Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Polymer

557
461
+ 1
122
Quasar Framework

455
766
+ 1
404
Add tool

Polymer vs Quasar Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Polymer and Quasar Framework, focusing on their key differences.

  1. Language: Polymer is a JavaScript library that uses web components to build reusable components, while Quasar Framework is built on top of Vue.js, a progressive JavaScript framework.
  2. Component Library: Polymer has its own set of built-in components, which are highly customizable and provide a wide range of functionalities. On the other hand, Quasar Framework offers a comprehensive set of pre-built components that follow Material Design guidelines.
  3. Bundler: Polymer relies on external tools like Webpack or Rollup to bundle the application, allowing developers to choose the bundler that best fits their needs. In contrast, Quasar Framework comes with its own bundler, making the setup process simpler and more streamlined.
  4. Platform-Specific Support: Polymer focuses mainly on creating web applications that work across different browsers and devices. Quasar Framework, on the other hand, provides additional support for building native mobile applications using Cordova or Electron.
  5. Documentation and Community: Polymer has extensive documentation, which includes guides, references, and examples. It also has an active online community that provides support and shares insights. Quasar Framework also has comprehensive documentation and a thriving community, but being built on top of Vue.js gives it access to an even larger community and ecosystem.
  6. Size of the Bundle: Polymer applications tend to have smaller bundle sizes compared to Quasar Framework applications. This is because Polymer uses web components, which have a smaller footprint, while Quasar Framework includes additional dependencies and components, resulting in a larger bundle size.

In summary, Polymer is a JavaScript library that focuses on building reusable components with web components, while Quasar Framework is a Vue.js-based framework that offers a comprehensive set of pre-built components and provides support for building native mobile applications. Polymer relies on external tools for bundling, while Quasar Framework has its own built-in bundler. Polymer has smaller bundle sizes due to the use of web components, while Quasar Framework includes additional dependencies and components, resulting in larger bundles.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Polymer
Pros of Quasar Framework
  • 52
    Web components
  • 30
    Material design
  • 14
    HTML
  • 13
    Components
  • 5
    Open source
  • 4
    It uses the platform
  • 3
    Designer friendly. HTMLX concepts
  • 1
    Like the interesting naming convention for elements
  • 59
    Excellent documentation
  • 44
    Deploy one codebase to web, desktop, mobile, and more
  • 40
    Lots of UI components
  • 39
    Extensive collection of components
  • 33
    Being able to bundle for almost all platform is awesome
  • 27
    Quasar App Extensions
  • 27
    Excelent performance
  • 25
    Great community
  • 20
    Open Source
  • 16
    Attention to Security
  • 15
    Material Design
  • 11
    It is easy because of vue
  • 10
    1 Cross Platform Android, IOS and Desktop
  • 10
    Cross Platform Andriod, IOS and Desktop
  • 8
    SSR
  • 7
    Vue 3 Support
  • 6
    Active and helpful community
  • 4
    Treeshaking
  • 3
    Simple to use

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Polymer
Cons of Quasar Framework
  • 1
    Last version is like 2 years ago? that's totally rad
  • 4
    Stackoverflow 1.5k Questions

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is Polymer?

Polymer is a new type of library for the web, designed to leverage the existing browser infrastructure to provide the encapsulation and extendability currently only available in JS libraries. Polymer is based on a set of future technologies, including Shadow DOM, Custom Elements and Model Driven Views. Currently these technologies are implemented as polyfills or shims, but as browsers adopt these features natively, the platform code that drives Polymer evacipates, leaving only the value-adds.

What is Quasar Framework?

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Polymer?
What companies use Quasar Framework?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Polymer?
What tools integrate with Quasar Framework?
    No integrations found

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    Vue.jsSpring BootUnity+7
    2
    1253
    What are some alternatives to Polymer and Quasar Framework?
    React
    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
    Angular
    It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.
    JavaScript
    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
    Python
    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.
    Node.js
    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.
    See all alternatives