StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Odm
  5. Mongoid vs Mongoose

Mongoid vs Mongoose

OverviewComparison

Overview

Mongoose
Mongoose
Stacks2.4K
Followers1.4K
Votes56
Mongoid
Mongoid
Stacks114
Followers72
Votes4
GitHub Stars25
Forks22

Mongoid vs Mongoose: What are the differences?

Mongoid: Ruby ODM framework for MongoDB. The philosophy of Mongoid is to provide a familiar API to Ruby developers who have been using Active Record or Data Mapper, while leveraging the power of MongoDB's schemaless and performant document-based design, dynamic queries, and atomic modifier operations; Mongoose: MongoDB object modeling designed to work in an asynchronous environment. Let's face it, writing MongoDB validation, casting and business logic boilerplate is a drag. That's why we wrote Mongoose. Mongoose provides a straight-forward, schema-based solution to modeling your application data and includes built-in type casting, validation, query building, business logic hooks and more, out of the box.

Mongoid and Mongoose can be primarily classified as "Object Document Mapper (ODM)" tools.

Mongoid and Mongoose are both open source tools. Mongoose with 18.8K GitHub stars and 2.62K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Mongoid with 21 GitHub stars and 14 GitHub forks.

According to the StackShare community, Mongoose has a broader approval, being mentioned in 85 company stacks & 88 developers stacks; compared to Mongoid, which is listed in 7 company stacks and 7 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mongoose
Mongoose
Mongoid
Mongoid

Let's face it, writing MongoDB validation, casting and business logic boilerplate is a drag. That's why we wrote Mongoose. Mongoose provides a straight-forward, schema-based solution to modeling your application data and includes built-in type casting, validation, query building, business logic hooks and more, out of the box.

The philosophy of Mongoid is to provide a familiar API to Ruby developers who have been using Active Record or Data Mapper, while leveraging the power of MongoDB's schemaless and performant document-based design, dynamic queries, and atomic modifier operations.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
25
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
22
Stacks
2.4K
Stacks
114
Followers
1.4K
Followers
72
Votes
56
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    Well documented
  • 17
    Several bad ideas mixed together
  • 10
    JSON
  • 8
    Actually terrible documentation
  • 2
    Recommended and used by Valve. See steamworks docs
Cons
  • 3
    Model middleware/hooks are not user friendly
Pros
  • 1
    Easy to add 'created_at' and 'updated_at'' timestamps
  • 1
    Supports Referenced and Embedded Associations
  • 1
    Can be used without Rails
  • 1
    Drop-in-and-forget replacement for activerecord
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
MongoDB
MongoDB
MongoDB
MongoDB

What are some alternatives to Mongoose, Mongoid?

No alternatives found.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase