StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Remote Procedure Call
  5. REST vs WCF

REST vs WCF

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

REST
REST
Stacks239
Followers198
Votes0
WCF
WCF
Stacks125
Followers107
Votes5

REST vs WCF: What are the differences?

## Key differences between REST and WCF

REST (Representational State Transfer) and WCF (Windows Communication Foundation) are both technologies used for building web services, but they have key differences that distinguish them from each other. 

1. **Architectural Style**: REST follows a simple architectural style based on standard HTTP methods like GET, POST, PUT, and DELETE, making it more lightweight and easier to understand. On the other hand, WCF is a comprehensive framework that supports various protocols and formats, offering more flexibility but at the cost of complexity.
   
2. **Interoperability**: REST services can be easily consumed by clients developed on different platforms and using different technologies due to its reliance on standard web protocols. In contrast, WCF services are tightly coupled with the Windows platform and require additional configuration for cross-platform interoperability, making it less versatile in heterogeneous environments.
   
3. **State Management**: RESTful services are stateless, meaning each request from the client contains all the information needed by the server to fulfill it, simplifying scalability and reliability. WCF, however, supports various communication patterns, including stateful services, which can maintain session information between multiple requests, offering more advanced capabilities but potentially introducing complexity and performance overhead.
   
4. **Service Contracts**: In REST, services are typically defined by uniform resource identifiers (URIs) representing resources, and their interactions are based on representing and manipulating resource representations. WCF, on the other hand, uses explicit service contracts defined by interfaces and data contracts, allowing for more fine-grained control over service behaviors and message formats.
   
5. **Protocol Support**: REST primarily uses HTTP as its communication protocol, leveraging its built-in features for addressing, routing, and security. WCF, in contrast, supports multiple communication protocols such as TCP, HTTP, and MSMQ, allowing for more diverse network configurations but potentially complicating service deployment and maintenance.
   
6. **Platform Compatibility**: REST services are platform-agnostic and can be hosted on any web server that supports HTTP, making them easier to deploy and integrate into existing systems. WCF services, on the other hand, are tightly integrated with the Windows operating system and require IIS (Internet Information Services) for hosting, limiting their portability and interoperability with non-Windows environments.

In Summary, the key differences between REST and WCF lie in their architectural style, interoperability, state management, service contracts, protocol support, and platform compatibility. Each technology offers unique advantages and trade-offs, making them suitable for different use cases depending on requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

REST
REST
WCF
WCF

An architectural style for developing web services. A distributed system framework that uses Web protocols and technologies.

It is a framework for building service-oriented applications. Using this, you can send data as asynchronous messages from one service endpoint to another. A service endpoint can be part of a continuously available service hosted by IIS, or it can be a service hosted in an application.

Statistics
Stacks
239
Stacks
125
Followers
198
Followers
107
Votes
0
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Popularity
Pros
  • 5
    Classes

What are some alternatives to REST, WCF?

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase