Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Redux vs Redux Dynamic Modules: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Redux and Redux Dynamic Modules.
1. Stackflexible Configuration: Redux Dynamic Modules provide a more flexible configuration system compared to traditional Redux. With Redux, the configuration is typically done statically during the implementation phase. However, with Redux Dynamic Modules, the configuration can be done dynamically at runtime, allowing for greater flexibility in managing state and reducing boilerplate code.
2. Asynchronous Loading: Redux Dynamic Modules offer built-in support for asynchronous loading of modules, eliminating the need for additional middleware, such as Redux Thunk or Redux Saga. This makes it easier to handle asynchronous actions and simplifies the overall development process.
3. Dynamically Adding and Removing Modules: Redux Dynamic Modules allow modules to be dynamically added or removed from the store at runtime. This means that new features or functionalities can be added to the application without requiring a full rebuild or restart. This flexibility enables easier code splitting and lazy loading, resulting in improved performance and better user experience.
4. Code Splitting and Lazy Loading: Redux Dynamic Modules support code splitting and lazy loading out of the box. This means that modules can be loaded asynchronously, only when needed, reducing the initial load time of the application. This feature is especially useful for large-scale applications with multiple modules, as it improves startup performance and optimizes resource usage.
5. Namespaced Actions: Redux Dynamic Modules provide a mechanism for namespacing actions, which helps in avoiding naming collisions between different parts of the application. With traditional Redux, actions are globally defined, making it difficult to avoid naming conflicts. By namespacing actions, Redux Dynamic Modules ensure a more modular and scalable codebase.
6. Simplified Setup: Redux Dynamic Modules simplify the setup process by automatically managing the creation and injection of reducers. This eliminates the need for manual registration of reducers in the root reducer, as required in traditional Redux. The module's reducer is automatically added to the store, making the setup process less error-prone and more streamlined.
In summary, Redux Dynamic Modules offer a more flexible configuration system, built-in support for asynchronous loading, dynamic addition, and removal of modules, code splitting and lazy loading capabilities, namespaced actions for avoiding naming conflicts, and a simplified setup process compared to traditional Redux.
Pros of Redux Dynamic Modules
Pros of Redux
- State is predictable191
- Plays well with React and others150
- State stored in a single object tree126
- Hot reloading out of the box79
- Allows for time travel74
- You can log everything14
- Great tutorial direct from the creator12
- Endorsed by the creator of Flux7
- Test without browser7
- Easy to debug6
- Enforces one-way data flow3
- Granular updates3
- Blabla2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Redux Dynamic Modules
Cons of Redux
- Lots of boilerplate13
- Verbose6
- Steep learning curve5
- Design5
- Steeper learning curve than RxJs4
- Steeper learning curve than MobX4