Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Materialize vs Skeleton: What are the differences?
Materialize vs. Skeleton
Materialize and Skeleton are both popular front-end frameworks used to create responsive websites. While they share some similarities, they also have key differences that set them apart.
File Size: Materialize has a larger file size compared to Skeleton. This means that Skeleton is more lightweight and can lead to faster load times for websites utilizing it.
Grid System: Materialize uses a 12-column grid system, similar to Bootstrap, which provides more flexibility in designing responsive layouts. On the other hand, Skeleton uses a simpler 12-column grid system, making it easier for beginners to understand and work with.
Components: Materialize offers a wide range of pre-designed components such as buttons, navigation bars, and cards, making it easier to build complex layouts. In contrast, Skeleton focuses more on providing a basic set of styles for typography and forms, requiring more customization for additional components.
Customization: Materialize provides extensive customization options, allowing developers to modify the design to fit their brand aesthetic. Skeleton, on the other hand, offers a more minimalist approach, catering to developers who prefer a clean and simple design.
Browser Support: Materialize has better browser support compared to Skeleton, ensuring a consistent user experience across different browsers and devices. This can be crucial for websites targeting a wide audience.
Community Support: Materialize has a larger and more active community compared to Skeleton, resulting in more resources, tutorials, and plugins available for developers. This can be beneficial for troubleshooting and expanding functionality in projects.
In Summary, Materialize and Skeleton differ in file size, grid system complexity, components, customization options, browser support, and community size.
Pros of Materialize
- Google material design102
- Easy to use74
- Responsive74
- Modern looks54
- Open source48
- Good documentation42
- Code examples37
- Extremely light - 29kb29
- Flexible28
- Great Support15
- It looks beautiful10
- Very nice looking components to quickly build out8
- Smooth animation7
- Great Grid System6
- Great4
- Ruby gem to integrate in 2 seconds flat4
- Angular2 Support3
- MIT Lisence2
- Friendly api, easy setup, good documentation2
- Easy setup2
- React1
- Grid system1
- Because of the easy to use and very editable library1
- Responsivness1
- Jibberish1
- Friendly Api1
- Better class name0
- Rtl support0
Pros of Skeleton
- Minimalist9
- Responsive6
- Simple4
- Fantastically straight forward2
- Lightweight, clean syntax1
- More than an Alternative1
- Lightweight1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Materialize
- Mobile errors7
- Poor Grid System6
- Unmaintained2
Cons of Skeleton
- Have to make design decisions0