Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Dependency CI vs WhiteSource: What are the differences?
Introduction: In the realm of software development, Dependency CI and WhiteSource are two popular tools utilized for ensuring the security and compliance of third-party dependencies. Below are the key differences between Dependency CI and WhiteSource.
Security Coverage: Dependency CI focuses primarily on security vulnerabilities within open-source dependencies by scanning for known vulnerabilities and providing detailed reports on potential risks. On the other hand, WhiteSource offers a more comprehensive approach by not only detecting security vulnerabilities but also providing license compliance and risk analysis to ensure holistic dependency management.
Integration Capabilities: Dependency CI integrates seamlessly with popular version control platforms such as GitHub and GitLab, providing real-time analysis of dependencies within the development workflow. WhiteSource, on the other hand, offers a wider range of integrations with various build tools, package managers, and CI/CD pipelines, allowing for a more versatile and streamlined integration process.
Customization Options: Dependency CI offers limited customization options in terms of the scans and policies that can be applied to dependencies, focusing more on out-of-the-box security checks. WhiteSource, on the other hand, provides extensive customization capabilities, allowing users to create custom policies, rules, and thresholds for vulnerability management and compliance monitoring according to their specific requirements.
Scalability and Performance: Dependency CI is designed to cater to smaller and medium-sized development teams, offering a straightforward and easy-to-use interface for managing dependencies. WhiteSource, on the other hand, is better suited for large enterprise-level organizations with complex dependency landscapes, providing advanced scalability and performance features to accommodate their needs.
Reporting and Analytics: Dependency CI offers basic reporting functionalities, providing developers with actionable insights into vulnerabilities detected in their dependencies. In contrast, WhiteSource offers advanced reporting and analytics capabilities, allowing for in-depth tracking of security, compliance, and risk metrics across the entire software supply chain.
Support and Documentation: Dependency CI provides standard support options and documentation to assist users in setting up and using the platform effectively. WhiteSource offers dedicated customer support services, training programs, and extensive documentation to ensure a smooth onboarding process and ongoing support for users at all levels of expertise.
In Summary, Dependency CI focuses on security vulnerabilities with limited customization, while WhiteSource offers comprehensive security, compliance, and customization options with advanced reporting and support capabilities.
I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.
I'd recommend Snyk since it provides an IDE extension for Developers, SAST, auto PR security fixes, container, IaC and includes open source scanning as well. I like their scoring method as well for better prioritization. I was able to remove most of the containers and cli tools I had in my pipelines since Snyk covers secrets, vulns, security and some code cleaning. SAST has false positives but the scoring helps. Also had to spend time putting some training docs but their engineers helped out with content.