Semantic UI vs Skeleton: What are the differences?
What is Semantic UI? A UI Component library implemented using a set of specifications designed around natural language. Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.
What is Skeleton? A Beautiful Boilerplate for Responsive, Mobile-Friendly Development. Skeleton is a small collection of CSS files that can help you rapidly develop sites that look beautiful at any size, be it a 17" laptop screen or an iPhone.
Semantic UI and Skeleton belong to "Front-End Frameworks" category of the tech stack.
Some of the features offered by Semantic UI are:
- Build Responsive Layouts Easier
- Self Explanatory
- Tag ambivalent
On the other hand, Skeleton provides the following key features:
- Responsive Grid Down To Mobile
- Fast to Start
- Style Agnostic
"Easy to use and looks elegant" is the primary reason why developers consider Semantic UI over the competitors, whereas "Minimalist" was stated as the key factor in picking Skeleton.
Semantic UI and Skeleton are both open source tools. It seems that Semantic UI with 45.9K GitHub stars and 4.84K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Skeleton with 16.8K GitHub stars and 2.93K GitHub forks.
Snapchat, Create.It, and Reviewable are some of the popular companies that use Semantic UI, whereas Skeleton is used by Ledger Note, Spirit Pixels™, and emotion.me. Semantic UI has a broader approval, being mentioned in 77 company stacks & 55 developers stacks; compared to Skeleton, which is listed in 8 company stacks and 3 developer stacks.
What is Semantic UI?
What is Skeleton?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Semantic UI?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Skeleton?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
ReactQL is written in TypeScript to provide full types/Intellisense, and pick up hard-to-diagnose goofs that might later show up at runtime. React makes heavy use of Webpack 4 to handle transforming your code to an optimised client-side bundle, and in throws back just enough code needed for the initial render, while seamlessly handling
import statements asynchronously as needed, making the payload your user downloads ultimately much smaller than trying to do it by hand.
React Helmet was chosen to handle
<head> content, because it works universally, making it easy to throw back the correct
<title> and other tags on the initial render, as well as inject new tags for subsequent client-side views.
<style> tags when using #StyledComponents.
React Router handles routing, because it works both on the server and in the client. ReactQL customises it further by capturing non-200 responses on the server, redirecting or throwing back custom 404 pages as needed.
Koa is the web server that handles all incoming HTTP requests, because it's fast (TTFB < 5ms, even after fully rendering React), and its natively #async, making it easy to async/await inside routes and middleware.
Like Bootstrap, It offers the same CSS framework service (Which I prefer to say cheatsheet ;)) but less complex and cleaner look and to the point.
I used it for some private stuff lately where I only needed a grid and was looking for the leanest framework there is.
We use Semantic UI for our frotend. A heavily customised version of it, but still Semantic UI under the hood.
Used Semantic UI + Angular2 together with Spring or Node/Express for full stack web application development.