Material-UI聽vs聽NativeScript

Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Material-UI
Material-UI

556
510
+ 1
156
NativeScript
NativeScript

299
424
+ 1
410
Add tool

Material-UI vs NativeScript: What are the differences?

Developers describe Material-UI as "React components for faster and easier web development. Build your own design system, or start with Material Design". React components for faster and easier web development. Build your own design system, or start with Material Design. On the other hand, NativeScript is detailed as "Build truly native apps with JavaScript". NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Material-UI and NativeScript are primarily classified as "Front-End Frameworks" and "Cross-Platform Mobile Development" tools respectively.

"React" is the top reason why over 51 developers like Material-UI, while over 55 developers mention "Access to the entire native api" as the leading cause for choosing NativeScript.

Material-UI and NativeScript are both open source tools. It seems that Material-UI with 48.1K GitHub stars and 10.7K forks on GitHub has more adoption than NativeScript with 17.1K GitHub stars and 1.26K GitHub forks.

DeveloperTown, Ratio, and Code Foundries are some of the popular companies that use Material-UI, whereas NativeScript is used by Work Box, Zege Technologies, and GeekyAnts. Material-UI has a broader approval, being mentioned in 67 company stacks & 77 developers stacks; compared to NativeScript, which is listed in 10 company stacks and 23 developer stacks.

What is Material-UI?

It is a comprehensive guide for visual, motion, and interaction design across platforms and devices.

What is NativeScript?

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Material-UI?
Why do developers choose NativeScript?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    Be the first to leave a con
    What companies use Material-UI?
    What companies use NativeScript?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Material-UI?
    What tools integrate with NativeScript?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Material-UI and NativeScript?
    Kendo UI
    Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.
    Flat UI
    Flat UI is a beautiful theme for Bootstrap. We have redesigned many of its components to look flat in every pixel.
    Ant Design
    An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.
    react-md
    React MD is Google's Material Design specifications implemented with Sass and React. The goal of the project is to create components that adhere to the Material Design specifications.
    Angular Material
    Sprint from Zero to App. Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. It allows to create material styled angular apps fast and easy.
    See all alternatives
    Decisions about Material-UI and NativeScript
    leonardo silveira
    leonardo silveira
    Software Engineer at Casa Magalh茫es | 2 upvotes 31.7K views
    Vue.js
    Vue.js
    Apache Cordova
    Apache Cordova
    NativeScript
    NativeScript

    So, i am preparing to adopt NativeScript.

    For years my hybrid projects used Apache Cordova.

    "Let's avoid to maintain two teams and double the deliver velocity".

    It was good for a few years, we had those september issues, (i.e. apple broke some backward compatibility) , but for the last years, things seems to be losing the grip faster.

    Last breaking changes, for instance, seems to have a workaround, however that growing feeling that simple things can not rely on so fragile webviews keeps growing faster and faster.

    I've tested nativescript not only on it's "helloworld", but also on how do they respond on issues.

    I got tweed support. I opened an github issue and got answers on less than 10 hours (yes i did it on another timezone and very close to a weekend). I saw the faulty docs get corrected in two days.

    The bad news is i only can adopt nativescript on newer projects, since there is no budget to revamp the current solutions.

    The good news is i can keep coding on Vue.js , without vou router, but that's ok. I've already exchanged vanilla html for real native app with background magic enabled, the router can be easily reproduced.

    See more
    Adebayo Akinlaja
    Adebayo Akinlaja
    Engineering Manager at Andela | 13 upvotes 18.4K views
    Bit
    Bit
    Create React App
    Create React App
    Material Kit
    Material Kit
    TypeScript
    TypeScript
    Evergreen
    Evergreen
    Material-UI
    Material-UI
    React
    React

    I picked up an idea to develop and it was no brainer I had to go with React for the frontend. I was faced with challenges when it came to what component framework to use. I had worked extensively with Material-UI but I needed something different that would offer me wider range of well customized components (I became pretty slow at styling). I brought in Evergreen after several sampling and reads online but again, after several prototype development against Evergreen鈥攕ince I was using TypeScript and I had to import custom Type, it felt exhaustive. After I validated Evergreen with the designs of the idea I was developing, I also noticed I might have to do a lot of styling. I later stumbled on Material Kit, the one specifically made for React . It was promising with beautifully crafted components, most of which fits into the designs pages I had on ground.

    A major problem of Material Kit for me is it isn't written in TypeScript and there isn't any plans to support its TypeScript version. I rolled up my sleeve and started converting their components to TypeScript and if you'll ask me, I am still on it.

    In summary, I used the Create React App with TypeScript support and I am spending some time converting Material Kit to TypeScript before I start developing against it. All of these components are going to be hosted on Bit.

    If you feel I am crazy or I have gotten something wrong, I'll be willing to listen to your opinion. Also, if you want to have a share of whatever TypeScript version of Material Kit I end up coming up with, let me know.

    See more
    Interest over time
    Reviews of Material-UI and NativeScript
    Review ofNativeScriptNativeScript

    It is using the native components to build the UI and offers the best skills reuse story. All you need to know is JS/TS and CSS. Angular 2 is also supported which leads to even more code reuse across web and mobile.This is also the best way to access the native platform APIs directly.

    Review ofNativeScriptNativeScript

    NativeScript allows you to reuse your JS skills to build Native mobile apps without any sacrifices. It takes a bit to learn about all possible features, but each time you discover a new one you can't help but get more and more excited.

    How developers use Material-UI and NativeScript
    Avatar of Cloudcraft
    Cloudcraft uses Material-UIMaterial-UI

    Material UI provides Cloudcraft.co with a clean, professional looking and very easy to use set of UI components build with React. The few issues we've reported to the developers have been quickly fixed each time. I highly recommend using Material UI for both consumer and enterprise web apps. The styling system in particular is very nice to work with, and allows you to easily add your own brand's look and feel throughout the UI.

    Avatar of Kurzor, s.r.o.
    Kurzor, s.r.o. uses Material-UIMaterial-UI

    We like the pure simplicity of Google's Material UI. It is simply too much overhead today to design custom UI styles.

    Avatar of DerEnderKeks
    DerEnderKeks uses Material-UIMaterial-UI

    Martial UI is used by Admin-on-REST, the frontend used by Gofus.

    Avatar of Ambar
    Ambar uses Material-UIMaterial-UI

    Ambar UI is based on Material UI components

    Avatar of Sunny Singh
    Sunny Singh uses Material-UIMaterial-UI

    Provides Material-based components.

    How much does Material-UI cost?
    How much does NativeScript cost?
    Pricing unavailable
    Pricing unavailable
    News about Material-UI
    More news