StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtual Private Cloud
  5. OpenVPN vs Openswan

OpenVPN vs Openswan

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OpenVPN
OpenVPN
Stacks277
Followers164
Votes0
Openswan
Openswan
Stacks4
Followers13
Votes0
GitHub Stars868
Forks213

OpenVPN vs Openswan: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between OpenVPN and Openswan. Both OpenVPN and Openswan are virtual private network (VPN) software that provide secure and encrypted connections over the internet. However, there are several important differences between these two VPN solutions that we will discuss below.

  1. Protocol support: OpenVPN uses the secure and widely adopted SSL/TLS (Secure Sockets Layer/Transport Layer Security) protocol to establish VPN connections. On the other hand, Openswan primarily relies on the IPsec (Internet Protocol Security) protocol suite to create secure VPN tunnels.

  2. Flexibility: OpenVPN is known for its flexibility and versatility. It can operate over various network protocols such as UDP (User Datagram Protocol) and TCP (Transmission Control Protocol), making it suitable for different types of environments. Openswan, on the other hand, is more restricted in terms of protocol options and is primarily designed for IPsec-based VPNs.

  3. Ease of setup: OpenVPN typically has a simpler and easier setup process compared to Openswan. It provides user-friendly configuration options and has a wide range of GUI (Graphical User Interface) tools available for configuration and management. Openswan, in contrast, often requires more technical expertise to set up and configure, as it primarily relies on command-line tools and manual configurations.

  4. Portability: OpenVPN is known for its cross-platform compatibility, supporting various operating systems including Windows, macOS, Linux, and mobile platforms. It can be easily deployed on a wide range of devices, making it more versatile. On the other hand, Openswan primarily targets Linux-based systems and may require additional steps to enable compatibility with other operating systems.

  5. Performance: OpenVPN is generally regarded as having better performance than Openswan in terms of speed and efficiency. This is primarily due to OpenVPN's use of the UDP protocol by default, which provides faster data transmission for real-time applications. Openswan, being primarily based on IPsec, can suffer from higher overheads, especially when using the TCP protocol for VPN connections.

  6. Community support and development: OpenVPN has a large and active community of users and developers, providing regular updates, bug fixes, and security patches. The extensive community support ensures a stable and evolving VPN solution. Openswan, although still actively maintained, has a smaller community compared to OpenVPN and may have fewer resources and updates available.

In summary, OpenVPN and Openswan are both VPN solutions but differ in various aspects such as protocol support, flexibility, ease of setup, portability, performance, and community support. These differences make them suitable for different use cases and environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenVPN
OpenVPN
Openswan
Openswan

It provides flexible VPN solutions to secure your data communications, whether it's for Internet privacy, remote access for employees, securing IoT, or for networking Cloud data centers. Our VPN Server software solution can be deployed on-premises using standard servers or virtual appliances, or on the cloud.

It is an IPsec implementation for Linux. It has support for most of the extensions (RFC + IETF drafts) related to IPsec, including IKEv2, X.509 Digital Certificates, NAT Traversal, and many others.

-
IPsec;IKEv2;X.509 Digital Certificates;NAT Traversal
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
868
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
213
Stacks
277
Stacks
4
Followers
164
Followers
13
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Fedora
Fedora
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Debian
Debian

What are some alternatives to OpenVPN, Openswan?

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Amazon VPC

Amazon VPC

You have complete control over your virtual networking environment, including selection of your own IP address range, creation of subnets, and configuration of route tables and network gateways. You can easily customize the network configuration for your Amazon VPC.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

Clef

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

ExpeditedSSL

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Wazuh

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase