Resque vs Sidekiq

Overview

Resque

Stacks118

Followers126

Votes9

GitHub Stars9.5K

Forks1.7K

Sidekiq

Stacks1.2K

Followers632

Votes408

Resque vs Sidekiq: What are the differences?

Introduction

Resque and Sidekiq are both job processing libraries in Ruby that help run background tasks efficiently. While they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between the two.

Concurrency Model: Resque uses a single worker process per job and relies on forking to achieve parallelism. On the other hand, Sidekiq uses threads within a single process, allowing for higher concurrency and efficient utilization of system resources.
Redis as Backend: Resque relies on Redis as its backend for job queueing, while Sidekiq also uses Redis but leverages its native data structures and features more extensively. This difference gives Sidekiq an advantage in terms of performance and advanced queueing capabilities.
Error Handling: Resque provides a simple built-in mechanism for retrying failed jobs a certain number of times or moving them to a failure queue. Sidekiq, however, offers more advanced error handling features, such as automatic retries with exponential backoff and dead-letter queues for handling persistent errors.
Monitoring and Dashboard: Sidekiq comes with a built-in web-based dashboard that provides detailed monitoring and metrics about job processing. Resque, in contrast, does not offer a built-in dashboard and requires external tools or custom implementations for monitoring.
Middleware Support: Sidekiq supports middleware, which allows developers to hook into the job lifecycle and perform additional actions or modify the behavior of job processing. Resque does not have built-in middleware support, making it less extensible in terms of intercepting and modifying job processing.
Community and Ecosystem: Sidekiq has a more active and larger community compared to Resque, resulting in a richer ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and community support. Resque, while still popular, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for troubleshooting and extending its functionality.

In Summary, Resque and Sidekiq have differences in their concurrency model, backend utilization, error handling capabilities, monitoring features, middleware support, and community size.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Resque	Sidekiq
Background jobs can be any Ruby class or module that responds to perform. Your existing classes can easily be converted to background jobs or you can create new classes specifically to do work. Or, you can do both.	Sidekiq uses threads to handle many jobs at the same time in the same process. It does not require Rails but will integrate tightly with Rails 3/4 to make background processing dead simple.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 9.5K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.7K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 118	Stacks 1.2K
Followers 126	Followers 632
Votes 9	Votes 408
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 Free 3 Scalable 1 Easy to use on heroku	Pros 124 Simple 99 Efficient background processing 60 Scalability 37 Better then resque 26 Great documentation

What are some alternatives to Resque, Sidekiq?

Beanstalkd

Beanstalks's interface is generic, but was originally designed for reducing the latency of page views in high-volume web applications by running time-consuming tasks asynchronously.

Hangfire

It is an open-source framework that helps you to create, process and manage your background jobs, i.e. operations you don't want to put in your request processing pipeline. It supports all kind of background tasks – short-running and long-running, CPU intensive and I/O intensive, one shot and recurrent.

delayed_job

Delayed_job (or DJ) encapsulates the common pattern of asynchronously executing longer tasks in the background. It is a direct extraction from Shopify where the job table is responsible for a multitude of core tasks.

Faktory

Redis -> Sidekiq == Faktory -> Faktory. Faktory is a server daemon which provides a simple API to produce and consume background jobs. Jobs are a small JSON hash with a few mandatory keys.

Kue

Kue is a feature rich priority job queue for node.js backed by redis. A key feature of Kue is its clean user-interface for viewing and managing queued, active, failed, and completed jobs.

Bull

The fastest, most reliable, Redis-based queue for Node. Carefully written for rock solid stability and atomicity.

Cron

Background-only application which launches and runs other applications, or opens documents, at specified dates and times.

PHP-FPM

It is an alternative PHP FastCGI implementation with some additional features useful for sites of any size, especially busier sites. It includes Adaptive process spawning, Advanced process management with graceful stop/start, Emergency restart in case of accidental opcode cache destruction etc.

Que

Que is a high-performance alternative to DelayedJob or QueueClassic that improves the reliability of your application by protecting your jobs with the same ACID guarantees as the rest of your data.

Goose

It is a simple, reliable & scalable background processing library for Clojure. It has a transparent design & cloud-native architecture.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Resque vs Sidekiq: What are the differences?

Introduction

Resque and Sidekiq are both job processing libraries in Ruby that help run background tasks efficiently. While they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between the two.

Concurrency Model: Resque uses a single worker process per job and relies on forking to achieve parallelism. On the other hand, Sidekiq uses threads within a single process, allowing for higher concurrency and efficient utilization of system resources.
Redis as Backend: Resque relies on Redis as its backend for job queueing, while Sidekiq also uses Redis but leverages its native data structures and features more extensively. This difference gives Sidekiq an advantage in terms of performance and advanced queueing capabilities.
Error Handling: Resque provides a simple built-in mechanism for retrying failed jobs a certain number of times or moving them to a failure queue. Sidekiq, however, offers more advanced error handling features, such as automatic retries with exponential backoff and dead-letter queues for handling persistent errors.
Monitoring and Dashboard: Sidekiq comes with a built-in web-based dashboard that provides detailed monitoring and metrics about job processing. Resque, in contrast, does not offer a built-in dashboard and requires external tools or custom implementations for monitoring.
Middleware Support: Sidekiq supports middleware, which allows developers to hook into the job lifecycle and perform additional actions or modify the behavior of job processing. Resque does not have built-in middleware support, making it less extensible in terms of intercepting and modifying job processing.
Community and Ecosystem: Sidekiq has a more active and larger community compared to Resque, resulting in a richer ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and community support. Resque, while still popular, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for troubleshooting and extending its functionality.

In Summary, Resque and Sidekiq have differences in their concurrency model, backend utilization, error handling capabilities, monitoring features, middleware support, and community size.