StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. NativeScript vs Quasar Framework

NativeScript vs Quasar Framework

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NativeScript
NativeScript
Stacks533
Followers1.1K
Votes516
GitHub Stars25.3K
Forks1.7K
Quasar Framework
Quasar Framework
Stacks451
Followers771
Votes404
GitHub Stars26.9K
Forks3.7K

NativeScript vs Quasar Framework: What are the differences?

## Introduction
In this Markdown code snippet, we will outline the key differences between NativeScript and Quasar Framework for website development.

1. **Supported Platforms**: NativeScript allows developers to build cross-platform mobile applications using a single codebase for both iOS and Android platforms, while Quasar Framework is primarily focused on building web and PWA (Progressive Web Apps) with a responsive design to function across various devices.
   
2. **Integration with Vue.js and Angular**: NativeScript seamlessly integrates with Angular and Vue.js, providing developers with familiar tools and components for building mobile applications. On the other hand, Quasar Framework is built on top of Vue.js, offering a wide range of Vue-specific features and components for web development.

3. **Programming Language**: NativeScript uses JavaScript and TypeScript to develop mobile applications, enabling developers to utilize their existing skills in these languages. In contrast, Quasar Framework is based on Vue.js, allowing developers to use HTML, CSS, and JavaScript to create websites and PWAs.

4. **UI Components**: NativeScript comes with a set of pre-built UI components that can be customized for different platforms, offering a native look and feel for mobile applications. Quasar Framework provides a wide range of responsive UI components designed for web development, with material design and iOS themes available out of the box.

5. **Build Process**: NativeScript uses a CLI-based build process for compiling and packaging mobile applications, enabling developers to target specific platforms and generate APK or IPA files for distribution. Quasar Framework utilizes a build system based on Webpack, allowing developers to bundle resources, optimize assets, and deploy web applications with ease.

6. **Community and Ecosystem**: NativeScript has a dedicated community of developers and contributors, along with extensive documentation and support resources to help developers build mobile applications. Quasar Framework also has a strong community backing, with active development and a vibrant ecosystem of plugins, themes, and extensions available for web development projects.

In Summary, the key differences between NativeScript and Quasar Framework lie in their supported platforms, integration with frontend frameworks, programming languages, UI components, build processes, and community support. Each framework offers unique advantages for developers based on their project requirements and expertise in web or mobile app development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

NativeScript
NativeScript
Quasar Framework
Quasar Framework

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

100% Access to Native Platform API;NativeScript is free of charge as an open source project;Code with JavaScript. Style with CSS;Cross-platform UI abstractions;Shared business logic and data models
SPAs (Single Page App); SSR (Server-side Rendered App); PWAs (Progressive Web App); Mobile apps (Android, iOS, …); Electron; Vue.js; Full RTL support; Persian calendar; Material design 2; Complete documentation; Unit test ready
Statistics
GitHub Stars
25.3K
GitHub Stars
26.9K
GitHub Forks
1.7K
GitHub Forks
3.7K
Stacks
533
Stacks
451
Followers
1.1K
Followers
771
Votes
516
Votes
404
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 75
    Access to the entire native api
  • 47
    Support for native ios and android libraries
  • 46
    Support for javascript libraries
  • 46
    Angular 2.0 support
  • 44
    Native ux and performance
Cons
  • 5
    Lack of promotion
  • 1
    Slower Performance compared to competitors
Pros
  • 59
    Excellent documentation
  • 44
    Deploy one codebase to web, desktop, mobile, and more
  • 40
    Lots of UI components
  • 39
    Extensive collection of components
  • 33
    Being able to bundle for almost all platform is awesome
Cons
  • 4
    Stackoverflow 1.5k Questions
Integrations
No integrations available
Linux
Linux
Electron
Electron
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows
Vue.js
Vue.js
Material Design
Material Design

What are some alternatives to NativeScript, Quasar Framework?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase