StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Apache Tomcat vs Netty

Apache Tomcat vs Netty

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Stacks16.9K
Followers12.6K
Votes201
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks5.3K
Netty
Netty
Stacks264
Followers408
Votes17
GitHub Stars34.6K
Forks16.2K

Apache Tomcat vs Netty: What are the differences?

Apache Tomcat and Netty are both popular server frameworks used in web development. While they share similarities, there are key differences between the two that make them suitable for different use cases.

  1. Architecture: Apache Tomcat is a traditional Servlet container built on the Java Servlet API. It follows a thread-per-request model where each request is processed by a dedicated thread. On the other hand, Netty is an event-driven, asynchronous framework that uses a small number of threads to handle a large number of connections. This allows Netty to achieve higher scalability and performance compared to Tomcat.

  2. Protocol Support: Apache Tomcat primarily focuses on HTTP and Servlet protocols. It provides extensive support for handling HTTP requests and serving Servlet-based applications. Netty, on the other hand, is protocol-agnostic and can handle various protocols such as HTTP, WebSocket, TCP, UDP, and more. It provides a flexible and extensible framework for building different types of server applications.

  3. Flexibility and Extensibility: Apache Tomcat is a monolithic server framework that provides a comprehensive set of functionalities out of the box. It offers a wide range of configuration options and features specifically designed for Servlet-based applications. Netty, on the other hand, is a lightweight and modular framework that allows developers to have more fine-grained control over the server configuration. It offers a plugin-based architecture that makes it easy to extend its capabilities and add custom features.

  4. Concurrency Model: Apache Tomcat uses a thread-per-request model, where each incoming request is assigned to a separate thread. This model can lead to high thread overhead and limited scalability under heavy load. Netty, on the other hand, uses an event-driven model with non-blocking I/O. It leverages a small number of threads to handle multiple connections concurrently, making it highly scalable and efficient even under high load conditions.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Apache Tomcat has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and a wide range of third-party libraries and tools specifically catered to Servlet-based applications. Netty, although less mainstream, also has an active community and a growing ecosystem.

  6. Use Cases: Apache Tomcat is a mature and widely used framework primarily designed for Servlet-based web applications. It is a popular choice for hosting Java-based web applications and is often used in conjunction with the Spring framework. Netty, on the other hand, is commonly used for building high-performance and scalable server applications that require handling a large number of concurrent connections, such as real-time communication systems, proxy servers, and other network-focused applications.

In summary, Apache Tomcat and Netty differ in their architecture, protocol support, flexibility, concurrency model, community, ecosystem, and use cases. While Tomcat is more suitable for traditional Servlet-based web applications, Netty shines in scenarios that require high scalability, performance, and support for various protocols.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache Tomcat, Netty

Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Netty
Netty

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Netty is a NIO client server framework which enables quick and easy development of network applications such as protocol servers and clients. It greatly simplifies and streamlines network programming such as TCP and UDP socket server.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Stars
34.6K
GitHub Forks
5.3K
GitHub Forks
16.2K
Stacks
16.9K
Stacks
264
Followers
12.6K
Followers
408
Votes
201
Votes
17
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 79
    Easy
  • 72
    Java
  • 49
    Popular
  • 1
    Spring web
Cons
  • 3
    Blocking - each http request block a thread
  • 2
    Easy to set up
Pros
  • 9
    High Performance
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Just like it
  • 1
    Easy to learn
Cons
  • 2
    Limited resources to learn from

What are some alternatives to Apache Tomcat, Netty?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Akka

Akka

Akka is a toolkit and runtime for building highly concurrent, distributed, and resilient message-driven applications on the JVM.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Orleans

Orleans

Orleans is a framework that provides a straightforward approach to building distributed high-scale computing applications, without the need to learn and apply complex concurrency or other scaling patterns. It was created by Microsoft Research and designed for use in the cloud.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase