Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
RancherOS vs Ubuntu: What are the differences?
1. Filesystem: RancherOS uses a container-based approach where system services run in Docker containers, providing a minimalist OS optimized for running containers, while Ubuntu follows a more traditional model with a full-fledged operating system. 2. Updates: RancherOS utilizes Docker containers for system services, making updates seamless and efficient, compared to Ubuntu which requires manual updates for its packages and system components. 3. Resource Consumption: RancherOS has a smaller footprint due to its minimalist design focused on containers, while Ubuntu includes a larger set of system components and services by default, leading to higher resource consumption. 4. Performance: RancherOS can offer better performance in containerized environments due to its lightweight design and optimized container orchestration, while Ubuntu may experience performance overhead from running unnecessary system services. 5. Customization: RancherOS is designed for containerized workloads and emphasizes simplicity and easy customization through Docker containers, whereas Ubuntu provides a more comprehensive set of tools and options for traditional system customization. 6. Community Support: Ubuntu boasts a large and active community that provides extensive support and resources for troubleshooting and development, while RancherOS, being a more niche product, may have a smaller community and limited resources available.
In Summary, RancherOS and Ubuntu differ in filesystem structure, update methodology, resource consumption, performance, customization options, and community support.
Ubuntu is much more faster over Windows and helps to get software and other utilities easier and within a short span of time compared to Windows.
Ubuntu helps to get robustness and resiliency over Windows. Ubuntu runs faster than Windows on every computer that I have ever tested. LibreOffice (Ubuntu's default office suite) runs much faster than Microsoft Office on every computer that I have ever tested.
Global familiarity, free, widely used, and as a debian distro feels more comfortable when rapidly switching between local macOS and remote command lines.
CentOS does boast quite a few security/stability improvements, however as a RHEL-based distro, differs quite significantly in the command line and suffers from slightly less frequent package updates. (Could be a good or bad thing depending on your use-case and if it is public facing)
At the moment of the decision, my desktop was the primary place I did work. Due to this, I can't have it blow up on me while I work. While Arch is interesting and powerful, Ubuntu offers (at least for me) a lot more stability and lets me focus on other things than maintaining my own OS installation.
Pros of RancherOS
- System-docker3
Pros of Ubuntu
- Free to use230
- Easy setup for testing discord bot96
- Gateway Linux Distro57
- Simple interface54
- Don't need driver installation in most cases9
- Open Source6
- Many active communities6
- Software Availability3
- Easy to custom3
- Many flavors/distros based on ubuntu2
- Lightweight container base OS1
- Great OotB Linux Shell Experience1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of RancherOS
Cons of Ubuntu
- Demanding system requirements5
- Adds overhead and unnecessary complexity over Debian4
- Snapd installed by default2
- Systemd1