NativeScript vs Quasar Framework: What are the differences?

## Introduction
In this Markdown code snippet, we will outline the key differences between NativeScript and Quasar Framework for website development.

1. **Supported Platforms**: NativeScript allows developers to build cross-platform mobile applications using a single codebase for both iOS and Android platforms, while Quasar Framework is primarily focused on building web and PWA (Progressive Web Apps) with a responsive design to function across various devices.

2. **Integration with Vue.js and Angular**: NativeScript seamlessly integrates with Angular and Vue.js, providing developers with familiar tools and components for building mobile applications. On the other hand, Quasar Framework is built on top of Vue.js, offering a wide range of Vue-specific features and components for web development.

3. **Programming Language**: NativeScript uses JavaScript and TypeScript to develop mobile applications, enabling developers to utilize their existing skills in these languages. In contrast, Quasar Framework is based on Vue.js, allowing developers to use HTML, CSS, and JavaScript to create websites and PWAs.

4. **UI Components**: NativeScript comes with a set of pre-built UI components that can be customized for different platforms, offering a native look and feel for mobile applications. Quasar Framework provides a wide range of responsive UI components designed for web development, with material design and iOS themes available out of the box.

5. **Build Process**: NativeScript uses a CLI-based build process for compiling and packaging mobile applications, enabling developers to target specific platforms and generate APK or IPA files for distribution. Quasar Framework utilizes a build system based on Webpack, allowing developers to bundle resources, optimize assets, and deploy web applications with ease.

6. **Community and Ecosystem**: NativeScript has a dedicated community of developers and contributors, along with extensive documentation and support resources to help developers build mobile applications. Quasar Framework also has a strong community backing, with active development and a vibrant ecosystem of plugins, themes, and extensions available for web development projects.

In Summary, the key differences between NativeScript and Quasar Framework lie in their supported platforms, integration with frontend frameworks, programming languages, UI components, build processes, and community support. Each framework offers unique advantages for developers based on their project requirements and expertise in web or mobile app development.