SonarQube vs WhiteSource

Overview

SonarQube

Stacks1.9K

Followers2.0K

Votes53

GitHub Stars10.0K

Forks2.1K

WhiteSource

Stacks25

Followers67

Votes0

SonarQube vs WhiteSource: What are the differences?

Introduction

SonarQube and WhiteSource are two popular tools used for code analysis and vulnerability management in software development projects. While both aim to improve code quality and security, there are several key differences between these two tools.

Scope of analysis: SonarQube is primarily focused on code quality analysis and provides detailed reports on code smells, bugs, vulnerabilities, and code duplications. It helps developers identify and fix issues in their code. On the other hand, WhiteSource goes beyond code analysis and offers a comprehensive software composition analysis (SCA) solution. It not only analyzes the project's source code but also identifies vulnerabilities and security risks arising from open-source libraries and external dependencies used in the project.
Integration and support for different programming languages: SonarQube supports a wide range of programming languages, including popular ones like Java, C#, JavaScript, Python, and PHP. It provides language-specific analyzers to perform in-depth analysis. WhiteSource, on the other hand, focuses more on the analysis of open-source libraries and therefore supports a broader range of programming languages, including niche ones and even those with limited community support.
Automation and CI/CD integration: SonarQube offers seamless integration with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins and Azure DevOps, allowing developers to automate code quality checks as part of their continuous integration and delivery processes. WhiteSource also provides CI/CD integrations, but its main focus is on scanning and managing the security of open-source components used in the project, making it an important tool for DevSecOps teams.
Licensing and pricing model: SonarQube's core features are available as an open-source tool, making it cost-effective for small teams or organizations with limited budgets. However, it also offers a paid version called SonarQube Developer Edition, which adds extra features and support. On the other hand, WhiteSource is a commercial product with different pricing tiers based on the organization's size and needs. Its pricing is primarily based on the number of developers and the level of support required.
Deployment options and scalability: SonarQube can be self-hosted on-premises or deployed in the cloud using platforms like AWS, Azure, or GCP. It offers scalability options to handle large codebases and supports distributed analysis with multiple SonarQube instances. WhiteSource, on the other hand, is a cloud-based solution with no on-premises deployment option. It can easily scale to support small to large enterprises, but the cloud-based nature might not be suitable for organizations with strict data privacy or regulatory requirements.
Focus on open source security: While both SonarQube and WhiteSource provide security analysis, WhiteSource has a stronger focus on open-source security. It provides vulnerability alerts, remediation suggestions, and license compliance checks specifically for open-source libraries used in the project. This specialized attention to identifying and addressing vulnerabilities in open-source components sets WhiteSource apart from SonarQube.

In Summary, SonarQube primarily focuses on code quality analysis across multiple programming languages, while WhiteSource goes beyond code analysis and specializes in identifying vulnerabilities and security risks in open-source libraries used in a project. It offers a comprehensive software composition analysis (SCA) solution and integrates seamlessly with CI/CD processes. SonarQube has a broader language support and offers both open-source and paid versions, while WhiteSource is a commercial tool with cloud-based deployment and a strong emphasis on open-source security.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on SonarQube, WhiteSource

Bryan

SRE Manager at Subsplash

Apr 1, 2020

Needs adviceon

WhiteSource

Snyk

Sonatype Nexus

I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.

461k views461k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

SonarQube	WhiteSource
SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.	The leading solution for agile open source security and license compliance management, WhiteSource integrates with the DevOps pipeline to detect vulnerable open source libraries in real-time.
Multi-language;Detect tricky issues;Security analysis;Enhance your workflow	Open source components identification; Open source security management; Open source licensees management Open source policies enforcement; Due diligence report;
Statistics
GitHub Stars 10.0K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.1K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 1.9K	Stacks 25
Followers 2.0K	Followers 67
Votes 53	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 26 Tracks code complexity and smell trends 16 IDE Integration 9 Complete code Review 2 Difficult to deploy Cons 7 Sales process is long and unfriendly 7 Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful 1 Does not integrate with Snyk	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Gradle Apache Maven Jenkins TeamCity Appveyor Travis CI Apache Ant Bamboo	Apache Ant Docker AWS CodeBuild Apache Maven PHP Google Cloud Build .NET Core CocoaPods npm TeamCity

What are some alternatives to SonarQube, WhiteSource?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

Related Comparisons

SonarQube vs WhiteSource: What are the differences?

Introduction

Scope of analysis: SonarQube is primarily focused on code quality analysis and provides detailed reports on code smells, bugs, vulnerabilities, and code duplications. It helps developers identify and fix issues in their code. On the other hand, WhiteSource goes beyond code analysis and offers a comprehensive software composition analysis (SCA) solution. It not only analyzes the project's source code but also identifies vulnerabilities and security risks arising from open-source libraries and external dependencies used in the project.
Integration and support for different programming languages: SonarQube supports a wide range of programming languages, including popular ones like Java, C#, JavaScript, Python, and PHP. It provides language-specific analyzers to perform in-depth analysis. WhiteSource, on the other hand, focuses more on the analysis of open-source libraries and therefore supports a broader range of programming languages, including niche ones and even those with limited community support.
Automation and CI/CD integration: SonarQube offers seamless integration with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins and Azure DevOps, allowing developers to automate code quality checks as part of their continuous integration and delivery processes. WhiteSource also provides CI/CD integrations, but its main focus is on scanning and managing the security of open-source components used in the project, making it an important tool for DevSecOps teams.
Licensing and pricing model: SonarQube's core features are available as an open-source tool, making it cost-effective for small teams or organizations with limited budgets. However, it also offers a paid version called SonarQube Developer Edition, which adds extra features and support. On the other hand, WhiteSource is a commercial product with different pricing tiers based on the organization's size and needs. Its pricing is primarily based on the number of developers and the level of support required.
Deployment options and scalability: SonarQube can be self-hosted on-premises or deployed in the cloud using platforms like AWS, Azure, or GCP. It offers scalability options to handle large codebases and supports distributed analysis with multiple SonarQube instances. WhiteSource, on the other hand, is a cloud-based solution with no on-premises deployment option. It can easily scale to support small to large enterprises, but the cloud-based nature might not be suitable for organizations with strict data privacy or regulatory requirements.
Focus on open source security: While both SonarQube and WhiteSource provide security analysis, WhiteSource has a stronger focus on open-source security. It provides vulnerability alerts, remediation suggestions, and license compliance checks specifically for open-source libraries used in the project. This specialized attention to identifying and addressing vulnerabilities in open-source components sets WhiteSource apart from SonarQube.

SonarQube vs WhiteSource

Overview