StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Dependency Monitoring
  5. Dependency CI vs WhiteSource

Dependency CI vs WhiteSource

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Tidelift
Tidelift
Stacks11
Followers19
Votes0
WhiteSource
WhiteSource
Stacks25
Followers67
Votes0

Dependency CI vs WhiteSource: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the realm of software development, Dependency CI and WhiteSource are two popular tools utilized for ensuring the security and compliance of third-party dependencies. Below are the key differences between Dependency CI and WhiteSource.

  1. Security Coverage: Dependency CI focuses primarily on security vulnerabilities within open-source dependencies by scanning for known vulnerabilities and providing detailed reports on potential risks. On the other hand, WhiteSource offers a more comprehensive approach by not only detecting security vulnerabilities but also providing license compliance and risk analysis to ensure holistic dependency management.

  2. Integration Capabilities: Dependency CI integrates seamlessly with popular version control platforms such as GitHub and GitLab, providing real-time analysis of dependencies within the development workflow. WhiteSource, on the other hand, offers a wider range of integrations with various build tools, package managers, and CI/CD pipelines, allowing for a more versatile and streamlined integration process.

  3. Customization Options: Dependency CI offers limited customization options in terms of the scans and policies that can be applied to dependencies, focusing more on out-of-the-box security checks. WhiteSource, on the other hand, provides extensive customization capabilities, allowing users to create custom policies, rules, and thresholds for vulnerability management and compliance monitoring according to their specific requirements.

  4. Scalability and Performance: Dependency CI is designed to cater to smaller and medium-sized development teams, offering a straightforward and easy-to-use interface for managing dependencies. WhiteSource, on the other hand, is better suited for large enterprise-level organizations with complex dependency landscapes, providing advanced scalability and performance features to accommodate their needs.

  5. Reporting and Analytics: Dependency CI offers basic reporting functionalities, providing developers with actionable insights into vulnerabilities detected in their dependencies. In contrast, WhiteSource offers advanced reporting and analytics capabilities, allowing for in-depth tracking of security, compliance, and risk metrics across the entire software supply chain.

  6. Support and Documentation: Dependency CI provides standard support options and documentation to assist users in setting up and using the platform effectively. WhiteSource offers dedicated customer support services, training programs, and extensive documentation to ensure a smooth onboarding process and ongoing support for users at all levels of expertise.

In Summary, Dependency CI focuses on security vulnerabilities with limited customization, while WhiteSource offers comprehensive security, compliance, and customization options with advanced reporting and support capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Tidelift, WhiteSource

Bryan
Bryan

SRE Manager at Subsplash

Apr 1, 2020

Needs adviceonWhiteSourceWhiteSourceSnykSnykSonatype NexusSonatype Nexus

I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.

461k views461k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Tidelift
Tidelift
WhiteSource
WhiteSource

Automatic compliance testing for all of the dependencies in your application.

The leading solution for agile open source security and license compliance management, WhiteSource integrates with the DevOps pipeline to detect vulnerable open source libraries in real-time.

-
Open source components identification; Open source security management; Open source licensees management Open source policies enforcement; Due diligence report;
Statistics
Stacks
11
Stacks
25
Followers
19
Followers
67
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Apache Ant
Apache Ant
Docker
Docker
AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
PHP
PHP
Google Cloud Build
Google Cloud Build
.NET Core
.NET Core
CocoaPods
CocoaPods
npm
npm
TeamCity
TeamCity

What are some alternatives to Tidelift, WhiteSource?

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Snyk

Snyk

Automatically find & fix vulnerabilities in your code, containers, Kubernetes, and Terraform

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

Clef

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

ExpeditedSSL

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Wazuh

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

FOSSA

FOSSA

Stop vulnerabilities, automate compliance, and mitigate third-party risk in your applications

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana