Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

MkDocs

129
151
+ 1
14
Wiki.js

55
142
+ 1
2
Add tool

MkDocs vs Wiki.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this task, we will explore the key differences between MkDocs and Wiki.js, both of which are commonly used tools for creating documentation websites. Markdown code will be used for formatting the differences, making it suitable for integration into a website.

  1. Customization Options: MkDocs provides a range of customizable themes and templates, allowing users to tailor the appearance of their documentation website. On the other hand, Wiki.js offers a more limited set of customization options, focused primarily on branding and layout customization.

  2. Collaboration and Editing: MkDocs supports collaboration by integrating with various version control systems, such as Git, enabling multiple contributors to work on the documentation simultaneously. Wiki.js, on the other hand, offers a more user-friendly editing interface, allowing for real-time collaborative editing among team members without the need for any version control system.

  3. Access Control and Permissions: Wiki.js offers more robust access control and permission management features compared to MkDocs. With Wiki.js, admins can define user roles, restrict access to specific pages, and set fine-grained permissions for editing and viewing content. MkDocs provides basic authentication options but lacks the advanced user management capabilities of Wiki.js.

  4. Search Functionality: MkDocs relies on external search options, such as integrating with tools like Elasticsearch or Algolia, to provide advanced search functionality. On the other hand, Wiki.js offers a built-in search feature that allows users to search for content within the documentation website without relying on external services or configurations.

  5. Plugin Ecosystem: MkDocs has a rich ecosystem of plugins that extend its functionality. These plugins can be used to add features like table of contents, syntax highlighting, and integrations with various tools. In contrast, Wiki.js has a more limited plugin ecosystem, with fewer options for extending the core functionality of the platform.

  6. Content Structure and Organization: MkDocs is primarily focused on organizing content hierarchically using folders and markdown files. It follows a traditional hierarchical structure for content organization. Wiki.js, on the other hand, offers a more flexible content organization system with the ability to link between pages, create categories, and use tags to categorize and search for content.

In summary, MkDocs provides extensive customization options, version control integration, and a rich plugin ecosystem, while Wiki.js excels in user-friendly editing, robust access control, built-in search functionality, and flexible content organization capabilities.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of MkDocs
Pros of Wiki.js
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Gitlab integration
  • 3
    Extensibility
  • 2
    Themes
  • 1
    Fast speed by node.js
  • 1
    Open Source

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of MkDocs
Cons of Wiki.js
  • 1
    Build time increases exponentially as site grows
  • 1
    No tree structure by default

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is MkDocs?

It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

What is Wiki.js?

It is an open source, modern and powerful wiki app based on Node.js, Git, and Markdown. It runs on the flamingly fast Node.js engine and is optimized to conserve CPU resources.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use MkDocs?
What companies use Wiki.js?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with MkDocs?
What tools integrate with Wiki.js?
What are some alternatives to MkDocs and Wiki.js?
Sphinx
It lets you either batch index and search data stored in an SQL database, NoSQL storage, or just files quickly and easily — or index and search data on the fly, working with it pretty much as with a database server.
Gitbook
It is a modern documentation platform where teams can document everything from products, to APIs and internal knowledge-bases. It is a place to think and track ideas for you & your team.
Jekyll
Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.
Docsify
Docsify generates your documentation website on the fly without generating static html files. Instead, it loads and parses your Markdown files and displays them as a website.
Hugo
Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.
See all alternatives