Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Postman vs Swagger Inspector: What are the differences?
Introduction
Postman and Swagger Inspector are two popular tools for testing and documenting APIs. While both tools serve a similar purpose, there are several key differences between them that set them apart in terms of features, user experience, and integrations.
User Interface: The user interface of Postman is designed to be more intuitive and user-friendly compared to Swagger Inspector. Postman provides a visually appealing interface that allows users to easily create and organize API requests, set up test scripts, and view responses. Swagger Inspector, on the other hand, has a simpler interface that may be less overwhelming for new users but lacks some of the advanced features and customization options available in Postman.
Testing Capabilities: Postman offers a wide range of testing capabilities, including the ability to write custom test scripts using JavaScript, perform automated testing using Newman or the built-in collection runner, and create and manage test suites. Swagger Inspector, on the other hand, has more limited testing capabilities, focusing primarily on providing a quick way to test APIs without the ability to write custom test scripts or perform automated testing.
API Documentation: Postman allows users to create comprehensive API documentation by adding detailed descriptions, examples, and explanations to each API request, which can be easily shared with others. Swagger Inspector, on the other hand, is primarily focused on generating API documentation using the Swagger/OpenAPI specification. While it offers some documentation features, such as interactive documentation and code generation, it may not offer the same level of customization and flexibility as Postman.
Integrations: Postman offers a wide range of integrations with other tools and services, making it easier to incorporate API testing and documentation into existing workflows. It provides seamless integrations with popular development tools, version control systems, and collaboration platforms. Swagger Inspector, on the other hand, has more limited integrations and may not offer the same level of flexibility in terms of integrating with other tools and services.
Collaboration Features: Postman provides robust collaboration features, allowing teams to share and collaborate on API collections, test scripts, and documentation. It offers features such as shared workspaces, version control, and team libraries. Swagger Inspector, on the other hand, is more focused on providing a quick and easy way to test APIs individually and may not offer the same level of collaboration features as Postman.
Pricing and Accessibility: Postman offers both free and paid versions, with the paid version providing additional features and capabilities. It also offers a cloud-based platform, making it accessible from anywhere with an internet connection. Swagger Inspector, on the other hand, offers a free version with some limitations and a premium version with additional features. It does not offer a cloud-based platform and may require installation on local machines.
In summary, while both Postman and Swagger Inspector are popular tools for API testing and documentation, Postman offers a more feature-rich and customizable experience with a focus on user-friendly interface, extensive testing capabilities, comprehensive API documentation, wide range of integrations, robust collaboration features, and flexible pricing options. Swagger Inspector, on the other hand, provides a simpler and more streamlined approach to API testing, documentation, and visualization but may lack some of the advanced features and flexibility offered by Postman.
From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"
I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).
I use Swagger UI because it's an easy tool for end-consumers to visualize and test our APIs. It focuses on that ! And it's directly embedded and delivered with the APIs. Postman's built-in tools aren't bad, but their main focus isn't the documentation and also, they are hosted outside the project.
I recommend Postman because it's easy to use with history option. Also, it has very great features like runner, collections, test scripts runners, defining environment variables and simple exporting and importing data.
Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.
Pros of Postman
- Easy to use490
- Great tool369
- Makes developing rest api's easy peasy276
- Easy setup, looks good156
- The best api workflow out there144
- It's the best53
- History feature53
- Adds real value to my workflow44
- Great interface that magically predicts your needs43
- The best in class app35
- Can save and share script12
- Fully featured without looking cluttered10
- Collections8
- Option to run scrips8
- Global/Environment Variables8
- Shareable Collections7
- Dead simple and useful. Excellent7
- Dark theme easy on the eyes7
- Awesome customer support6
- Great integration with newman6
- Documentation5
- Simple5
- The test script is useful5
- Saves responses4
- This has simplified my testing significantly4
- Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,34
- Easy as pie4
- API-network3
- I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis3
- Mocking API calls with predefined response3
- Now supports GraphQL2
- Postman Runner CI Integration2
- Easy to setup, test and provides test storage2
- Continuous integration using newman2
- Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable2
- Runner2
- Graph2
- <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>1
Pros of Swagger Inspector
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Postman
- Stores credentials in HTTP10
- Bloated features and UI9
- Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens8
- Poor GraphQL support7
- Expensive5
- Not free after 5 users3
- Can't prompt for per-request variables3
- Import swagger1
- Support websocket1
- Import curl1