Mojolicious vs PHP-MVC: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Template Engines**: Mojolicious utilizes a built-in template engine called Mojo::Template for rendering views, while PHP-MVC frameworks like Laravel or CodeIgniter use popular template engines like Blade or Twig, allowing for more sophisticated layout and logic separation.
2. **Routing**: Mojolicious provides a powerful routing system with the ability to easily define routes and placeholders, whereas PHP-MVC frameworks typically use routes defined in separate configuration files or via annotations within controller classes.
3. **Asynchronous Programming**: Mojolicious has built-in support for asynchronous programming, making it easy to handle non-blocking I/O operations, while PHP-MVC frameworks lack native support for asynchronous operations and often rely on external libraries or extensions.
4. **ORM Integration**: PHP-MVC frameworks often come with built-in Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) libraries like Eloquent for Laravel or Doctrine for Symfony, providing a more standardized way to interact with databases, whereas Mojolicious relies on third-party modules like DBIx::Class for ORM functionality.
5. **Error Handling**: Mojolicious has a robust error handling system that allows for custom error pages and detailed error reporting, while PHP-MVC frameworks may not offer as detailed error messages out of the box and require additional configuration for custom error handling.
6. **Community and Ecosystem**: The PHP community is much larger and more established compared to the Mojolicious community, resulting in a wider range of resources, plugins, and libraries available for PHP-MVC frameworks, while Mojolicious may have a more limited ecosystem in terms of community support and third-party integrations.

In Summary, Mojolicious and PHP-MVC differ significantly in their template engines, routing systems, support for asynchronous programming, ORM integration, error handling capabilities, and community ecosystems.