Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
GitHub Pages vs Medium: What are the differences?
Introduction: Here is a comparison between GitHub Pages and Medium, focusing on their key differences.
Customization Options: GitHub Pages provides users with extensive customization options, allowing them to create a personalized website using their own code, templates, and themes. On the other hand, Medium offers limited customization options, primarily based on pre-designed templates with limited flexibility.
Audience Reach: GitHub Pages mainly targets developers and tech-savvy users, providing a platform to showcase their coding projects, documentation, and technical blogs. In contrast, Medium appeals to a broader audience, including writers, journalists, and bloggers, allowing them to share their thoughts, articles, and stories with a larger community.
Integration with Git: GitHub Pages seamlessly integrates with Git repositories, enabling users to automatically publish their website updates by pushing changes to their designated repository. Medium, on the other hand, does not have integration with Git, requiring users to manually update and publish their content on the platform.
Collaboration and Version Control: GitHub Pages offers robust collaboration features, facilitating team collaboration, version control, and issue tracking through Git. Medium, however, does not provide such collaboration features, making it less suitable for collaborative writing projects or managing multiple contributors.
Monetization Options: Medium provides a monetization model, allowing writers to earn revenue through the Medium Partner Program based on the engagement and readership of their articles. GitHub Pages, being primarily a hosting platform, does not offer built-in monetization options for website owners.
Platform Lock-in: With GitHub Pages, users have the freedom to migrate their website to another hosting platform if desired, as the code and content can be easily transferred. On the other hand, Medium operates as a proprietary platform, meaning users may face difficulties or constraints if they decide to move their content to another platform in the future.
In Summary, GitHub Pages offers extensive customization options, appeals to developers, integrates with Git, facilitates collaboration, lacks built-in monetization, and allows easy migration, while Medium has limited customization, broader audience reach, lacks Git integration, lacks collaboration features, offers monetization options, and may pose platform lock-in challenges.
We use Netlify to host static websites.
The reasons for choosing Netlify over GitHub Pages are as follows:
- Netfily can bind multiple domain names, while GitHub Pages can only bind one domain name
- With Netfily, the original repository can be private, while GitHub Pages free tier requires the original repository to be public
In addition, in order to use CDN, we use Netlify DNS.
Pros of GitHub Pages
- Free290
- Right out of github217
- Quick to set up185
- Instant108
- Easy to learn107
- Great way of setting up your project's website58
- Widely used47
- Quick and easy41
- Great documentation37
- Super easy4
- Easy setup3
- Instant and fast Jekyll builds2
- Great customer support2
- Great integration2
Pros of Medium
- Beautiful UI61
- Typography34
- Network effect15
- Embedding videos, tweets, vines12
- Great mobile app12
- Simple, yet elegant and appealing UX11
- Notes10
- Word counter9
- Easy to gain traction7
- Idealized media consumption4
- Inline Comments & Discussions3
- Beautiful design. great content, excellent experience3
- Version history2
- Nice UI and UX2
- Embed medium2
- Recommendations2
- Daily Digest1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of GitHub Pages
- Not possible to perform HTTP redirects4
- Supports only Jekyll3
- Limited Jekyll plugins3
- Jekyll is bloated1