Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Nuclide vs Visual Studio Code: What are the differences?
Introduction: In this comparison, we will identify the key differences between Nuclide and Visual Studio Code, two popular Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) used for software development.
- Supported Languages: Nuclide is primarily designed for JavaScript and React developers, offering robust support for these languages. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, supports a wider range of languages and frameworks, making it a versatile option for developers working on various platforms.
- Integration with Version Control: Nuclide has seamless integration with the version control system Mercurial, which can be beneficial for developers who use this specific system. Visual Studio Code, however, offers built-in support for Git, a widely used version control system, making it a preferred choice for many developers.
- Customization Options: Visual Studio Code provides extensive customization options through its marketplace, allowing users to install various extensions and themes to tailor the IDE to their preferences. Nuclide, on the other hand, has a more limited selection of extensions and themes available for customization.
- Debugging Capabilities: Visual Studio Code offers robust debugging capabilities with features like breakpoints, variable inspection, and integrated debugging tools for different programming languages. Nuclide also supports debugging but may not offer the same level of functionality and versatility as Visual Studio Code in this aspect.
- Community Support: Visual Studio Code has a larger user community and extensive documentation, which can be beneficial for beginners seeking help and resources. Nuclide, although supported by Facebook, may have a smaller user base and fewer community-contributed resources available.
- Performance and Resource Usage: Visual Studio Code is known for its fast performance and low resource usage, making it a lightweight and efficient IDE for various development tasks. Nuclide, being more specialized, may have different performance characteristics that could impact the user experience in certain scenarios.
In Summary, Nuclide and Visual Studio Code differ in their supported languages, integration with version control systems, customization options, debugging capabilities, community support, and performance characteristics.
Lightweight and versatile. Huge library of extensions that enable you to integrate a host of services to your development environment. VS Code's biggest strength is its library of extensions which enables it to directly compete with every single major IDE for almost all major programming languages.
Visual Studio Code became famous over the past 3+ years I believe. The clean UI, easy to use UX and the plethora of integrations made it a very easy decision for us. Our gripe with Sublime was probably only the UX side. VSCode has not failed us till now, and still is able to support our development env without any significant effort.
Goland being paid, as well as built only for Go seemed like a significant limitation to not consider it.
I decided to choose VSCode over Sublime text for my Systems Programming class in C. What I love about VSCode is its awesome ability to add extensions. Intellisense is a beautiful debugger, and Remote SSH allows me to login and make real-time changes in VSCode to files on my university server. This is an awesome alternative to going back and forth on pushing/pulling code and logging into servers in the terminal. Great choice for anyone interested in C programming!
Pros of Nuclide
- Remote development with SSH8
- Open Source7
- Very Fast4
- Built By Facebook4
- Autocomplete4
- Web and mobile development4
- Free2
- Smart auto-completion2
- Can do anything Atom can2
- Git integration1
- Support for Flow1
- VIM integration1
Pros of Visual Studio Code
- Powerful multilanguage IDE340
- Fast308
- Front-end develop out of the box193
- Support TypeScript IntelliSense158
- Very basic but free142
- Git integration126
- Intellisense106
- Faster than Atom78
- Better ui, easy plugins, and nice git integration53
- Great Refactoring Tools45
- Good Plugins44
- Terminal42
- Superb markdown support38
- Open Source36
- Extensions35
- Awesome UI26
- Large & up-to-date extension community26
- Powerful and fast24
- Portable22
- Best code editor18
- Best editor18
- Easy to get started with17
- Lots of extensions15
- Good for begginers15
- Crossplatform15
- Built on Electron15
- Extensions for everything14
- Open, cross-platform, fast, monthly updates14
- All Languages Support14
- Easy to use and learn13
- "fast, stable & easy to use"12
- Extensible12
- Ui design is great11
- Totally customizable11
- Git out of the box11
- Useful for begginer11
- Faster edit for slow computer11
- SSH support10
- Great community10
- Fast Startup10
- Works With Almost EveryThing You Need9
- Great language support9
- Powerful Debugger9
- It has terminal and there are lots of shortcuts in it9
- Can compile and run .py files8
- Python extension is fast8
- Features rich7
- Great document formater7
- He is not Michael6
- Extension Echosystem6
- She is not Rachel6
- Awesome multi cursor support6
- VSCode.pro Course makes it easy to learn5
- Language server client5
- SFTP Workspace5
- Very proffesional5
- Easy azure5
- Has better support and more extentions for debugging4
- Supports lots of operating systems4
- Excellent as git difftool and mergetool4
- Virtualenv integration4
- Better autocompletes than Atom3
- Has more than enough languages for any developer3
- 'batteries included'3
- More tools to integrate with vs3
- Emmet preinstalled3
- VS Code Server: Browser version of VS Code2
- CMake support with autocomplete2
- Microsoft2
- Customizable2
- Light2
- Big extension marketplace2
- Fast and ruby is built right in2
- File:///C:/Users/ydemi/Downloads/yuksel_demirkaya_webpa1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Nuclide
Cons of Visual Studio Code
- Slow startup46
- Resource hog at times29
- Poor refactoring20
- Poor UI Designer13
- Weak Ui design tools11
- Poor autocomplete10
- Super Slow8
- Huge cpu usage with few installed extension8
- Microsoft sends telemetry data8
- Poor in PHP7
- It's MicroSoft6
- Poor in Python3
- No Built in Browser Preview3
- No color Intergrator3
- Very basic for java development and buggy at times3
- No built in live Preview3
- Electron3
- Bad Plugin Architecture2
- Powered by Electron2
- Terminal does not identify path vars sometimes1
- Slow C++ Language Server1