Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Tailwind CSS vs styled-components: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Tailwind CSS and styled-components are both popular tools used for styling web applications. While they serve the same purpose, they have some key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will discuss the main differences between Tailwind CSS and styled-components.
Styling approach: Tailwind CSS is a utility-first CSS framework, where you apply pre-defined utility classes directly to the HTML elements. On the other hand, styled-components use a component-based approach, where you define styles within JavaScript files using tagged template literals.
CSS-in-JS: One of the main differences between Tailwind CSS and styled-components is that Tailwind CSS generates a regular CSS file that you include in your HTML, while styled-components allow you to write actual CSS code within your JavaScript files. This means that with Tailwind CSS, you have a separate CSS file, while styled-components keep the styles encapsulated within the component.
Inline styles: While both Tailwind CSS and styled-components allow you to write styles within JavaScript, styled-components take a more inline styles approach. With styled-components, you have full control over each individual element, allowing you to adjust styles dynamically based on props or other factors. Tailwind CSS, on the other hand, provides pre-defined utility classes that you apply directly to your elements.
Performance: In terms of performance, Tailwind CSS generates a regular CSS file that needs to be loaded by the browser, which can result in larger file sizes. On the other hand, styled-components generate styles at runtime and only include the styles that are actually used in the final bundle. This can result in smaller file sizes and potentially better performance.
Customization: Tailwind CSS offers a wide range of pre-defined utility classes that can be customized based on your application's requirements. You can modify the default configuration file to add or remove utility classes as needed. styled-components, on the other hand, allow you to create reusable custom styled components that can be customized using props or extended with additional styles.
Integration: Tailwind CSS can be integrated into any existing project, regardless of the frontend framework being used. It is not tied to any specific framework and can be used with React, Vue, Angular, or any other framework. styled-components, on the other hand, are primarily used with React applications. Although they can be used with other frameworks as well, they are most commonly used within the React ecosystem.
In summary, Tailwind CSS is a utility-first CSS framework that uses pre-defined utility classes and can be integrated into any project. styled-components, on the other hand, provide a component-based approach to styling and allow you to write actual CSS code within your JavaScript files. The choice between the two depends on your preference, project requirements, and the development ecosystem you are working with.
I am planning to redesign my entire application, which is currently in Bootstrap. I heard about Tailwind CSS, and I think its really cool to work with. Is it okay if I use Bootstrap and Tailwind together? I can't remove Bootstrap altogether, as my application is using the js dependencies of Bootstrap, which I don't want to disturb.
Factually talking about systems, we gotta make two bold headlines about each one: Bootstrap has been around for a while, has a vast community and much probably will not be gone in a while. Tailwind in the other hand, is the trendy framework starting from the past year. Referring to UI, I really prefer Tailwind, however I can't ignore the fact that a lot of libraries that emerged felt short in the end after a few years (a point where Bootstrap kept his status).
You are able to use both them together but I advise you — it will be a mess. And you gotta hope that you won't have any kind of conflicts between class naming and other general styling.
My recommendation would be to use one and only one. Perhaps rebuild the UI with a specific framework in mind, otherwise you will start to workaround things of both frameworks to contradict each other - and your team (if you work with one) will hate you.
You might have heard about bootstrap 5. Bootstrap is now totally jQuery free. i have tried foundation and bulma too. but eventually fall again for bootstrap, as it is most convenient and stable. i use bootstrap with less or sass.
I use both of these regularly. If you're going to have to use Bootstrap due to your js dependencies, stick with Bootstrap. I actually prefer Tailwind, but trying to use both of them and make them "play nice" feels like making things more complex with no real benefit.
EDIT: Sorry for the late response, I just noticed how old this is. StackShare sent me this in an email for some reason so I assumed it was relatively fresh.
We are re-modifying the existing portal to the new one. Looking out for a CSS framework where over-rides are possible, the performance of page loading, extendable, etc Please suggest between tailwind, UIkit and bootstrap frameworks explaining in detail on different factors. I request your help on the same.
Hey Sai, My thoughts on UIkit - It's beautiful, fast, and it has good animation too. Why would I choose it ? Nothing other than giving the internet a new look .
My thoughts on Bootstrap - it's beautiful, if used well. It's very fast and has clean class naming convention unlike Uikit. Why I would choose it ? It's been tested and trusted, I can find a whole lot of resources and a community around it. Also with the type of project you working on I bet Bootstrap would do the job .
Now, considering Tailwind, it's seen as a classic, simple-to-set-up tool with clean utilities. I wouldn't think of tailwind the way I would to Bootstrap or UIkit. What do I mean ? Tailwind is more like a tool set to create your own design flow. Tailwind allows you to build unique design elements, offering you a level of customization that may be unmatched by the other frameworks.
My final thoughts.
If you have the time , setup and use tailwind it will give you a great chance when it comes to customization and performance.
I'm a big proponent of Tailwind and I personally use it whenever I get the chance, mostly because it's not really a UI-kit, but it sounds like in this case a UI-kit like Bootstrap with pre-defined components is more what you are looking for. Bootstrap is (relatively) extendable and overridable and makes it really simple to make a decent looking UI using a handful of pre-defined classes, whereas with Tailwind you configure the classes and create your own components. My main reason for replacing Bootstrap in my workflow is that it feels like the component creation has become so abstracted from the developer that any meaningful customization becomes a chore, resulting in many websites having the generic "Bootstrap-look". Nonetheless, it is effective for creating a pleasant and responsive UI. Though, I don't have any experience with UIkit.
I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.
Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.
I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.
Pros of styled-components
- Very easy to use and integrate11
- Huihui1
Pros of Tailwind CSS
- Highly customizable44
- Quick setup33
- Utility first styles, its amazing30
- Versatile24
- Great docs23
- Customizable16
- Fast16
- Consistent15
- Very light11
- Semantic11
- Open source11
- Responsive9
- Easy Tree shaking with Tailwind CLI1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of styled-components
Cons of Tailwind CSS
- Priced14
- Cluttered html structure5