StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material-UI vs react-md

Material-UI vs react-md

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material-UI
Material-UI
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.7K
Votes445
react-md
react-md
Stacks28
Followers44
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.3K
Forks299

Material-UI vs react-md: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Material-UI and react-md

Material-UI and react-md are two popular UI component libraries for building user interfaces in React. While both libraries offer similar functionalities, there are some key differences that set them apart.

  1. Component Styles: Material-UI follows Google's Material Design guidelines, providing a set of pre-made and customizable components with a distinct, modern, and clean look. On the other hand, react-md focuses on providing components that closely resemble the Material Design specifications, allowing for greater flexibility and customization to match the design requirements of a specific project.

  2. Styling Approach: Material-UI uses JSS (JavaScript Style Sheets) as its styling solution, which allows for dynamic and props-based styling of components. This makes it easy to create responsive layouts and apply theme changes. In contrast, react-md uses SASS (Syntactically Awesome Style Sheets) for styling. SASS offers a more traditional approach to styling, making it familiar to developers already comfortable with CSS preprocessing.

  3. Component Ecosystem: Material-UI provides a wider range of ready-to-use components, including complex components like data grids, tables, and timelines, which can save development time. React-md, on the other hand, focuses on providing a more basic set of components, without as many complex or specialized components included out-of-the-box. This allows for a smaller bundle size and greater flexibility to add custom components specific to the project's requirements.

  4. Community and Support: Material-UI has a larger and more active community, which means there is extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available. It is also frequently updated and maintained by a dedicated team. React-md, while also having an active community, is relatively smaller compared to Material-UI. This means that there might be fewer third-party resources and less frequent updates, although the library is still well-maintained.

  5. Documentation and Learning Curve: Material-UI has comprehensive documentation with detailed examples, making it easier for developers to get started and find solutions to common problems. React-md's documentation is also thorough but may require more effort to navigate if you are new to the library. The learning curve for Material-UI is generally considered to be easier due to its popularity and extensive resources available.

  6. Integration with Other Libraries: Material-UI integrates well with additional packages like Material-UI icons and Formik, which further enhances its capabilities. It also has official support for integration with popular state management libraries like Redux. React-md, while it does support integration with other libraries, may require more manual configuration and may not have as many official integrations available.

In summary, Material-UI offers a more opinionated and comprehensive set of components with a modern appearance, while react-md provides a closer adherence to Material Design guidelines and allows for greater customization. Choose Material-UI for its extensive component ecosystem and easier learning curve, or react-md for more fine-grained control over the appearance and behavior of components.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Material-UI, react-md

Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

766k views766k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI
Material-UI
react-md
react-md

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

React MD is Google's Material Design specifications implemented with Sass and React. The goal of the project is to create components that adhere to the Material Design specifications.

Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming
Accessibility focused;Uses Sass for opt-in mixins and configurable variables for styling;Follows the Material Design specifications
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
2.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
299
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
28
Followers
3.7K
Followers
44
Votes
445
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 141
    React
  • 82
    Material Design
  • 60
    Ui components
  • 30
    CSS framework
  • 26
    Component
Cons
  • 36
    Hard to learn. Bad documentation
  • 29
    Hard to customize
  • 22
    Hard to understand Docs
  • 9
    Bad performance
  • 7
    For editable table component need to use material-table
No community feedback yet
Integrations
React
React
Emotion
Emotion
Next.js
Next.js
styled-components
styled-components
Node.js
Node.js
React
React
Material Design
Material Design

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, react-md?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase