StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Cloud Hosting
  4. Open Source Cloud
  5. OpenStack vs Xen Orchestra

OpenStack vs Xen Orchestra

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OpenStack
OpenStack
Stacks790
Followers1.2K
Votes138
Xen Orchestra
Xen Orchestra
Stacks13
Followers19
Votes0
GitHub Stars901
Forks291

OpenStack vs Xen Orchestra: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of cloud computing, two popular platforms stand out: OpenStack and Xen Orchestra. While both offer powerful and comprehensive solutions for managing cloud environments, there are key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore these differences to help you make an informed decision for your cloud infrastructure needs.

  1. Architecture: OpenStack is an open-source cloud computing platform that is designed to be highly scalable and flexible. It follows a modular architecture, allowing users to select and integrate specific components to build their custom cloud environment. On the other hand, Xen Orchestra is a web-based management interface for the Xen hypervisor. It provides a simplified and streamlined experience for managing Xen-based virtualization infrastructure.

  2. Community and Support: OpenStack boasts a large and vibrant community of developers and users. It benefits from the contributions and support of numerous companies and organizations, ensuring a wide range of resources and knowledge for users. In contrast, Xen Orchestra has a smaller community but maintains a dedicated and active user base. It offers commercial support options, providing a more personalized and comprehensive level of assistance.

  3. Feature Set: OpenStack provides a comprehensive suite of services and features, including virtual machine management, networking, storage, and more. It offers a high degree of flexibility and customization, allowing users to tailor their cloud environment to their specific needs. Xen Orchestra, on the other hand, focuses primarily on virtualization management. It provides features like virtual machine creation, migration, backup, and monitoring, with a strong emphasis on ease of use and simplicity.

  4. Integration: OpenStack is designed to be highly integrable with other technologies and platforms. It offers robust APIs and supports various industry standards, making it easier to integrate with existing infrastructure and third-party tools. Xen Orchestra, being a management interface for Xen, provides seamless integration with Xen-based virtualization environments, allowing users to leverage the full capabilities of the Xen hypervisor.

  5. Scalability: OpenStack is known for its ability to scale horizontally, allowing users to add and remove compute, storage, and networking resources as needed. It provides automated scaling and orchestration capabilities, making it suitable for large-scale deployments. Xen Orchestra, while not as scalable as OpenStack, can still manage a significant number of virtual machines and provides features like live migration and high-availability, ensuring seamless operation and workload distribution.

  6. Ease of Deployment: OpenStack, being a comprehensive cloud computing platform, requires careful planning and expertise for deployment. It offers flexibility in choosing various deployment options, such as using vendor-specific distributions or building a custom deployment. On the other hand, Xen Orchestra simplifies the deployment process by providing a ready-to-use web-based interface. It can be easily installed on a server running Xen, allowing users to quickly set up and start managing their virtualization infrastructure.

In summary, OpenStack is a highly scalable, feature-rich, and customizable cloud computing platform with a large community and extensive integration capabilities. Xen Orchestra, on the other hand, provides a user-friendly management interface for Xen virtualization environments, offering simplicity and ease of use. The choice between the two depends on specific requirements, scalability needs, and the level of customization desired for your cloud infrastructure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenStack
OpenStack
Xen Orchestra
Xen Orchestra

OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.

It provides a web based UI for the management of XenServer installations without requiring any agent or extra software on your hosts nor VMs.

Compute;Storage;Networking;Dashboard;Shared Services
Xen management; Easy-to-use; Fast; Easy migration
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
901
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
291
Stacks
790
Stacks
13
Followers
1.2K
Followers
19
Votes
138
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 60
    Private cloud
  • 39
    Avoid vendor lock-in
  • 23
    Flexible in use
  • 7
    Industry leader
  • 5
    Robust architecture
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Packer
Packer
CloudConvert
CloudConvert
ScaleGrid
ScaleGrid
RunAbove
RunAbove
Neptune.io
Neptune.io
Morpheus
Morpheus

What are some alternatives to OpenStack, Xen Orchestra?

Vagrant

Vagrant

Vagrant provides the framework and configuration format to create and manage complete portable development environments. These development environments can live on your computer or in the cloud, and are portable between Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Ant Design

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

boot2docker

boot2docker

boot2docker is a lightweight Linux distribution based on Tiny Core Linux made specifically to run Docker containers. It runs completely from RAM, weighs ~27MB and boots in ~5s (YMMV).

Apache CloudStack

Apache CloudStack

CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.

React Rainbow

React Rainbow

It is a collection of components that will reliably help you build your application in a snap. More than 60 components built on top of React.

Chakra UI

Chakra UI

It is a simple, modular and accessible component library that gives you all the building blocks you need to build your React applications.

MD Bootstrap

MD Bootstrap

It is a UI kit built with an aim to cut the time developers need to create their websites by taking all the best features from vanilla Bootstrap and enhancing them with a distinctive design from Google.

Otto

Otto

Otto automatically builds development environments without any configuration; it can detect your project type and has built-in knowledge of industry-standard tools to setup a development environment that is ready to go. When you're ready to deploy, otto builds and manages an infrastructure, sets up servers, builds, and deploys the application.

libvirt

libvirt

It is an open-source API, daemon and management tool for managing platform virtualization. It can be used to manage KVM, Xen, VMware ESXi, QEMU and other virtualization technologies.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot