Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Material Design

597
888
+ 1
14
Semantic UI

954
1.5K
+ 1
673
Add tool

Material Design vs Semantic UI: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Material Design and Semantic UI are two popular front-end frameworks used in web development. While both frameworks aim to make designing beautiful and functional websites easier, they have key differences that designers and developers should consider before choosing one over the other.

1. **Design Philosophy**: Material Design follows Google's design principles, focusing on simplicity, clean typography, and vibrant colors. Semantic UI, on the other hand, emphasizes readability and ease of use, with a more compact design aesthetic that prioritizes information hierarchy.

2. **Component Library**: Material Design offers a comprehensive library of pre-built components, including buttons, cards, and navigation bars, designed to work seamlessly together. Semantic UI also provides a wide range of components, but they are more customizable and modular, allowing developers to mix and match elements more freely.

3. **Customization Options**: While Material Design has a distinct visual style that may be difficult to deviate from, Semantic UI offers more flexibility in terms of customization. Developers can easily modify the look and feel of Semantic UI components to better fit the brand or aesthetic of a particular website.

4. **Community Support**: Material Design benefits from the vast resources and community support of Google, making it easier for developers to find tutorials, plugins, and solutions to common problems. Semantic UI also has a strong community, but it may not be as extensive as that of Material Design.

5. **Documentation**: Material Design provides extensive documentation and guidelines on how to use its components effectively, ensuring a consistent user experience across different platforms. Semantic UI documentation is also robust, but it may require more exploration to fully understand the framework and its capabilities.

6. **Browser Compatibility**: Material Design is optimized for Google Chrome and may not display as intended on other browsers. Semantic UI, on the other hand, aims for cross-browser compatibility, ensuring a consistent user experience across different platforms and devices.

In Summary, Material Design and Semantic UI offer distinct design philosophies, component libraries, customization options, community support levels, documentation quality, and browser compatibility, making them suitable for different project requirements and design preferences.
Advice on Material Design and Semantic UI
Ashish Sharma
Sr. UI Associate at Daffodil Software · | 5 upvotes · 728K views

I am a bit confused when to choose Bootstrap vs Material Design or Tailwind CSS, and why? I mean, in which kind of projects we can work with bootstrap/Material/Tailwind CSS? If the design is made up on the grid, we prefer bootstrap, and if flat design, then material design. Similarly, when do we choose tailwind CSS?

Any suggestion would be appreciated?

See more
Replies (4)

I don't know about material design.

You would go with Bootstrap if you want to prototype / build something without bothering about the design at all and you are OK if everything looks kinda template-y, using bootstrap out of the box components.

Go with Tailwind if you need a sleek design, a user interface where building with components will be important (because tailwind strongly favors component-based UI), and you know you will need to extend the built-in classes with your own (because tailwind is very easy to extend)

I would personally recommend tailwind over bootstrap any day of the week.

See more

Hi Ashish,

If you need minimal work to be done from your end and like most of the components / design available out of the box - go with Bootstrap. This is the oldest and has the widest adoption and a whole range of components built out by others.

If you like Material design, this is a good choice too. Please note that Bootstrap also has a Material theme, though it is not as native.

Both of these above frameworks are bulky and has more than what you may need.

If you like to build micro-components in a elegant way, TailwindCSS is the way to go.

See more
Recommends
on
Tailwind CSSTailwind CSS

Tailwind is great you don't have to mess with naming things and it is so much more flexible than the cookie cutter bootstrap, but I don't know about material UI. I recommend tailwind it's super simple to learn and has great code snippets.

See more
Recommends
on
Tailwind CSSTailwind CSS

Put simply, you should use Tailwind regardless. It is a great addition to whatever you use because it removes the hassle of writing CSS.

See more
Decisions about Material Design and Semantic UI
Ryan Wans

Ant Design offers the most components with JS and CSS taken care of. They look clean, professional, and usable.

We paired this with Bulma for making the containers and structure reactive. Bulma (for react) make it easy to just add a section, container, and content and have it work on all platforms.

We also use Geist UI, though not recognized by Stack share, for its simple and modern feel. Highly recommend Geist if you want modern components for complicated UI's

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Material Design
Pros of Semantic UI
  • 5
    They really set a new bar in design
  • 4
    An intuitive design
  • 3
    Simply, And Beautiful
  • 2
    Many great libraries
  • 0
    Composants
  • 157
    Easy to use and looks elegant
  • 92
    Variety of components
  • 64
    Themes
  • 61
    Has out-of-the-box widgets i would actually use
  • 57
    Semantic, duh
  • 44
    Its the future
  • 42
    Open source
  • 37
    Very active development
  • 31
    Far less complicated structure
  • 28
    Gulp
  • 9
    Already has more features than bootstrap
  • 8
    Just compare it to Bootstrap and you'll be hooked
  • 7
    Clean and consistent markup model
  • 7
    UI components
  • 6
    Responsiveness
  • 4
    Because it is semantic :-D
  • 4
    Elegant. clean. readable. maintainable
  • 4
    Good-Looking
  • 2
    Is big and look really great, nothing like this
  • 2
    Consistent
  • 2
    Great docs
  • 2
    Modular and scalable
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Blends with reactjs
  • 1
    Jquery

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Material Design
Cons of Semantic UI
  • 2
    Sometimes, it can hang the browser
  • 5
    Outdated build tool (gulp 3))
  • 3
    Poor accessibility support
  • 3
    HTML is not semantic (see list component)
  • 2
    Javascript is tied to jquery

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What companies use Material Design?
What companies use Semantic UI?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Material Design?
What tools integrate with Semantic UI?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Material Design and Semantic UI?
Bootstrap
Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.
Material Design Lite
Material Design Lite (MDL) lets you add a Material Design look and feel to your static content websites. It doesn't rely on any JavaScript frameworks or libraries. Optimized for cross-device use, gracefully degrades in older browsers, and offers an experience that is accessible from the get-go.
Flat UI
Flat UI is a beautiful theme for Bootstrap. We have redesigned many of its components to look flat in every pixel.
Ant Design
An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.
Material
Express your creativity with Material, an animation and graphics framework for Google's Material Design and Apple's Flat UI in Swift.
See all alternatives