Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

linkerd

129
312
+ 1
7
NGINX

113.3K
60.9K
+ 1
5.5K
Add tool

linkerd vs nginx: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will provide the key differences between linkerd and nginx, two popular web server solutions. We will describe these differences in specific paragraphs and format them as Markdown code that can be used in a website.

  1. Implementation and Purpose: Linkerd is a service mesh for cloud-native applications that focuses on providing observability, resilience, and security to microservices architectures. It is designed to transparently handle service-to-service communication and offers features like automatic retries, circuit breaking, and load balancing. On the other hand, nginx is a high-performance web server used to serve web content, handle reverse proxying, and perform load balancing. It is often utilized as a standalone server or as a reverse proxy in front of other web servers.

  2. Protocols Supported: Linkerd operates at the application layer and can work with any application that uses HTTP or gRPC as its transport protocol. It can handle traffic in modern microservices architectures based on containers and orchestration systems like Kubernetes. In contrast, nginx supports a wide range of protocols including HTTP, HTTPS, HTTP/2, SMTP, POP3, and IMAP. It can also act as an SSL/TLS termination point for secure connections.

  3. Load Balancing Approach: Linkerd provides a service discovery feature that enables dynamic load balancing by automatically routing traffic to healthy instances of a service. It uses techniques like load balancing weights and fine-grained routing rules to achieve load balancing among service instances. On the other hand, nginx implements load balancing algorithms like round-robin, IP hash, and least connections to distribute traffic among backend servers. It offers more control over load balancing configurations and can be easily integrated with external load balancing services.

  4. Service Mesh Features: Linkerd offers advanced service mesh features such as traffic splitting, automatic mTLS (mutual Transport Layer Security) encryption, request-level telemetry, and service-level dashboards for monitoring application performance. These features enable fine-grained control over service-to-service communication and provide insights into the behavior of microservices. In contrast, nginx primarily focuses on serving web content and performing reverse proxying. While it does offer some advanced features like caching, rate limiting, and gzip compression, it doesn't provide the extensive service mesh capabilities offered by Linkerd.

  5. Deployment and Configuration: Linkerd is designed to be easily deployed in Kubernetes clusters and integrates well with container orchestration systems. It is deployed as a sidecar proxy alongside each service instance and requires minimal configuration for basic functionality. Nginx, on the other hand, can be deployed on any server or virtual machine and can work with various deployment scenarios. It often requires more manual configuration for setting up reverse proxying, load balancing, or other advanced features.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Linkerd has a vibrant community and active maintainers. It is part of the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) projects and benefits from the wider cloud-native ecosystem that includes tools like Prometheus and Grafana for monitoring. Nginx also has a large community and is widely adopted as a web server and reverse proxy. It has an extensive ecosystem of plugins and modules that provide additional functionality for tasks like caching, security, or content delivery.

In Summary, Linkerd and nginx are web server solutions with key differences. Linkerd focuses on providing service mesh capabilities for microservices architectures, while nginx primarily serves as a web server and reverse proxy. Linkerd excels in handling service-to-service communication, automatic retrying, and offering observability features, while nginx offers a wide range of protocols support, load balancing algorithms, and a larger community ecosystem.

Advice on linkerd and NGINX

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!

See more
Replies (1)
Simon Aronsson
Developer Advocate at k6 / Load Impact · | 4 upvotes · 719.6K views
Recommends
on
NGINXNGINX

I would pick nginx over both IIS and Apace HTTP Server any day. Combine it with docker, and as you grow maybe even traefik, and you'll have a really flexible solution for serving http content where you can take sites and projects up and down without effort, easily move it between systems and dont have to handle any dependencies on your actual local machine.

See more
Needs advice
on
Apache HTTP ServerApache HTTP Server
and
NGINXNGINX

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

See more
Replies (3)
Recommends
on
NGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

See more
Leandro Barral
Recommends
on
NGINXNGINX

I use nginx because its more flexible and easy to configure

See more
Christian Cwienk
Software Developer at SAP · | 1 upvotes · 685.5K views
Recommends
on
Apache HTTP ServerApache HTTP Server

I use Apache HTTP Server because it's intuitive, comprehensive, well-documented, and just works

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of linkerd
Pros of NGINX
  • 3
    CNCF Project
  • 1
    Service Mesh
  • 1
    Fast Integration
  • 1
    Pre-check permissions
  • 1
    Light Weight
  • 1.4K
    High-performance http server
  • 894
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
  • 289
    Free
  • 288
    Scalability
  • 226
    Web server
  • 175
    Simplicity
  • 136
    Easy setup
  • 30
    Content caching
  • 21
    Web Accelerator
  • 15
    Capability
  • 14
    Fast
  • 12
    High-latency
  • 12
    Predictability
  • 8
    Reverse Proxy
  • 7
    The best of them
  • 7
    Supports http/2
  • 5
    Great Community
  • 5
    Lots of Modules
  • 5
    Enterprise version
  • 4
    High perfomance proxy server
  • 3
    Embedded Lua scripting
  • 3
    Streaming media delivery
  • 3
    Streaming media
  • 3
    Reversy Proxy
  • 2
    Blash
  • 2
    GRPC-Web
  • 2
    Lightweight
  • 2
    Fast and easy to set up
  • 2
    Slim
  • 2
    saltstack
  • 1
    Virtual hosting
  • 1
    Narrow focus. Easy to configure. Fast
  • 1
    Along with Redis Cache its the Most superior
  • 1
    Ingress controller

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of linkerd
Cons of NGINX
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 10
      Advanced features require subscription

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is linkerd?

    linkerd is an out-of-process network stack for microservices. It functions as a transparent RPC proxy, handling everything needed to make inter-service RPC safe and sane--including load-balancing, service discovery, instrumentation, and routing.

    What is NGINX?

    nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use linkerd?
    What companies use NGINX?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with linkerd?
    What tools integrate with NGINX?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to linkerd and NGINX?
    Istio
    Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.
    HAProxy
    HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.
    Kubernetes
    Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
    Hystrix
    Hystrix is a latency and fault tolerance library designed to isolate points of access to remote systems, services and 3rd party libraries, stop cascading failure and enable resilience in complex distributed systems where failure is inevitable.
    Consul
    Consul is a tool for service discovery and configuration. Consul is distributed, highly available, and extremely scalable.
    See all alternatives