, and support available for developers looking to implement the design system across different platforms. Material Design Lite, being a more specific tool for web development, has a smaller but dedicated community focused on web design and development.
In Summary, Material Design and Material Design Lite differ in their scope, components, integration, customization options, performance, and community support, catering to different needs in design and development.
I am a bit confused when to choose Bootstrap vs Material Design or Tailwind CSS, and why? I mean, in which kind of projects we can work with bootstrap/Material/Tailwind CSS? If the design is made up on the grid, we prefer bootstrap, and if flat design, then material design. Similarly, when do we choose tailwind CSS?
Any suggestion would be appreciated?
I don't know about material design.
You would go with Bootstrap if you want to prototype / build something without bothering about the design at all and you are OK if everything looks kinda template-y, using bootstrap out of the box components.
Go with Tailwind if you need a sleek design, a user interface where building with components will be important (because tailwind strongly favors component-based UI), and you know you will need to extend the built-in classes with your own (because tailwind is very easy to extend)
I would personally recommend tailwind over bootstrap any day of the week.
Hi Ashish,
If you need minimal work to be done from your end and like most of the components / design available out of the box - go with Bootstrap. This is the oldest and has the widest adoption and a whole range of components built out by others.
If you like Material design, this is a good choice too. Please note that Bootstrap also has a Material theme, though it is not as native.
Both of these above frameworks are bulky and has more than what you may need.
If you like to build micro-components in a elegant way, TailwindCSS is the way to go.
Tailwind is great you don't have to mess with naming things and it is so much more flexible than the cookie cutter bootstrap, but I don't know about material UI. I recommend tailwind it's super simple to learn and has great code snippets.
Put simply, you should use Tailwind regardless. It is a great addition to whatever you use because it removes the hassle of writing CSS.
Ant Design offers the most components with JS and CSS taken care of. They look clean, professional, and usable.
We paired this with Bulma for making the containers and structure reactive. Bulma (for react) make it easy to just add a section, container, and content and have it work on all platforms.
We also use Geist UI, though not recognized by Stack share, for its simple and modern feel. Highly recommend Geist if you want modern components for complicated UI's
Pros of Material Design
- They really set a new bar in design5
- An intuitive design4
- Simply, And Beautiful3
- Many great libraries2
- Composants0
Pros of Material Design Lite
- Material Design straight from the original creators23
- Based on bem philosophy11
- Nice animations9
- SCSS7
- Simple Material Design5
- Doesn't depend on JavaScript5
- Custom color palette generates CDN2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Material Design
- Sometimes, it can hang the browser2
