Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Paw
Paw

130
131
+ 1
146
Restlet Studio
Restlet Studio

22
32
+ 1
2
Add tool

Paw vs Restlet Studio: What are the differences?

Developers describe Paw as "The ultimate REST client for Mac". Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code. On the other hand, Restlet Studio is detailed as "The first browser-based IDE for APIs". Packaged as a Chrome extension and accessible from any modern web browser, Restlet Studio instantly provides to any developer powerful API crafting capabilities. Through an intuitive interface, developers can visually define all the elements of a web API, and automatically generate the client SDK and server skeleton of their API.

Paw and Restlet Studio can be categorized as "API" tools.

Some of the features offered by Paw are:

  • Organize your Requests, make Groups or sort by Host, Name, etc.
  • Easily build your requests, enjoy Formatters and Dynamic Values.
  • See Request and Response infos, headers, and body.

On the other hand, Restlet Studio provides the following key features:

  • Visual Crafting of APIs
  • RESTful APIs Made Easy
  • No Wasted Configuration Time
- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Paw?

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

What is Restlet Studio?

Packaged as a Chrome extension and accessible from any modern web browser, Restlet Studio instantly provides to any developer powerful API crafting capabilities. Through an intuitive interface, developers can visually define all the elements of a web API, and automatically generate the client SDK and server skeleton of their API.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Paw?
Why do developers choose Restlet Studio?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

What companies use Paw?
What companies use Restlet Studio?

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Paw?
What tools integrate with Restlet Studio?
    No integrations found
      No integrations found
      What are some alternatives to Paw and Restlet Studio?
      Postman
      It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.
      Amazon API Gateway
      Amazon API Gateway handles all the tasks involved in accepting and processing up to hundreds of thousands of concurrent API calls, including traffic management, authorization and access control, monitoring, and API version management.
      Insomnia REST Client
      Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.
      Runscope
      Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.
      RAML
      RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.
      See all alternatives
      Decisions about Paw and Restlet Studio
      Jason Barry
      Jason Barry
      Cofounder at FeaturePeek | 4 upvotes 41.4K views
      atFeaturePeekFeaturePeek
      Dropbox
      Dropbox
      Paw
      Paw
      Postman
      Postman
      Insomnia REST Client
      Insomnia REST Client

      We've tried a couple REST clients over the years, and Insomnia REST Client has won us over the most. Here's what we like about it compared to other contenders in this category:

      • Uncluttered UI. Things are only in your face when you need them, and the app is visually organized in an intuitive manner.
      • Native Mac app. We wanted the look and feel to be on par with other apps in our OS rather than a web app / Electron app (cough Postman).
      • Easy team sync. Other apps have this too, but Insomnia's model best sets the "set and forget" mentality. Syncs are near instant and I'm always assured that I'm working on the latest version of API endpoints. Apps like Paw use a git-based approach to revision history, but I think this actually over-complicates the sync feature. For ensuring I'm always working on the latest version of something, I'd rather have the sync model be closer to Dropbox's than git's, and Insomnia is closer to Dropbox in that regard.

      Some features like automatic public-facing documentation aren't supported, but we currently don't have any public APIs, so this didn't matter to us.

      See more
      Interest over time
      Reviews of Paw and Restlet Studio
      No reviews found
      How developers use Paw and Restlet Studio
      Avatar of Jack Littleton
      Jack Littleton uses PawPaw

      Paw allows me to interface with an API prior to starting UI work that requires the API. This helps me understand what data is required to be sent to the API, and what to expect back.

      In cases where I develop the API, Paw helps me to test as I'm developing, ensuring changes I make aren't breaking other parts of the API.

      Avatar of Datacoon
      Datacoon uses Restlet StudioRestlet Studio

      Easy to use

      How much does Paw cost?
      How much does Restlet Studio cost?
      Pricing unavailable
      Pricing unavailable