Pippo vs Trails: What are the differences?
Developers describe Pippo as "Web framework in Java". It's an open source (Apache License) micro web framework in Java, with minimal dependencies and a quick learning curve. The goal of this project is to create a micro web framework in Java that should be easy to use and hack. Pippo can be used in small and medium applications and also in applications based on micro services architecture. On the other hand, Trails is detailed as "Modern Web Application Framework for Node.js". Trails is a modern, community-driven web application framework for node.js. It builds on the pedigree of Rails and Grails to accelerate development by adhering to a straightforward, convention-based, API-driven design philosophy.
Pippo and Trails can be categorized as "Microframeworks (Backend)" tools.
Pippo and Trails are both open source tools. It seems that Trails with 1.72K GitHub stars and 75 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Pippo with 716 GitHub stars and 103 GitHub forks.
What is Pippo?
What is Trails?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Pippo?
What are the cons of using Trails?
What companies use Pippo?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
The number one thing I like about Trails is that it does not force me to use any particular web server or database layer. I can choose the web server (hapi, express, etc), ORM layer (bookshelf, sequelize, waterline) and everything works with a common configuration.