Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
MySQL WorkBench vs phpMyAdmin: What are the differences?
1. User Interface: MySQL Workbench and phpMyAdmin differ in terms of user interface. MySQL Workbench offers a more customizable and intuitive graphical user interface (GUI) with drag-and-drop features and visual tools for designing, modeling, and monitoring databases. On the other hand, phpMyAdmin provides a web-based interface that is simpler in design and easier to use for basic database management tasks.
2. Platform: Another difference between MySQL Workbench and phpMyAdmin is the platform on which they can be used. MySQL Workbench is a standalone application that can be installed on various operating systems such as Windows, macOS, and Linux, providing a consistent experience across platforms. In contrast, phpMyAdmin is a web-based application that requires a web server and can be accessed through a browser, making it platform-independent.
3. Advanced Features: MySQL Workbench offers more advanced features compared to phpMyAdmin. It provides functionalities like schema comparison, database migration, query optimization, and performance analysis, making it suitable for complex database management tasks and development workflows. phpMyAdmin, although capable of performing basic tasks like data manipulation and SQL query execution, does not have the same level of advanced functionalities.
4. Collaboration and Teamwork: MySQL Workbench allows for better collaboration and teamwork in database projects. It supports version control integration, team collaboration features, and synchronization with remote servers, enabling multiple developers to work on the same database and easily share changes. On the contrary, phpMyAdmin does not have built-in features for collaboration, making it less suitable for team-based database development.
5. Installation and Configuration: MySQL Workbench requires separate installation and configuration on each machine, which can be time-consuming and require administrative access. On the other hand, phpMyAdmin only requires installation on a web server, making it easier to set up and access as long as the server is running.
6. Access Control and Security: MySQL Workbench provides more granular control over user access and security settings. It allows for the management of user accounts, privileges, and roles, as well as securing connections through SSL encryption. phpMyAdmin also supports user management and SSL encryption, but it may offer fewer options and customizability in this aspect compared to MySQL Workbench.
In Summary, MySQL Workbench offers a more advanced and feature-rich database management tool with a customizable GUI, while phpMyAdmin is simpler to use and accessible through a web-based interface. MySQL Workbench is suitable for complex database management tasks and collaboration, while phpMyAdmin is more suitable for basic database management and quick access.
I am looking to build an azure database that connects to my power bi application. Initially, I attempted to create an Azure SQL database, then realized I needed to have SQL Server Management Service in order to manage and connect between Azure SQL <=> Power BI, but since I am on a Mac, I had to use the complex installation as a workaround.
If MySQL Workbench can solve this (as the product is available on Mac), I am more than happy to proceed with this approach if it can achieve the same goal of connecting an azure database with my Power BI application
What I am trying to achieve is fairly simple: have an online cloud database that connects to my Power BI application
I am open to any other solutions as well
Thank you
As others have noted, MySQL Workbench cannot be used instead of Microsoft SQL Manager to manage Azure SQL (MS-SQL Server, I hate that Microsoft uses generic category names for their products).
If you're considering switching to MySQL (Possibly using Azure MySQL managed database), then please not that unlike MS-SQL Server, you do not need the MySQL Workbench to connect your application to MysQL: just use the correct driver for your stack, and you're all set (if your stack is using the .Net platform, use MySQL Connector/NET from: https://dev.mysql.com/downloads/connector/net/ ).
If you do want to use a graphical interface to maintain your MySQL database, then MySQL Workbench is a great choice, but you are not limited to it - as others have mentioned, there is a plethora of competing graphical database management tools that would work just as well with MySQL - one of the advantages of choosing MySQL for your stack is the huge eco-system that is built around it.
Hello Could you give us a better idea of what Data Base Management System (DBMS) you are using at Azure? MySQL Workbench and Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) are tools developed to exclusively manage MySQL and SQL Server, respectively. If you need to manage multiple DBMS's from a single tool, I sugget you try DBeaver. There are also another alternatives: HeidiSQL, phpMyAdmin, etc. Regarding the DBMS itself, I suggest you stick with SQL Server. In my opinion it's more stable and has more features than MySQL - especially in the Standard and Enterprise editions. Regards, Lawrence
As far as I know, MySQL Workbench doesn't handle Microsoft connections, including Azure, you should try Microsoft solutions such as MS VS Code.
Hi Aashwiin, Looking at your stack (https://stackshare.io/aashwiin82347/my-stack), it seems you are using Azure SQL Databases. I'll infer this is Microsoft SQL Server. Therefore, it certainly makes sense you stick with some of the official Microsoft Tooling to connect to it, query and administer it. You'd only be looking at MySQL Query Workbench, if you were running and connecting to a MySQL Database. - That said, could Azure MySQL (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/mysql/overview) be an option for you a this point? MySQL offers great performance. I have been running it at various companies (under AWS/RDS and AWS/Aurora) and have no reason to switch over to anything else. - Decision making-wise, how much do your want your local sql/mysql client to influence/weigh in your architecture/technology decisions, though? This can be a slippery slope. - Alternatively, other clients exist, such as "Table Plus" and allow you to connect, on Mac, to a variety of database servers, including SQL Server. It might be worth giving it a try.
Microsoft provides an application known as Azure Data Studio that runs on Windows, Mac and Linux machines. It provides the ability to manage an Azure SQL database, as well as connecting to standard SQL Server databases. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/azure-data-studio/what-is?view=sql-server-ver15
We were looking a tool that would allow us to do MySQL and PostgreSQL development/administration from a single tool. We decided on Navicat Premium because it can connect to MySQL, MariaDB, MongoDB, SQL Server, Oracle, PostgreSQL, and SQLite databases - and simultaneously. It's also compatible with Amazon RDS and Microsoft Azure, which we also use.
Moreover, we previously experienced the occasional freezing and crashing in MySQL Workbench. It also suffered from a poor design, with certain features being a bit difficult to find. Meanwhile, phpMyAdmin lacked schema visualization tools and seemed better suited to lightweight day to day transactions than some of the big jobs that we needed to do.
Pros of MySQL WorkBench
- Free7
- Simple7
- Easy to use6
- Clean UI5
- Administration and monitoring module3
Pros of phpMyAdmin
- Query linter5
- Easy data access5
- User administration5
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of MySQL WorkBench
Cons of phpMyAdmin
- Insecure1
