Pug vs RactiveJS: What are the differences?
Pug and RactiveJS can be categorized as "Templating Languages & Extensions" tools.
"Elegant html" is the primary reason why developers consider Pug over the competitors, whereas "Lightweight" was stated as the key factor in picking RactiveJS.
Pug and RactiveJS are both open source tools. Pug with 18.4K GitHub stars and 1.9K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than RactiveJS with 5.67K GitHub stars and 440 GitHub forks.
Coursera, Key Location, and Sellsuki are some of the popular companies that use Pug, whereas RactiveJS is used by Teleport, LeVego, and Record Bird. Pug has a broader approval, being mentioned in 174 company stacks & 119 developers stacks; compared to RactiveJS, which is listed in 5 company stacks and 8 developer stacks.
What is Pug?
What is RactiveJS?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Pug?
What are the cons of using RactiveJS?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
We use Jade when writing HTML, which is much easier to read and maintain. We compile it to HTML before deploying it though, and don't use Jade's client-side rendering features.
We use Jade for constructing our modular UI. We also rely on Jade interpolation to pass reactive and static values from our Express server.
front-end 수업 때 들은 jade 입니다. html을 효과적으로 다룰 수 있고로 열고 닫을때 혼돈이 없어 좋아합니다. 현재 프로젝트에 gulp와 함께 붙이려는 계획을 갖고 있지만, 아직 연습이 더 필요하다고 생각됩니다.
Structuring our one page app around the data to templating structure of RactiveJS was an easy way to make the code slick and mantainable
Nice templating system, but lacks proper namespacing for non-html / xml data.