Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Okta vs Ping Identity: What are the differences?
Introduction
Okta and Ping Identity are both identity and access management (IAM) solutions that help organizations centrally manage and secure user identities and access to applications and resources. While they share some similarities, there are key differences between the two platforms.
Cloud-native vs. On-Premises: Okta is a cloud-native IAM solution, which means it is delivered as a service and hosted in the cloud. On the other hand, Ping Identity offers both cloud-based and on-premises options, providing organizations with more flexibility in choosing their deployment model.
Third-party Integrations: Okta has a large ecosystem of third-party integrations, allowing organizations to easily connect their applications with Okta's identity platform. Ping Identity also offers integrations, but its ecosystem may not be as extensive as Okta's.
User Experience: Okta is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive user experience. It offers a highly customizable and seamless login experience for end-users. Ping Identity also provides a good user experience but may require more configuration and customization to achieve the same level of simplicity as Okta.
Adaptive Authentification: Okta offers adaptive authentication, which uses contextual information such as device, location, and user behavior to dynamically assess the level of risk and apply appropriate authentication measures. Ping Identity also offers similar capabilities, but the level of granularity and sophistication may vary.
Single Sign-On Capabilities: Both Okta and Ping Identity provide single sign-on (SSO) functionality. However, Okta's SSO capabilities are often praised for their ease of use and extensive pre-built integrations, while Ping Identity may require more configuration and custom development to achieve the same level of SSO functionality.
Pricing Model: The pricing models of Okta and Ping Identity differ. Okta typically offers subscription-based pricing, which includes different tiers based on the features and number of users. Ping Identity's pricing model may vary depending on the deployment mode, whether it is on-premises, cloud-based, or a hybrid solution.
In Summary, Okta and Ping Identity differ in their deployment model, integrations, user experience, adaptive authentication capabilities, single sign-on functionality, and pricing models.
Pros of Okta
- REST API14
- SAML9
- OIDC OpenID Connect5
- Protect B2E, B2B, B2C apps5
- User Provisioning5
- Easy LDAP integration5
- Universal Directory4
- Tons of Identity Management features4
- SSO, MFA for cloud, on-prem, custom apps4
- API Access Management - oAuth2 as a service4
- Easy Active Directory integration3
- SWA applications Integration2
- SOC21
- Test0
Pros of Ping Identity
- OIDC4
- SSO3
- SAML3
- IdP3
- OAUTH 2.02
- Social Provider2
- LDAP2
- Third Party IdP2
- Enterprise-grade2
- On-prem integrations2
- Passwordless1
- SP1
- JWT1
- Mobile SDK1
- Authorization1
- Access Management1
- User Provisioning1
- CIAM1
- IAM1
- IDaaS1
- Authentication1
- REST API1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Okta
- Pricing is too high5
- Okta verify (Multi-factor Authentication)1