StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Cloud Hosting
  4. Open Source Cloud
  5. OpenStack vs Squid

OpenStack vs Squid

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OpenStack
OpenStack
Stacks790
Followers1.2K
Votes138
Squid
Squid
Stacks101
Followers205
Votes17
GitHub Stars2.7K
Forks594

OpenStack vs Squid: What are the differences?

Introduction: OpenStack and Squid are both used in the realm of cloud computing, but they serve different purposes and have distinct functionalities.

  1. Deployment Flexibility: OpenStack is an open-source cloud computing platform that allows users to deploy and manage a variety of cloud-based services, including virtual machines, object storage, and networking, among others. On the other hand, Squid is a caching proxy server that primarily focuses on optimizing web content delivery by caching frequently accessed resources locally to speed up data retrieval.

  2. Scalability: OpenStack is designed to be highly scalable, allowing users to easily scale resources up or down based on their needs. It provides an infrastructure that can grow with the demands of the users. In contrast, Squid is more suited for optimizing smaller-scale web traffic and may not offer the same level of scalability as OpenStack.

  3. Resource Management: OpenStack offers comprehensive resource management capabilities, allowing users to allocate and manage resources efficiently across various cloud services. It provides features for monitoring and optimizing resource usage. Squid, on the other hand, focuses on improving performance through caching mechanisms, rather than resource allocation and management.

  4. Networking Capabilities: OpenStack includes robust networking capabilities, allowing users to define and manage their network infrastructure within the cloud environment. It provides tools for creating virtual networks, routers, and firewalls. In comparison, Squid does not offer extensive networking functionalities and is primarily focused on optimizing web content delivery through caching.

  5. Storage Options: OpenStack provides diverse storage options, including block storage, object storage, and file storage solutions. Users can choose the most suitable storage solution for their specific requirements. Squid, however, does not focus on storage solutions and is more oriented towards caching and optimizing web traffic.

  6. Security Features: OpenStack incorporates various security features to ensure the protection of cloud resources and data. It offers tools for authentication, authorization, and encryption. Squid, while it may provide some basic security features, is not primarily focused on security aspects and may not offer the same level of security functionalities as OpenStack.

In Summary, OpenStack and Squid differ in deployment flexibility, scalability, resource management, networking capabilities, storage options, and security features, catering to distinct needs in cloud computing environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenStack
OpenStack
Squid
Squid

OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.

Squid reduces bandwidth and improves response times by caching and reusing frequently-requested web pages. Squid has extensive access controls and makes a great server accelerator. It runs on most available operating systems, including Windows and is licensed under the GNU GPL.

Compute;Storage;Networking;Dashboard;Shared Services
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
2.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
594
Stacks
790
Stacks
101
Followers
1.2K
Followers
205
Votes
138
Votes
17
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 60
    Private cloud
  • 39
    Avoid vendor lock-in
  • 23
    Flexible in use
  • 7
    Industry leader
  • 5
    Robust architecture
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to config
  • 2
    Very Fast
  • 2
    Cluster
  • 2
    Web application accelerator
  • 1
    Very Stable

What are some alternatives to OpenStack, Squid?

Varnish

Varnish

Varnish Cache is a web application accelerator also known as a caching HTTP reverse proxy. You install it in front of any server that speaks HTTP and configure it to cache the contents. Varnish Cache is really, really fast. It typically speeds up delivery with a factor of 300 - 1000x, depending on your architecture.

Apache CloudStack

Apache CloudStack

CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.

Section

Section

Edge Compute Platform gives Dev and Ops engineers the access and control they need to run compute workloads on a distributed edge.

Nuster

Nuster

nuster is a high performance HTTP proxy cache server and RESTful NoSQL cache server based on HAProxy.

VirtKick

VirtKick

Software as a service platform for hosting providers.

Apache Traffic Server

Apache Traffic Server

It is a fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2.0 compliant caching proxy server.Improve your response time, while reducing server load and bandwidth needs by caching and reusing frequently-requested web pages, images, and web ser

OpenNebula

OpenNebula

It provides a simple but feature-rich and flexible solution for the comprehensive management of virtualized data centers to enable on-premise enterprise clouds in existing infrastructures. It can be primarily used as a virtualization tool to manage your virtual infrastructure in the data-center or cluster, which is usually referred as Private Cloud. It supports Hybrid Cloud to combine local infrastructure with public cloud-based infrastructure, enabling highly scalable hosting environments.

Eucalyptus

Eucalyptus

Eucalyptus is open source software for building private, AWS-compatible IT, QA, and developer clouds. It makes it easy to deliver cloud computing, just like AWS, from within your data center.

Ubicloud

Ubicloud

It is an open, free, and portable cloud. Think of it as an open alternative to cloud providers, like what Linux is to proprietary operating systems. It provides IaaS cloud features on bare metal providers, such as Hetzner, OVH, and AWS Bare Metal.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana