Mongoose vs. Mongoid
|
|
|||||
Mongoose |
Mongoid |
|||||
Favorites30
|
Favorites0
|
|||||
Hacker News, Reddit, Stack Overflow Stats |
||||||
GitHub Stats |
||||||
Description |
What is Mongoose?Let's face it, writing MongoDB validation, casting and business logic boilerplate is a drag. That's why we wrote Mongoose. Mongoose provides a straight-forward, schema-based solution to modeling your application data and includes built-in type casting, validation, query building, business logic hooks and more, out of the box.
|
What is Mongoid?The philosophy of Mongoid is to provide a familiar API to Ruby developers who have been using Active Record or Data Mapper, while leveraging the power of MongoDB's schemaless and performant document-based design, dynamic queries, and atomic modifier operations.
|
||||
Pros about this tool |
|
|
||||
Cons about this tool |
|
|
||||
Pricing |
||||||
Companies |
75 Companies Using Mongoose
|
7 Companies Using Mongoid
|
||||
Integrations |
Mongoose
Integrations
|
Mongoid
Integrations
|
||||
Latest News |
Mongoose Masters the Art of Texting with Students
August 01, 2017
|
Reviews of Mongoose and Mongoid
vvvvalvalval
Complex, confusing and poorly documented
March 19, 2015 02:22
I inherited a stack where Mongoose is used in the database layer.
It's been several months and it's still the single highest source of daily WT*s in my backend development. The API is full of irregularities and the design is a poor mix of object-orientation and stateful objects with a lot implicit behavior. Mongoose made the choices of taking the worst parts of ORMs and using them in a context where the benefits of ORMs don't apply. The only reason I'm keeping it is its handy .populate() feature. Expect bad surprises!
Ease of Use
Documentation
Reliability
Support
