Materialize vs Semantic UI

Overview

Semantic UI

Stacks992

Followers1.5K

Votes673

GitHub Stars51.2K

Forks4.9K

Materialize

Stacks698

Followers1.2K

Votes557

GitHub Stars39.1K

Forks4.7K

Materialize vs Semantic UI: What are the differences?

Introduction: When it comes to front-end frameworks, Materialize and Semantic UI are popular choices among web developers. Both frameworks offer a variety of components and styling options to create visually appealing websites. However, there are key differences between Materialize and Semantic UI that developers should be aware of.

Design Philosophy: Materialize follows the Material Design guidelines created by Google, focusing on clean, minimalistic design and user experience. On the other hand, Semantic UI emphasizes human-friendly HTML, making it easier for developers to understand and maintain the code.
Customization Options: Materialize provides more predefined components and styles out of the box, making it quicker to prototype and build websites. In contrast, Semantic UI offers a highly customizable approach, allowing developers to modify and extend components easily to fit their design needs.
Community Support: Materialize has a larger user base and more extensive documentation, making it easier to find solutions to common problems and get support from the community. Semantic UI, although less popular, has a dedicated community that focuses on maintaining the framework and providing continuous updates.
JavaScript Integration: Materialize comes with a set of built-in JavaScript components for interactive elements like modals, sliders, and tooltips. Semantic UI, on the other hand, relies more on jQuery and custom JavaScript for advanced interactions, providing flexibility but requiring more code for complex functionality.
Grid System: Materialize uses a 12-column grid system with classes for responsive layouts, making it simple to create responsive designs. Semantic UI also employs a grid system but with a different naming convention and approach, offering more flexibility in designing layouts but requiring a learning curve for beginners.

In Summary, Materialize focuses on Material Design principles with ready-to-use components, while Semantic UI emphasizes customization, human-friendly HTML, and a flexible grid system for more control over the design.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Semantic UI, Materialize

Kwasi

CTO

Feb 23, 2021

Review

You can choose between Angular Material or PrimeNG, if you have experience in integrating third party javascript libs you can use SemanticUI , Bootstrap or Foundation. All above UI Frameworks support side navigation with off page canavas implementation.

9.26k views9.26k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Semantic UI	Materialize
Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.	A CSS Framework based on material design.
Build Responsive Layouts Easier;Self Explanatory;Tag ambivalent;Powerful tools for expressing groups and collections;Portable and self-contained	Speeds up development;User Experience Focused;Easy to work with
Statistics
GitHub Stars 51.2K	GitHub Stars 39.1K
GitHub Forks 4.9K	GitHub Forks 4.7K
Stacks 992	Stacks 698
Followers 1.5K	Followers 1.2K
Votes 673	Votes 557
Pros & Cons
Pros 157 Easy to use and looks elegant 92 Variety of components 64 Themes 61 Has out-of-the-box widgets i would actually use 57 Semantic, duh Cons 5 Outdated build tool (gulp 3)) 3 HTML is not semantic (see list component) 3 Poor accessibility support 2 Javascript is tied to jquery	Pros 102 Google material design 74 Responsive 74 Easy to use 54 Modern looks 48 Open source Cons 7 Mobile errors 6 Poor Grid System 2 Unmaintained
Integrations
AngularJS React Ember.js Meteor	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Semantic UI, Materialize?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Vuetify

Vuetify is a component framework for Vue.js 2. It aims to provide clean, semantic and reusable components that make building your application a breeze. Vuetify utilizes Google's Material Design design pattern, taking cues from other popular frameworks such as Materialize.css, Material Design Lite, Semantic UI and Bootstrap 4.

Related Comparisons

Materialize vs Semantic UI: What are the differences?

Design Philosophy: Materialize follows the Material Design guidelines created by Google, focusing on clean, minimalistic design and user experience. On the other hand, Semantic UI emphasizes human-friendly HTML, making it easier for developers to understand and maintain the code.
Customization Options: Materialize provides more predefined components and styles out of the box, making it quicker to prototype and build websites. In contrast, Semantic UI offers a highly customizable approach, allowing developers to modify and extend components easily to fit their design needs.
Community Support: Materialize has a larger user base and more extensive documentation, making it easier to find solutions to common problems and get support from the community. Semantic UI, although less popular, has a dedicated community that focuses on maintaining the framework and providing continuous updates.
JavaScript Integration: Materialize comes with a set of built-in JavaScript components for interactive elements like modals, sliders, and tooltips. Semantic UI, on the other hand, relies more on jQuery and custom JavaScript for advanced interactions, providing flexibility but requiring more code for complex functionality.
Grid System: Materialize uses a 12-column grid system with classes for responsive layouts, making it simple to create responsive designs. Semantic UI also employs a grid system but with a different naming convention and approach, offering more flexibility in designing layouts but requiring a learning curve for beginners.

Materialize vs Semantic UI

Overview