NativeBase vs React Native Material Design

Overview

NativeBase

Stacks85

Followers273

Votes3

GitHub Stars20.4K

Forks2.4K

React Native Material Design

Stacks30

Followers135

Votes5

NativeBase vs React Native Material Design: What are the differences?

1. Target Audience: NativeBase is targeted towards developers who are already familiar with React Native and want a library that provides ready-made UI components and styles. React Native Material Design, on the other hand, is specifically tailored for developers who want to follow the material design guidelines set by Google in their React Native applications. While NativeBase offers a wide range of pre-designed components, React Native Material Design focuses on providing material design-specific components and styles.
2. Component Customization: NativeBase allows for easy customization of its components by providing various props and style overrides. Developers can easily modify the appearance of components to fit their desired design. React Native Material Design also allows for component customization but follows a stricter design guideline, making it more challenging to deviate from the material design principles. The emphasis on consistency with material design may limit the degree of customization developers can apply to the components.
3. Component Library Size: NativeBase has a larger component library compared to React Native Material Design. It offers a wide range of UI components, ranging from basic elements like buttons and cards to more complex ones like tabs and modals. React Native Material Design, on the other hand, provides a smaller set of components that are specifically designed to meet the material design guidelines. This makes NativeBase a more comprehensive choice for developers who need a variety of components for their applications.
4. Theming Support: Both NativeBase and React Native Material Design support theming, allowing developers to apply custom styles and colors to their components. However, NativeBase provides a more flexible theming system, allowing developers to create and customize themes using variables. React Native Material Design, on the other hand, follows the standard material design theming principles, making it easier to achieve a consistent material design look across different components.
5. Documentation and Learning Curve: NativeBase offers comprehensive documentation and examples, making it easier for developers to get started with the library. The documentation includes detailed explanations of each component, their usage, and examples of code. React Native Material Design also provides documentation but may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are not familiar with the material design principles. It requires understanding the material design guidelines to effectively use the library.
6. Popularity and Community Support: NativeBase has a larger user base and a more active community compared to React Native Material Design. This makes it easier to find solutions to common issues, get support, and access a vast collection of open-source projects built with the library. React Native Material Design, while still popular, may have a smaller community, resulting in fewer resources and community support.

In Summary, NativeBase offers a wider range of components and customization options, with a larger user base and community support, while React Native Material Design focuses specifically on following the material design guidelines, with a stricter design approach and a smaller set of components.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

NativeBase	React Native Material Design
NativeBase is a free and open source framework that enables developers to build high-quality mobile apps using React Native iOS and Android apps with a fusion of ES6. NativeBase builds a layer on top of React Native that provides you with basic set of components for mobile application development. This helps you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms.	An open source project which aims to bring Material Design to Android through React Native by Facebook. The library is made up of many components, which can be found in the sidebar.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 20.4K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.4K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 85	Stacks 30
Followers 273	Followers 135
Votes 3	Votes 5
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Easy setup and use	Pros 4 Unmaintained 1 Android-only
Integrations
React Native	React Native

What are some alternatives to NativeBase, React Native Material Design?

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

Expo

It is a framework and a platform for universal React applications. It is a set of tools and services built around React Native and native platforms that help you develop, build, deploy, and quickly iterate on iOS, Android, and web apps.

Related Comparisons

NativeBase vs React Native Material Design: What are the differences?

1. Target Audience: NativeBase is targeted towards developers who are already familiar with React Native and want a library that provides ready-made UI components and styles. React Native Material Design, on the other hand, is specifically tailored for developers who want to follow the material design guidelines set by Google in their React Native applications. While NativeBase offers a wide range of pre-designed components, React Native Material Design focuses on providing material design-specific components and styles.
2. Component Customization: NativeBase allows for easy customization of its components by providing various props and style overrides. Developers can easily modify the appearance of components to fit their desired design. React Native Material Design also allows for component customization but follows a stricter design guideline, making it more challenging to deviate from the material design principles. The emphasis on consistency with material design may limit the degree of customization developers can apply to the components.
3. Component Library Size: NativeBase has a larger component library compared to React Native Material Design. It offers a wide range of UI components, ranging from basic elements like buttons and cards to more complex ones like tabs and modals. React Native Material Design, on the other hand, provides a smaller set of components that are specifically designed to meet the material design guidelines. This makes NativeBase a more comprehensive choice for developers who need a variety of components for their applications.
4. Theming Support: Both NativeBase and React Native Material Design support theming, allowing developers to apply custom styles and colors to their components. However, NativeBase provides a more flexible theming system, allowing developers to create and customize themes using variables. React Native Material Design, on the other hand, follows the standard material design theming principles, making it easier to achieve a consistent material design look across different components.
5. Documentation and Learning Curve: NativeBase offers comprehensive documentation and examples, making it easier for developers to get started with the library. The documentation includes detailed explanations of each component, their usage, and examples of code. React Native Material Design also provides documentation but may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are not familiar with the material design principles. It requires understanding the material design guidelines to effectively use the library.
6. Popularity and Community Support: NativeBase has a larger user base and a more active community compared to React Native Material Design. This makes it easier to find solutions to common issues, get support, and access a vast collection of open-source projects built with the library. React Native Material Design, while still popular, may have a smaller community, resulting in fewer resources and community support.

NativeBase vs React Native Material Design

Overview