StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Apache Tomcat vs nginx

Apache Tomcat vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Stacks16.9K
Followers12.6K
Votes201
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks5.3K

Apache Tomcat vs nginx: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Tomcat and Nginx are both web server software that can be used to serve web content. However, there are key differences between the two that make them suitable for different use cases.

  1. Architecture: Apache Tomcat is a Java-based web server that is designed specifically for Java web applications. It can also be used as a servlet container for running Java Servlets and JavaServer Pages (JSP). Nginx, on the other hand, is a lightweight and high-performance web server that can also function as a reverse proxy, load balancer, and HTTP cache server. It is known for its ability to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently.

  2. Configuration: Apache Tomcat uses XML configuration files to define its settings and behavior. This can sometimes make the configuration process complex and more time-consuming. Nginx, on the other hand, uses a simple and intuitive configuration language that is easy to understand and manage. This makes it quicker and easier to configure and maintain Nginx servers.

  3. Static Content: Apache Tomcat is primarily designed for serving dynamic content generated by Java web applications. It can also serve static content, but it is not as efficient or performant as Nginx for this purpose. Nginx excels in serving static content and is often used as a front-end server for static file delivery or as a reverse proxy for dynamic content, offloading the dynamic content generation to backend servers.

  4. SSL/TLS Termination: Apache Tomcat has limited support for SSL/TLS termination, and its configuration can sometimes be complex. Nginx, on the other hand, provides robust and efficient SSL/TLS termination and can handle a large number of SSL/TLS connections while offloading the encryption and decryption overhead from backend servers. This makes Nginx a popular choice for handling secure connections.

  5. Caching: Nginx is known for its powerful caching capabilities, allowing it to serve cached content directly from memory or disk without invoking backend servers. It supports various caching strategies, including proxy caching, fastCGI caching, and HTTP caching. Apache Tomcat does not have built-in caching capabilities, although caching can be implemented within Java web applications running on Tomcat.

  6. Concurrency: Nginx is designed to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently, making it an ideal choice for high-traffic websites or applications. It uses an event-driven asynchronous architecture that allows it to handle thousands of connections with low memory usage. Apache Tomcat, while capable of handling concurrent connections, may not scale as efficiently as Nginx in terms of handling a massive number of simultaneous connections.

In Summary, Apache Tomcat is a Java-based web server primarily focused on running Java web applications, while Nginx is a versatile web server designed for high performance, scalability, and handling of concurrent connections. Nginx excels in serving static content, SSL/TLS termination, caching, and handling high traffic, making it a popular choice for many web applications and websites.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NGINX, Apache Tomcat

Daniel
Daniel

Co-Founder at Polpo Data Analytics & Software Development

May 25, 2021

Decided

For us, NGINX is a lite HTTP server easy to configure. On our research, we found a well-documented software we a lot of support from the community.

We have been using it alongside tools like certbot and it has been a total success.

We can easily configure our sites and have a folder for available vs enabled sites, and with the nginx -t command we can easily check everything is running fine.

289k views289k
Comments
Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments
greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NGINX
NGINX
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
5.3K
Stacks
115.0K
Stacks
16.9K
Followers
61.9K
Followers
12.6K
Votes
5.5K
Votes
201
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
Pros
  • 79
    Easy
  • 72
    Java
  • 49
    Popular
  • 1
    Spring web
Cons
  • 3
    Blocking - each http request block a thread
  • 2
    Easy to set up

What are some alternatives to NGINX, Apache Tomcat?

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Caddy

Caddy

Caddy 2 is a powerful, enterprise-ready, open source web server with automatic HTTPS written in Go.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase