Material Design vs PrimeNg

Overview

Material Design

Stacks594

Followers890

Votes14

PrimeNg

Stacks229

Followers286

Votes15

GitHub Stars12.1K

Forks5.0K

Material Design vs PrimeNg: What are the differences?

Introduction

Material Design and PrimeNG are both popular design systems used in website and application development. Although they share some similarities, they also have key differences that set them apart. In this Markdown code, we will highlight the six main differences between Material Design and PrimeNG.

Styling Options: Material Design provides a wide range of pre-designed components and styles that can be easily implemented with minimal customization. On the other hand, PrimeNG offers a larger variety of customizable components and styling options, allowing developers to have more control over the appearance of their application.
Component Availability: Material Design offers a comprehensive set of components, including buttons, cards, and navigation bars, making it suitable for building various types of interfaces. PrimeNG, on the other hand, provides an extensive collection of over 80 UI components, including advanced features like data tables and drag-and-drop functionality, which makes it ideal for creating complex business applications.
Flexibility vs. Consistency: Material Design emphasizes consistency in design guidelines to ensure a cohesive user experience across different platforms and devices. PrimeNG, however, offers more flexibility and allows for greater customization, enabling developers to tailor the design and functionality to their specific needs.
Mobile-First Approach: Material Design follows a mobile-first approach, focusing on delivering optimal user experiences on mobile devices. PrimeNG also supports mobile responsiveness, but it is not as deeply rooted in mobile-first principles as Material Design.
Community and Support: Both Material Design and PrimeNG have active communities and reliable support channels. However, Material Design, developed by Google, benefits from the vast resources and contributions of the Google developer community, making it more widely recognized and supported.
Integration and Compatibility: Material Design aligns closely with other Google products and services, making it easier to integrate with existing Google platforms like Android and Firebase. PrimeNG, on the other hand, is compatible with a broader range of platforms and frameworks, including Angular, React, and Vue, offering more flexibility in choosing the development environment.

In Summary, while Material Design focuses on consistency and simplicity with a mobile-first approach, PrimeNG offers more customization options, a broader range of components, and compatibility with multiple platforms and frameworks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Material Design	PrimeNg
Material Design is a unified system that combines theory, resources, and tools for crafting digital experiences.	It has a rich collection of components that would satisfy most of the UI requirements of your application like datatable, dropdown, multiselect, notification messages, accordion, breadcrumbs and other input components. So there would be no need of adding different libraries for different UI requirements.
-	Single library for all components; supports templating; Active development; offers a list of themes for UI components
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 12.1K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 5.0K
Stacks 594	Stacks 229
Followers 890	Followers 286
Votes 14	Votes 15
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 They really set a new bar in design 4 An intuitive design 3 Simply, And Beautiful 2 Many great libraries 0 Composants Cons 2 Sometimes, it can hang the browser	Pros 6 Complete 4 Wide range of components 3 Easy to use 1 Already 17+ version up 1 Modern UI components that work across the web Cons 4 Components are hard to customize 3 Easy to use 3 Need to buy themes 2 Hard to understand 2 Functionality differs for all components
Integrations
No integrations available	Angular Angular CLI

What are some alternatives to Material Design, PrimeNg?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Material Design vs PrimeNg: What are the differences?

Introduction

Styling Options: Material Design provides a wide range of pre-designed components and styles that can be easily implemented with minimal customization. On the other hand, PrimeNG offers a larger variety of customizable components and styling options, allowing developers to have more control over the appearance of their application.
Component Availability: Material Design offers a comprehensive set of components, including buttons, cards, and navigation bars, making it suitable for building various types of interfaces. PrimeNG, on the other hand, provides an extensive collection of over 80 UI components, including advanced features like data tables and drag-and-drop functionality, which makes it ideal for creating complex business applications.
Flexibility vs. Consistency: Material Design emphasizes consistency in design guidelines to ensure a cohesive user experience across different platforms and devices. PrimeNG, however, offers more flexibility and allows for greater customization, enabling developers to tailor the design and functionality to their specific needs.
Mobile-First Approach: Material Design follows a mobile-first approach, focusing on delivering optimal user experiences on mobile devices. PrimeNG also supports mobile responsiveness, but it is not as deeply rooted in mobile-first principles as Material Design.
Community and Support: Both Material Design and PrimeNG have active communities and reliable support channels. However, Material Design, developed by Google, benefits from the vast resources and contributions of the Google developer community, making it more widely recognized and supported.
Integration and Compatibility: Material Design aligns closely with other Google products and services, making it easier to integrate with existing Google platforms like Android and Firebase. PrimeNG, on the other hand, is compatible with a broader range of platforms and frameworks, including Angular, React, and Vue, offering more flexibility in choosing the development environment.

Material Design vs PrimeNg

Overview