Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

JSON

1.9K
1.6K
+ 1
9
MessagePack

24
79
+ 1
1
Add tool

JSON vs MessagePack: What are the differences?

Introduction

JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) and MessagePack are both data interchange formats that are used to serialize and deserialize data. They provide a standardized way of representing data structures in a platform-independent way. While both formats serve the same purpose, there are several key differences between them.

  1. Serialization Format: JSON is a text-based format, whereas MessagePack is binary-based. JSON uses human-readable text to represent data, which makes it easier for humans to read and write. On the other hand, MessagePack uses binary encoding, which results in more compact data representation and faster serialization and deserialization.

  2. Data Compactness: MessagePack is more compact than JSON, which means that it requires less storage space and results in smaller network payloads. MessagePack achieves this compactness by using binary encoding and omitting unnecessary information, such as field names, which are implied by the data structure.

  3. Data Type Support: JSON supports a limited set of data types, including strings, numbers, booleans, arrays, and objects. MessagePack, on the other hand, supports a wider range of data types, such as integers of different sizes, floating-point numbers, booleans, strings, arrays, maps, and binary data. This increased data type support allows MessagePack to represent complex data structures more accurately.

  4. Language Support: JSON is widely supported in programming languages and has native support in JavaScript. It is also supported in other languages through libraries or APIs. MessagePack also provides support for various programming languages, but the range of libraries and APIs available may be more limited compared to JSON.

  5. Error Handling: JSON includes built-in support for error handling, with well-defined error messages and a clear structure for representing error information. MessagePack, on the other hand, does not have built-in error handling mechanisms. It is up to the application to define how errors are handled when using MessagePack.

  6. Compatibility: JSON is widely used and supported by web browsers, making it an ideal choice for web-based applications. MessagePack, while not as widely supported as JSON, offers better performance in terms of serialization and deserialization speed and data compactness. Applications that require high performance and low data size may choose to use MessagePack over JSON.

In summary, JSON and MessagePack are both data interchange formats, but they differ in terms of serialization format, data compactness, data type support, language support, error handling, and compatibility. MessagePack offers more compact data representation, greater data type support, and better performance, but it may have limited language support compared to JSON.

Advice on JSON and MessagePack
Needs advice
on
JSONJSON
and
PythonPython

Hi. Currently, I have a requirement where I have to create a new JSON file based on the input CSV file, validate the generated JSON file, and upload the JSON file into the application (which runs in AWS) using API. Kindly suggest the best language that can meet the above requirement. I feel Python will be better, but I am not sure with the justification of why python. Can you provide your views on this?

See more
Replies (3)
Recommends
on
PythonPython

Python is very flexible and definitely up the job (although, in reality, any language will be able to cope with this task!). Python has some good libraries built in, and also some third party libraries that will help here. 1. Convert CSV -> JSON 2. Validate against a schema 3. Deploy to AWS

  1. The builtins include json and csv libraries, and, depending on the complexity of the csv file, it is fairly simple to convert:
import csv
import json

with open("your_input.csv", "r") as f:
    csv_as_dict = list(csv.DictReader(f))[0]

with open("your_output.json", "w") as f:
    json.dump(csv_as_dict, f)
  1. The validation part is handled nicely by this library: https://pypi.org/project/jsonschema/ It allows you to create a schema and check whether what you have created works for what you want to do. It is based on the json schema standard, allowing annotation and validation of any json

  2. It as an AWS library to automate the upload - or in fact do pretty much anything with AWS - from within your codebase: https://aws.amazon.com/sdk-for-python/ This will handle authentication to AWS and uploading / deploying the file to wherever it needs to go.

A lot depends on the last two pieces, but the converting itself is really pretty neat.

See more
Recommends
on
GolangGolang

I would use Go. Since CSV files are flat (no hierarchy), you could use the encoding/csv package to read each row, and write out the values as JSON. See https://medium.com/@ankurraina/reading-a-simple-csv-in-go-36d7a269cecd. You just have to figure out in advance what the key is for each row.

See more
Max Musing
Founder & CEO at BaseDash · | 1 upvotes · 312.7K views
Recommends
on
Node.jsNode.js
at

This should be pretty doable in any language. Go with whatever you're most familiar with.

That being said, there's a case to be made for using Node.js since it's trivial to convert an object to JSON and vice versa.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of JSON
Pros of MessagePack
  • 5
    Simple
  • 4
    Widely supported
  • 1
    Lightweight

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is JSON?

JavaScript Object Notation is a lightweight data-interchange format. It is easy for humans to read and write. It is easy for machines to parse and generate. It is based on a subset of the JavaScript Programming Language.

What is MessagePack?

It is an efficient binary serialization format. It lets you exchange data among multiple languages like JSON. But it's faster and smaller. Small integers are encoded into a single byte, and typical short strings require only one extra byte in addition to the strings themselves.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use JSON?
What companies use MessagePack?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with JSON?
What tools integrate with MessagePack?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

Aug 28 2019 at 3:10AM

Segment

PythonJavaAmazon S3+16
7
2630
What are some alternatives to JSON and MessagePack?
YAML
A human-readable data-serialization language. It is commonly used for configuration files, but could be used in many applications where data is being stored or transmitted.
Protobuf
Protocol buffers are Google's language-neutral, platform-neutral, extensible mechanism for serializing structured data – think XML, but smaller, faster, and simpler.
Avro
It is a row-oriented remote procedure call and data serialization framework developed within Apache's Hadoop project. It uses JSON for defining data types and protocols, and serializes data in a compact binary format.
MongoDB
MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
OData
It is an ISO/IEC approved, OASIS standard that defines a set of best practices for building and consuming RESTful APIs. It helps you focus on your business logic while building RESTful APIs without having to worry about the various approaches to define request and response headers, status codes, HTTP methods, URL conventions, media types, payload formats, query options, etc.
See all alternatives